Abstract
This paper proposes a procedure for aggregating individual cardinal utility functions into a social utility function that represents the preferences of all the individuals as a whole. The procedure is non-interactive and is based upon the determination of the utility consensus values. This is accomplished by minimizing a distance function model that is transformed into an Archimedean goal programming problem. The procedure is applied to a general group multilinear utility function.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow KJ (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Commission Monograph 12. Wiley: New York.
Baucells M and Sarin RK (2003). Group decisions with multiple criteria. Mngt Sci 49: 1105–1118.
Belton V and Pictet J (1997). A framework for group decision using a MCDA model: sharing, aggregating or comparing individual information? Rev Des Syst Décis 6: 283–303.
Bodily SE (1979). A delegation process for combining individual utility functions. Mngt Sci 25: 1035–1041.
Bogart KP (1973). Preference structures I: distance between transitive preference relations. J Math Sociol 3: 49–63.
Bogart KP (1975). Preference structures II: distances between asymmetric relations. SIAM J Appl Math 29: 254–262.
Charnes A, Cooper WW and Ferguson R (1955). Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Mngt Sci 1: 138–151.
Cook WD and Kress M (1985). Ordinal ranking with intensity of preference. Mngt Sci 31: 26–32.
Cook WD, Kress M and Seiford LM (1996). A general framework for distance-based consensus in ordinal ranking models. Eur J Opl Res 96: 392–397.
Cook WD and Seiford LM (1978). Priority ranking and consensus formation. Mngt Sci 24: 1721–1732.
Downs A (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row: New York.
Forman E and Peniwati K (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Opl Res 108: 165–169.
González-Pachón J and Romero C (1999). Distance-based consensus methods: a goal programming approach. OMEGA Int J Manage Sci 27: 341–347.
González-Pachón J and Romero C (2001). Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: an interval goal programming approach. Comput Opns Res 28: 827–834.
Ignizio JP and Cavalier TM (1994). Linear Programming. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Keeney RL (1976). A group preference axiomatization with cardinal utility. Mngt Sci 23: 140–145.
Keeney RL and Kirkwood CW (1975). Group decision making using cardinal social welfare functions. Mngt Sci 22: 430–437.
Keeney RL and Raiffa H (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Cambridge University Press: New York (original publication, Wiley: New York, 1976).
Kemeny JG and Snell JL (1962). Mathematical Models in the Social Sciences. Ginn: New York.
Köksalan MM and Sagala PNS (1995). An approach to and computational results on testing the form of a decision maker's utility function. J Multicriteria Dec Anal 4: 189–202.
Linares P and Romero C (2002). Aggregation of preferences in an environmental economics context: a goal-programming approach. OMEGA Int J Manage Sci 30: 89–95.
Nakayama H, Tanino T, Matsumoto K, Matsuo H, Inoue K and Sawaragi Y (1979). Methodology for group decision support with an application to assessment of residential environment. IEEE T Syst Man Cybernet SMC-9: 477–485.
Romero C (1991). Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming. Pergamon Press: Oxford.
Romero C (1997). Multicriteria decision analysis and environmental economics: an approximation. Eur J Opl Res 96: 81–89.
Romero C (2001). Extended lexicographic goal programming: a unifying approach. OMEGA. Int J Manage Sci 27: 63–71.
Sen A (1970). The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. J Polit Econ 78: 152–157.
Acknowledgements
A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the XVII MCDM Conference (Whistler, Canada, August, 2004). This research was funded by the Spanish ‘Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia’ under grant SEY2005-04392. Comments raised by a reviewer are highly appreciated. We would like to thank Mrs Rachel Elliott for editing the English.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González-Pachón, J., Romero, C. An analytical framework for aggregating multiattribute utility functions. J Oper Res Soc 57, 1241–1247 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602103
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602103