Skip to main content
Log in

An extension of Sharpe's single-index model: portfolio selection with expert betas

  • Case-Oriented Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to the portfolio selection problem based on Sharpe's single-index model and on Fuzzy Sets Theory. In this sense, expert estimations about future Betas of each financial asset have been included in the portfolio selection model denoted as ‘Expert Betas’ and modelled as trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Value, ambiguity and fuzziness are three basic concepts involved in the model which provide enough information about fuzzy numbers representing ‘Expert Betas’ and that are simple to handle. In order to select an optimal portfolio, a Goal Programming model has been proposed including imprecise investor's aspirations concerning asset's proportions of both, high-and low-risk assets. Semantics of these goals are based on the fuzzy membership of a goal satisfaction set. To illustrate the proposed model a real portfolio selection problem is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arenas M, Bilbao A and Rodriguez Uría MV (2001). A fuzzy goal programming approach to portfolio selection. Eur J Opl Res 133: 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver W, Kettler P and Scholes M (1970). The association between market determined and accounting determined risk measures. The Account Rev 45: 654–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume M (1975). Betas and their regression tendencies. J Finance X (3): 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ (1987). The fuzzy mathematics of finance. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 21: 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ, Eslami E and Feuring T (2002). Fuzzy Mathematics in Economics and Engineering. Physic-Verlang, Springer: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A and Cooper WW (1961). Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, Vol. I. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor G and Korajczyk RA (1995). The arbitrage pricing theory and multifactor models of asset returns. In: Jarrow R et al (eds). Handbook in OR MS, North Holland: Amsterdam, Vol. 9, pp 87–143.

  • Delgado M, Vila MA and Voxman W (1998a). On a canonical representation of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 93: 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado M, Vila MA and Voxman W (1998b). A fuzziness measure for fuzzy numbers: applications. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 94: 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D and Prade H (2000). Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Massachusetts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elton EJ and Gruber MJ (1973). Estimating the dependence structure of share prices-implications for portfolio selection. The J Finance 28: 1203–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton EJ and Gruber MJ (1995). Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignizio JP (1976). Goal Programming and Extensions. Lexinton Books: Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A and Gupta MM (1985). Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchta D (2000). Fuzzy capital budgeting. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 111: 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SM and Chesser DL (1980). Goal programming for portfolio selection. The J Portfolio Mngt 6: 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SM and Lerro AJ (1973). Optimizing the portfolio selection for mutual funds. The J Finance XXVIII (5): 1087–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Calzi M (1990). Towards a general setting for the fuzzy mathematics of finance. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 35: 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance 7 (1): 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. John Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM and Perold AF (1981). Portfolio analysis with factors and scenarios. The J Finance XXXVI (14): 871–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina Luque J (2000). Toma de decisiones con criterios múltiples en variable continua y entera: implementación computacional y aplicación a la economía. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Málaga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy S (1998). Portfolio selection using fuzzy decision theory. Bank for International Settlements. Working Paper 1020-0959-59, Basle, Switzerland.

  • Rosenberg B and Guy J (1976). Prediction of Beta from investment fundamentals. Financial Analysts Journal 32 (3) (Part I): 60–72 and Part II: 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero C (1991). Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming. Pergamon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa M, Nishizaki I and Uemura Y (2001). Fuzzy programming and profit and cost allocation for a production and transportation problem. Eur J Opl Res 131: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1963). A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Mngt Sci January: 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1970). Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H and Guo P (1999). Portfolio selection based on upper and lower exponential possibility distributions. Eur J Opl Res 114: 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasicek O (1973). A note on using cross-sectional information in bayesian Estimation of security beta. Journal of Finance VIII (5): 1233–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman HJ (1978). Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2: 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful and thank the referees and the editor for the helpful comments. This research has been supported by project MTM2004-07478 of the Spanish Education and Science Ministry. This work has been developed with the inestimable help of the PhD student Carlos Mallo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B Perez Gladish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bilbao, A., Arenas, M., Jiménez, M. et al. An extension of Sharpe's single-index model: portfolio selection with expert betas. J Oper Res Soc 57, 1442–1451 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602133

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602133

Keywords

Navigation