Abstract
Combinations of problem structuring methods with hard OR methodologies are seldom described in the literature. This paper will reflect on the barriers to such combinations that can be seen at the philosophical level—paradigm incommensurability—and cognitive level—type of personality and difficulty of switching paradigm. This paper examines the combination of Soft Systems Methodology and Discrete Event Simulation within an Intermediate Care case study. The paper will argue, by way of the practical application, that these problems are not insurmountable and that the result can be seen as interplay of the soft and hard paradigms. The idea of yin and yang is proposed as a metaphor for this process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Archer M, Bhaskar R, Collier A, Lawson T and Norrie A (eds) (1998). Critical Realism: Essential Readings. Routledge: London.
Bennett LM and Kerr MA (1996). A systems approach to the implementation of total quality management. Total Q Mngt 7: 631–665.
Bergvall V (1999). Toward a comprehensive theory of language and gender. Language Soc 28: 273–293.
Bhaskar R (1978). A Realist Theory of Science. Harvester: Hemel Hempstead.
Brocklesby J (1995). Intervening in the cultural constitution of systems—methodological complementarism and other visions for systems science. J Opl Res Soc 46: 1285–1298.
Brocklesby J (1997). Becoming multimethodology literature: an assessment of the cognitive difficulties of working across paradigms. In: Mingers J and Gill A (eds). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 189–216.
Brown J, Cooper C and Pidd M (2006). A taxing problem: The complementary use of hard and soft OR in the public sector. Eur J Oper Res, forthcoming.
Burrell G and Morgan G (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Heinemann: London.
Checkland P (1999a). Soft systems methodology: a 30-year retrospective. In: Checkland P (ed.). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp. A1–A66.
Checkland P (1999b). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: Includes a 30-Year Retrospective. Wiley: Chichester.
Checkland P and Scholes J (1999). Soft Systems Methodology in Action: Includes a 30 Year Retrospective. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester.
Coyle R and Alexander M (1997). Two approaches to qualitative modelling of a nation's drug trade. System Dyn Rev 13: 205–222.
Department of Health (2000). Shaping the Future NHS: Long Term Planning for Hospitals and Related Services. Department of Health: London.
Department of Health (2001a). Intermediate Care. HSC 2001/01:LAC(2001)1, Department of Health: London.
Department of Health (2001b). National Service Framework for Older People. LAC (2001)12, Department of Health: London.
Department of Health (2002). Guidance on the Single Assessment Process. HSC 2002/001, Department of Health: London.
DeTombe DJ (2001). Introduction to the field of methodology for handling complex societal problems. Eur J Oper Res 128: 231–232.
Doyle KG (1990). Modelling integrated information systems for institutions of higher education. M Phil thesis, Bristol Polytechnic.
Ellis A and Beattie G (1986). The Psychology of Language and Communication. Weidenfelt and Nicolson: London.
Fleetwood S and Ackroyd S (eds) (2004). Critical Realism in Action in Organizations and Management Studies. Routledge: London.
Gioia D and Pitre E (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Acad Mngt Rev 15: 584–602.
Hartley P (1996). Interpersonal Communication. Routledge: London and New York.
Jackson M (1999). Towards coherent pluralism in management science. J Opl Res Soc 50: 12–22.
Kotiadis K, Carpenter GI and Mackenzie M (2004). Examining the effectiveness and suitability of referral and assessment in intermediate care services. J Integrated Care 12: 42–48.
Kuhn T (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press: Chicago.
Lane D and Oliva R (1998). The greater whole: towards a synthesis of system dynamics and soft systems methodology. Eur J Oper Res 107: 214–235.
Lehaney B, Clarke SA and Paul RJ (1999). A case of an intervention in an outpatients department. J Opl Res Soc 50: 877–891.
Lehaney B and Hlupic V (1995). Simulation modelling for resource allocation and planning in the health sector. J Roy Soc Health 115: 382–385.
Lehaney B and Paul RJ (1996). The use of Soft Systems Methodology in the development of a simulation of out-patients services at Watford General Hospital. J Opl Res Soc 47: 864–870.
Midgley G (1997a). Developing the methodology of TSI: from oblique use of methods to creative design. Systems Practice 10: 305–319.
Midgley G (1997b). Mixing methods: developing systemic intervention. In: Mingers J and Gill A (eds). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 250–290.
Mingers J (1997a). Critical pluralism and multimethodology, post postmodernism. In: Stowell F, Ison R, Armson R, Holloway J and McRobb S (eds). Systems for Sustainability: People, Organizations, and Environments. Plenum, New York, pp 345–352.
Mingers J (1997b). Towards critical pluralism. In: Gill A (ed.). Multimethodology: Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 407–440.
Mingers J (1999). Synthesising constructivism and critical realism: towards critical pluralism. In: Mathijs E, Van der Veken J and Van Belle H (eds). World Views and the Problem of Synthesis. Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam, pp 187–204.
Mingers J (2000). Variety is the spice of life: combining soft and hard OR/MS methods. Intl Trans Opnl Res 7: 673–691.
Mingers J (2001). Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Inform Systems Res 12: 240–259.
Mingers J (2002). Multimethodology—mixing and matching methods. In: Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp 289–309.
Mingers J (2004). Real-izing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Inform Organization 14: 87–103.
Mingers J and Brocklesby J (1996). Multimethodology: towards a framework for critical pluralism. Systemist 18: 101–132.
Mingers J and Brocklesby J (1997). Multimethodology: towards a framework for mixing methodologies. OMEGA 25: 489–509.
Mingers J and Rosenhead J (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. Eur J Opns Res 152: 530–554.
Mullins LJ (1993). Management and Organisational Behaviour. Pitman: London.
Munro I and Mingers J (2002). The use of multimethodology in practice—results of a survey of practitioners. J Opl Res Soc 59: 369–378.
Ormerod R (1997). Mixing methods in practice: a transformation-competence perspective. In: Mingers J and Gill A (eds). Multimethodology: Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 29–58.
Ormerod R (2001). Mixing methods in practice. In: Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Wiley, Chichester, pp 289–310.
Pauley G and Ormerod R (1998). The evolution of a performance measurement project at RTZ. Interfaces 28(4):94–118.
Pfeffer J (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad Mngt Rev 18: 599–620.
Pidd M (2004a). Bringing it all together. In: Pidd M (ed.). Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp 197–207.
Pidd M (2004b). Complementarity in systems modelling. In: Pidd M (ed.). Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 1–19.
Robinson S (2001). Soft with a hard centre: a discrete event simulation in facilitation. J Opl Res Soc 52: 905–915.
Rosenhead J (ed.). (1989). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Wiley: Chichester.
Rosenhead J (ed.). (1999). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds). (2001). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. Wiley: Chichester.
Schultz M and Hatch MJ (1996). Living with multiple paradigms: the case of paradigm interplay in organisational culture studies. Acad Mngt Rev 21: 529–557.
Shakeshaft C (1987). Women in Educational Administration. Sage: Newbury Park.
Shakeshaft C, Nowell I and Perry A (1991). Gender and supervision. Theory Practice 30: 134–139.
Sojka JZ and Tansuhaj P (1997). Exploring communication differences between women and men sales representatives in a relationship selling context. J Marketing Commun 3: 197–216.
Tashakkori A and Teddlie C (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Varela F, Thompson E and Rosch E (1991). The Embodied Mind. MIT Press: Cambridge.
White L and Taket A (1997). Critiquing multimethodology as metamethodology: working towards pragmatic pluralism. In: Mingers J and Gill A (eds). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 379–407.
Willmott H (1993). Breaking the paradigm mentality. Organizational Studies 15: 681–719.
Zhu Z (2001). Towards an intergrating programme for information systems design: an oriental case. Int J Inform Mngt 21: 69–90.
Acknowledgements
Figures in this paper are taken from Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice, M Pidd (ed.), 2004. Copyright John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Reproduced with permission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kotiadis, K., Mingers, J. Combining PSMs with hard OR methods: the philosophical and practical challenges. J Oper Res Soc 57, 856–867 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602147
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602147