Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-objective heuristic approach for the casualty collection points location problem

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

In this paper, we formulate the casualty collection points (CCPs) location problem as a multi-objective model. We propose a minimax regret multi-objective (MRMO) formulation that follows the idea of the minimax regret concept in decision analysis. The proposed multi-objective model is to minimize the maximum per cent deviation of individual objectives from their best possible objective function value. This new multi-objective formulation can be used in other multi-objective models as well. Our specific CCP model consists of five objectives. A descent heuristic and a tabu search procedure are proposed for its solution. The procedure is illustrated on Orange County, California.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Church RL and ReVelle C (1974). The maximal covering location problem. Papers of the Regional Science Association 32: 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Current J, Daskin M and Schilling D (2002). Discrete network location models. In: Drezner Z and Hamacher HW (eds). Facility Location: Applications and Theory. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskin M (1995). Network and Discrete Location: Models, Algorithms and Applications. John Wiley: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T (2004). Location of casualty collection points. Environ Planning C 22: 899–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover F, Taillard E and deWerra D (1993). A user's guide to tabu search. Ann Opns Res 41: 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi SL (1964). Optimal location of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Opns Res 12: 450–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi SL (1965). Optimum distribution of switching centers in a communication network and some related graph theoretic problems. Opns Res 13: 462–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL and Yoon KP (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer: Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maimon O (1986). The variance equity measure in locational decision theory. Ann Opns Res 6: 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero C (1991). Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming. Pergamon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer RE (1986). Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application. Wiley: NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taillard E (1991). Robust taboo search for the quadratic assignment problem. Parallel comput 17: 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitz MB and Bart P (1968). Heuristic methods for estimating the generalized vertex median of a weighted graph. Opns Res 16: 955–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Würker U (1993). The method of feasible directions for minimax problems in multicriteria optimization. In: Brosowski B et al. (eds). Multicriteria Decisions. Peter Lang Publishers, Frankfurt, Germany, pp 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendell RE and Hurter AP (1973). Location theory, dominance and convexity. Opns Res 21: 314–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon KP and Hwang CL (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 97–104.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny M (1973). Compromise programming. In: Cochrane JL and Zeleny M (eds). Multiple Criteria Decision Making. University of South Carolina, Columbia, pp 262–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny M (1977). Adaptive displacement of references in decision making! In: Starr MK and Zeleny M (eds). Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Studies in the Management Sciences 6. North Holland Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Drezner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drezner, T., Drezner, Z. & Salhi, S. A multi-objective heuristic approach for the casualty collection points location problem. J Oper Res Soc 57, 727–734 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602047

Keywords

Navigation