Abstract
Production planning problems play a vital role in the supply chain management area, by which decision makers can determine the production loading plan—consisting of the quantity of production and the workforce level at each production plant—to fulfil market demand. This paper addresses the production planning problem with additional constraints, such as production plant preference selection. To deal with the uncertain demand data, a stochastic programming approach is proposed to determine optimal medium-term production loading plans under an uncertain environment. A set of data from a multinational lingerie company in Hong Kong is used to demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed model. An analysis of the probability distribution of economic demand assumptions is performed. The impact of unit shortage costs on the total cost is also analysed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baykasoglu A (2001). MOAPPS 1.0: aggregate production planning using the multiple-objective tabu search. Int J Prod Res 39: 3685–3702.
Nam SJ and Logendran R (1992). Aggregate production planning—a survey of models and methodologies. Eur J Opl Res 61: 255–272.
Masud ASM and Hwang CL (1980). An aggregate production planning model and application of three multiple objective decision methods. Int J Prod Res 18: 741–752.
Hung YF and Hu YC (1998). Solving mixed integer programming production planning problems with setups by shadow price information. Comput Opns Res 25: 1027–1042.
Hung YF, Shih CC and Chen CP (1999). Evolutionary algorithms for production planning problems with setup decisions. J Opl Res Soc 50: 857–866.
Wang D and Fang SC (1997). A genetics-based approach for aggregated production planning in a fuzzy environment. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernetics — Part A: Systems Hum 27: 636–645.
Ozdamar L, Bozyel MA and Birbil SI (1998). A hierarchical decision support system for production planning (with case study). Eur J Opl Res 104: 403–422.
Foote BL, Ravindran A and Lashine S (1998). Production planning and scheduling: computational feasibility of multi-criteria models of production, planning and scheduling. Comput Ind Eng 15: 129–138.
Buxey G (1993). Production planning and scheduling for seasonal demand. Int J Opns Prod Mngt 13: 4–21.
Mazzola JB, Neebe AW and Rump CM (1998). Multiproduct production planning in the presence of work-force learning. Eur J Opl Res 10: 336–356.
Porkka P, Vepsäläinen APJ and Kuula M (2003). Multiperiod production planning carrying over set-up time. Int J Prod Res 41: 1113–1148.
Zimmermann HJ (1978). Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets System 1: 45–55.
Dantzig GB (1955). Linear programming under uncertainty. Mngt Sci 1: 197–206.
Wang RC and Fang HH (2000). Aggregate production planning in a fuzzy environment. Int J Ind Eng—Theory, Appl Pract 7: 5–14.
Wang RC and Fang HH (2001). Aggregate production planning with multiple objectives in a fuzzy environment. Eur J Opl Res 133: 521–536.
Høyland K and Wallace SW (2001). Generating scenario trees for multistage decision problems. Mngt Sci 47: 295–307.
Silva Filho OS (1999). An aggregate production planning model with demand under uncertainty. Prod Plann Control 10: 745–756.
Lockett AG and Muhlemann AP (1978). A stochastic programming model for aggregate production planning. Eur J Opl Res 2: 350–356.
Kall P and Wallace SW (1994). Stochastic Programming. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester.
Ruszczyñski A and Shapiro A (2003). Stochastic Programming (Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments. This research was supported by an annual grant from University of Southampton, UK and a research grant from Hunan University, China (Project Number 985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leung, S., Wu, Y. & Lai, K. A stochastic programming approach for multi-site aggregate production planning. J Oper Res Soc 57, 123–132 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601988
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601988