Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Journey Making group workshops as a research tool

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Problem-structuring group workshops can be used in organizations as a consulting tool and as a research tool. One example of the latter is using a problem-structuring method (PSM) to help a group tackle an organizational issue; meanwhile, researchers collect the participants’ initial views, discussion of divergent views, the negotiated agreement, and the reasoning for outcomes emerging. Technology can help by supporting participants in freely sharing their opinions and by logging data for post-workshop analyses. For example, computers let participants share views anonymously and without being influenced by others (as well as logging those views), and video-cameras can record discussions and intra-group dynamics. This paper evaluates whether technology-supported Journey Making workshops can be effective research tools that can capture quality research data when compared against theoretical performance benchmarks and other qualitative research tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

References

  • Ackermann F, Eden C and Williams T (1997). Modelling for litigation: mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches. Interfaces 27 (2): 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken M and Waller B (2000). Flaming among first-time group support system users. Inform & Mngt 37: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (2004). Reasons and Rationalizations: The Limits to Organizational Knowledge. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barley S (1996). Technicians in the workplace: ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organisation studies. Admin Sci Quart 41: 404–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer MW and Gaskell G (2000). Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. Sage Publications: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bottoroff J (1994). Using videotaped recording in qualitative research. In: Morse J (ed). Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 244–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A (1993). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casu B, Shaw D and Thanassoulis E (2005). Using a group support system to aid input-output identification in DEA. J Opl Res Soc 56: 1363–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (2001). Soft systems methodology. In: Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Scholes J (1999). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier PM, Edwards JS and Shaw D (2004). Communicating knowledge about police performance. Int J Product & Perform 53: 458–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis AR, Valacich JS, Connolly T and Wynne BE (1996). Process structuring in electronic brainstorming. Inform Syst Res 7: 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK (1970). The Research Act in Sociology. Butterworth: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl M and Stroebe W (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J Pers Soc Psychol 53: 497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuFon MA (2002). Video recording in ethnographic SLA research: Some issues of validity in data collection. Language Learn Technol 6: 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C (1995). Using cognitive mapping for Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA). In: Rosenhead J (ed). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C (2004). Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. Eur J Opl Res 159: 673–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Ackermann F (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Ackermann F (2001). Group decision and negotiation in strategy making. Group Decis Negot 10: 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Ackermann F (2004). Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector. Eur J Opl Res 152: 615–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS, Collier PM and Shaw D (2003). Making a journey in knowledge management strategy. J Inform Knowl Mngt 2 (2): 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS, Collier PC and Shaw D (2005a). Knowledge Management and Its Impact on the Management Accountant. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants: London.

  • Edwards JS, Hall M and Shaw D (2005b). Proposing a systems vision of knowledge management in emergency care. J Opl Res Soc 56: 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS and Shaw D (2004). Supporting knowledge management with IT. In: Meredith R, Shanks G, Arnott D and Carlsson S (eds). Decision Support in an Uncertain and Complex World: Proceedings of the 2004 IFIP WG8.3 International Conferences on Decision Support Systems DSS2004. Monash University, Victoria, Australia, pp 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS, Shaw D and Collier PM (2005c). Knowledge management systems: finding a way with technology. J Knowl Mngt 9: 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco L, Cushman M and Rosenhead J (2004). Project review and learning in the construction industry: embedding a problem structuring method within a partnership context. Eur J Opl Res 152: 586–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfort-Nachmias C and Nachmias D (1996). Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Arnold Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend J and Hickling A (2005). Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. Elsevier: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw AD (1982). Sound-image data records for research on social interaction: Some questions and answers. Sociol Methods Res 11: 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grise ML and Gallupe RB (1999). Information overload in face-to-face electronic meetings: an integrative complexity approach. J Mngt Inform Syst 16: 157–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG and Lincoln YS (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickling A (2001). Gambling with frozen fire? In: Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 151–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham C and Dando M (1981). Is bounded vision an adequate explanation of strategic decision-making failures? OMEGA 9: 371–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis IL (1982). Groupthink. Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson P and Johnson G (2002). Facilitating group cognitive mapping of core competencies. In: Huff AS and Jenkins M (eds). Mapping Strategic Knowledge. Sage, London, pp 220–236.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly GA (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs: A Theory of Personality. Norton: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger J (1999). Focus groups with users and providers of health care. In: Pope C and Mays N (eds). Qualitative Research in Health Care. BMJ Books, London, Chapter 3, pp 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein HK and Myers MD (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. Mngt Inform Quart 23: 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale S (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee AS and Baskerville RL (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inform Syst Res 14: 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofland J and Lofland LH (1995). Analysing Social Settings: A Guide To Qualitative Observation And Analysis. Wadsworth Publishing Company: Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loizos P (2000). Video, film and photographs as research documents. In: Bauer MW and Gaskell G (eds). Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. Sage Publications, London, pp 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB and Huberman AM (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2003). A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science methods. J Opl Res Soc 54: 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D (1988). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod RJ (1995). Putting soft OR methods to work—information systems strategy development at Sainsbury's. J Opl Res Soc 46: 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod RJ (1999). Putting soft OR methods to work: the case of the business improvement project at PowerGen. Eur J Opl Res 118: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn AF (1953). Applied Imagination. Charles Scribner's Sons: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips L and Phillips M (1993). Facilitated work groups: theory and practice. J Opl Res Soc 44: 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidd M (1996). Tools For Thinking: Modelling in Management Science. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead J and Mingers J (2001). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkowski A-F and Smits M (2001). Constructionist theory to explain effects of GDSS. Group Decis Negot 10: 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D (2003a). Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the ‘brainstormed’ ideas. J Opl Res Soc 54: 692–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D (2003b). Mapping knowledge in groups. In: Edwards JS (ed). Proceedings of Knowledge Management Aston Conference. Operational Research Society, Birmingham, UK, pp 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D and Edwards JS (2005). Building user commitment to knowledge management strategy. Inform Mngt 42: 977–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D, Ackermann F and Eden C (2003a). Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring. J Opl Res Soc 54: 936–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D, Baker B and Edwards JS (2006). Communities of implementation. In: Coakes E and Clarke S (eds). Encyclopedia of Communities of Practice in Information and Knowledge Management. Idea Group Reference, London, pp 35–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D, Edwards JS, Baker B and Collier PM (2003b). Achieving closure through knowledge management strategy. Elect J Knowl Mngt 1: 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D, Westcombe M, Hodgkin J and Montibeller G (2004). Problem structuring methods for large group interventions. J Opl Res Soc 55: 453–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim W (2001). The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Atomic-Dog Publishing: Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden K and Eden C (1998). The theory and praxis of reflective learning in strategy making. In: Eden C and Spender J-C (eds). Managerial and Organizational Cognition. Sage, London, pp 58–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • White L and Taket A (2000). Exploring the use of narrative analysis as an operational research method: A case study in voluntary sector evaluation. J Opl Res Soc 51: 700–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    D Shaw

Authors
  1. D Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D Shaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, D. Journey Making group workshops as a research tool. J Oper Res Soc 57, 830–841 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602155

Keywords

Search

Navigation