Skip to main content
Log in

Combining MCDA and conflict analysis: an exploratory application of an integrated approach

  • Case-Oriented Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The majority of personal and organizational problems are multiparty and multi-criteria in nature; that is, they involve conflicts among people and conflicts among goals. The ability to support, in a OR/MS sense, the resolution of such complex problems calls for the exploitation of the complementary features of multiple established methods.

In this exploratory paper, the authors focus on an integrated use of Drama Theory and MCDA. The aim is to develop an integrated framework for multi-actor, multicriteria decision aid that extends each of the existing methodologies and exploits their potential for synergy with a view to providing more effective decision support, on a uni-lateral or multi-lateral basis, to parties embroiled in such circumstances. The descriptive analysis of a live issue documents the approach and demonstrates the potential for such a framework and the benefits that could arise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann F, Eden C and Williams TW (1997). Modelling for litigation: mixing quantitative and qualitative approaches. Interfaces 27: 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann F and Belton V (1999). Mixing methods: balancing equivocality with precision. Research paper 1999/4, Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bana e Costa CA, Stewart TJ and Vansnick J-C (1997). Multicriteria decision analysis: some thoughts based on the tutorial and discussion sessions of the ESIGMA meetings. Eur J Opl Res 99: 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Ackermann F and Shepherd I (1997). Integrated support from problem structuring evaluation using COPE and V.I.S.A. J MultiCriteria Decision Anal 6: 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V and Pictet J (1997). A framework for group decision using a MCDA model: sharing, aggregating, or comparing individual information? J Decision Systems, Special Issue on Group Decision and Negotiation 6: 283–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V and Stewart TJ (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers: MA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett P and Cropper SA (1987). Maps, games and things in-between: modelling accounts of conflict. Eur J Opl Res 32: 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett P (1985). On linking approaches to decision-aiding: issues and prospects. J Opl Res Soc 36: 659–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett P, Cropper S and Huxham C (1989). Modelling interactive decisions: the hypergame focus. In: Rosenhead J (ed). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Wiley: Chichester, pp 283–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett P and Howard N (1996). Rationality, emotion and preference change: drama-theoretic models of choice. Eur J Opl Res 92: 603–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett P (1998). Confrontation analysis as a diagnostic tool. Eur J Opl Res 109: 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D, Perny P, Pirlot M, Tsoukias A, Vincke P (1993). A manifesto for the new MCDA era. J Multi-Criteria Decision Ana 2: 125–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant J (1997). The plot thickens: understanding interaction through the metaphor of drama. Omega, Int J Mngt Sci 25: 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant J (2003). The Six Dilemmas of Collaboration. Inter-organisational Relationships as Drama. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard N (1989). The manager as politician and general: the metagame approach to analysing cooperation and conflict. In: Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Wiley: Chichester, pp 239–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard N (1990). ‘Soft’ game theory. Inform Decis Technol 16: 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard N (1994). Drama theory and its relation to game theory. Part 1: dramatic resolution versus rational solution. Gr Decis Negotiat 3: 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard N (1998). N-person ‘soft’ games. J Opl Res Soc 49: 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard N (1999). Confrontation Analysis: How to Win Operations Other than War. CCRP Publication Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten G (1997). Support for group decisions and negotiations. An Overview. In: Climaco J (ed). Multicriteria Analysis. Springer Verlag: Heidelberg, pp 332–346.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lehaney B and Paul RJ (1996). The use of soft systems methodology in the development of a simulation model of out-patient services at Watford General Hospital. J Opl Res Soc 47: 864–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews LR and Bennett P (1986). The art of course planning: soft OR in action. J Opl Res Soc 37: 579–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Gill T (1997). Multi Methodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2001). Multimethodology—mixing and matching methods. In: Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Wiley: Chichester, pp. 239–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro I and Mingers J (2002). The use of multimethodology in practice—results of a survey of practitioners. J Opl Res Soc 53: 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod R (1995). Putting soft OR methods to work: information systems strategy development at Sainsbury's. J Opl Res Soc 46: 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod R (1997). The design of organisational intervention: choosing the approach. Omega, Int J Mngt Sci 26: 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod R (2001). Mixing methods in practice. In: Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Wiley: Chichester, pp 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips L (1990). Decision analysis for group decision support. In: Eden C and Radford J (eds). Tackling Strategic Problems. The Role of Group Decision Support. Sage: London, pp 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidd M (ed) (2004). Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford K.J (1981). Modern Managerial Decision-Making. Reston Publishing: Reston Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly carried out while Fabio Losa was a postdoctoral associate at the Strathclyde University. He acknowledges the financial support received from the Dipartimento dell'Istruzione e della Cultura del Cantone Ticino and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F B Losa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Losa, F., Belton, V. Combining MCDA and conflict analysis: an exploratory application of an integrated approach. J Oper Res Soc 57, 510–525 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602034

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602034

Keywords

Navigation