Skip to main content
Log in

Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

General morphological analysis (GMA) is a method for structuring and investigating the total set of relationships contained in multidimensional, usually non-quantifiable, problem complexes. Pioneered by Fritz Zwicky at the California Institute of Technology in the 1930s and 1940s, it relies on a constructed parameter space, linked by way of logical relationships, rather than on causal relationships and a hierarchal structure. During the past 10 years, GMA has been computerized and extended for structuring and analysing complex policy spaces, developing futures scenarios and modelling strategy alternatives. This article gives a historical and theoretical background to GMA as a problem structuring method, compares it with a number of other ‘soft-OR’ methods, and presents a recent application in structuring a complex policy issue. The issue involves the development of an extended producer responsibility (EPR) system in Sweden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

References

  • Ackoff R (1974). Redesigning the Future. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akao Y (ed) (1990). Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design. Productivity Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU (1969). Technological Forecasting and Long-range Planning. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey K (1994). Typologies and Taxonomies—An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage University Papers, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson W (1896). Materials for the Study of Variation. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB (1989). Soft systems methodology. In: Rosenhead J (ed). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 71–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen L (1995). Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company: Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle R (2004). Practical Strategy: Structured Tools and Techniques. Pearson Education: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle R, Crawshay R and Sutton L (1994). Futures assessments by field anomaly relaxation. Futures 26: 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey W (1989 [1883]). Introduction to the Human Sciences. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty D and Glick W (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building. Acad Manage Rev 19: 230–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C (1989). Using Cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis (SODA). In: Rosenhead J (ed). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend J (1989). The strategic choice approach. In: Rosenhead J (ed). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 71–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanisch C (2000). Is extended producer responsibility effective? Environ Sci Technol 34: 170A–175A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee GR (1999). Theoretical Morphology: The Concept and its Applications. Columbia University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Merbach H (1975). The use of morphological techniques for OR-approaches to problems. In: Haley KB (ed) (1976). Operational Research'75. North Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris KW (1963). The morphological approach to engineering design. In: Jones JC and Thornley DG (eds). Conference on Design Methods. Pergamon Press, Inc, Elmsford, pp 115–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhyne R (1971). Projecting Whole-Body Future Patterns—The Field Anomaly Relaxation (FAR) Method. Educational Policy Research Center of Stanford Research Institute: Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhyne R (1981). Whole-pattern futures projection, using field anomaly relaxation. Technol Forecast Soc 19: 331–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhyne R (1995a). Evaluating Alternative Indonesian Sea-Sovereignty Systems. Informs (Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences): Hanover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhyne R (1995b). Field anomaly relaxation—the arts of usage. Futures 27: 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey T (1991). Analysis and synthesis—on scientific method based on a study by Bernhard Riemann. Syst Res 8(4): 21–41. (Revised 1996) [Online]. Available at www.swemorph.com/pdf/anaeng-r.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey T (2003). MA/Casper. Advanced Computer Support for Morphological Analysis: A Short Description. [Online]. Available at www.swemorph.com/pdf/macasper1.pdf.

  • Ritchey T and Stenström M (2004). Scenarios and Strategies for Extended Producer Responsibility: Using Morphological Analysis to Evaluate EPR System Strategies in Sweden. (English Summary of a Swedish Government Report.) [Online]. Available at www.swemorph.com/downloads.html.

  • Rittel H and Webber M (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead J (ed) (1989). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead J (1996). What's the problem? An introduction to problem structuring methods. Interfaces 26(6): 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor T (1967). Preliminary survey on non-national nuclear threats. Stanford Research Institute Technical Note SSC-TN-5205-83, 17 September 1967.

  • Thompson DW (1917). On Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences (translated and edited by Shils EA and Finch HA). The Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky F (1947). Morphology and nomenclature of jet engines. Aeronaut Eng Rev 6(6): 49–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky F (1948a). Morphological astronomy. Observatory 68(845): 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky F (1948b). The morphological method of analysis and construction. In: Courant. Anniversary Volume. Intersciences Publishers, New York, pp 461–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky F (1969). Discovery, Invention, Research—Through the Morphological Approach. The Macmillan Company: Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Ritchey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritchey, T. Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis. J Oper Res Soc 57, 792–801 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602177

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602177

Keywords

Navigation