Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge-based improvement: simulation and artificial intelligence for identifying and improving human decision-making in an operations system

  • Case-Oriented Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The performance of most operations systems is significantly affected by the interaction of human decision-makers. A methodology, based on the use of visual interactive simulation (VIS) and artificial intelligence (AI), is described that aims to identify and improve human decision-making in operations systems. The methodology, known as ‘knowledge-based improvement’ (KBI), elicits knowledge from a decision-maker via a VIS and then uses AI methods to represent decision-making. By linking the VIS and AI representation, it is possible to predict the performance of the operations system under different decision-making strategies and to search for improved strategies. The KBI methodology is applied to the decision-making surrounding unplanned maintenance operations at a Ford Motor Company engine assembly plant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baines TS and Kay JM (2002). Human performance modelling as an aid in the process of manufacturing system design: a pilot study. Int J Prod Res 40(10): 2321–2334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doukidis GI and Angelides MC (1994). A framework for integrating artificial intelligence and simulation. Artif Intell Rev 8(1): 55–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doukidis G and Paul R (1985). Research into expert systems to aid simulation model formulation. J Opl Res Soc 36(4): 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrion RD (1993). Representing and learning distributions with the aid of a neural network. J Opl Res Soc 44(10): 1013–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer D and Paul RJ (1986). CASM—the right environment for simulation. J Opl Res Soc 37(5): 443–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathewson S (1989). Simulation support environments. In: Pidd M (ed). Computer Modelling for Discrete Simulation. Wiley: Chichester, pp 57–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doukidis GI (1987). An anthology on the homology of simulation with artificial intelligence. J Opl Res Soc 38(8): 701–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deslanders V and Pierreval H (1991). An expert system prototype assisting the statistical validation of simulation models. Simulation 56(2): 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrion RD (1991). Intelligent visual interactive modeling. Eur J Opl Res 54(3): 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrion RD (1992). Using a neural network to enhance the decision making quality of a visual interactive simulation model. J Opl Res Soc 43(4): 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrion RD (1993). Using 3D animation techniques to help with the experimental design and analysis phase of a visual interactive simulation project. J Opl Res Soc 44(7): 693–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrion RD (2000). A sequential method for the development of visual interactive meta-simulation models using neural networks. J Opl Res Soc 51(6): 712–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrion RD (1997). An example of simulation optimisation using a neural network metamodel: finding the optimum number of kanbans in a manufacturing system. J Opl Res Soc 48(11): 1105–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierreval H (1992). Expert systems for selecting priority rules in flexible manufacturing systems. Expert Systems Appl 5: 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flitman AM and Hurrion RD (1987). Linking discrete-event simulation models with expert systems. J Opl Res Soc 38(8): 723–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe RM (1989). The role of artificial intelligence in discrete-event simulation. In: Widman LE, Loparo KA and Neilsen NR (eds). Artificial Intelligence, Simulation and Modeling. Wiley: New York, pp 359–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams T (1996). Simulating the man-in-the-loop. OR Insight 9(4): 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu J and Gunasekaran A (1997). An intelligent simulation model to evaluate scheduling strategies in a steel company. Int J Systems Sci 28(6): 611–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffat J (2000). Representing the command and control process in simulation models of conflict. J Opl Res Soc 51(4): 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd AL (1987). Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems: a Practical Handbook. Plenum: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pidd M (2003). Tools for Thinking: Modelling in Management Science. Wiley: Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S (1994). Successful Simulation: a Practical Approach to Simulation Projects. McGraw Hill: Maidenhead, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1986). Expert systems—experiments with rule induction. J Opl Res Soc 37(11): 1031–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S, Edwards JS and Yongfa W (2003). Linking the witness simulation software to an expert system to represent a decision-making process. J Comput Inf Technol 11(2): 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanner Group (2003). Witness2003. Lanner Group: Redditch, UK.

  • Polanyi M (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday: Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigus JP (1996). Data Mining with Neural Networks: Solving Business Problems—From Application Development to Decision Support. McGraw-Hill: New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pampel FC (2000). Logistic Regression: a Primer. Sage Publications: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1987). Expert systems—rule induction with statistical data. J Opl Res Soc 38(1): 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA and Stone CJ (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attar Software (2000). XpertRule KBS Reference Manual. Attar Software: Leigh, UK.

  • Law AM and Kelton WD (2000). Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman GS (1978). Grouping observations in digital simulation. Mngt Sci 24(5): 510–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was jointly funded by the EPSRC (Grant reference GR/M72876), Ford Motor Company and the Lanner Group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Robinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, S., Alifantis, T., Edwards, J. et al. Knowledge-based improvement: simulation and artificial intelligence for identifying and improving human decision-making in an operations system. J Oper Res Soc 56, 912–921 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601915

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601915

Keywords

Navigation