Skip to main content
Log in

An emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Changes in the ‘shape’ of risk (ie sources, nature, triggers, scale, rapidity and severity of consequences) relating to supply chains pose challenges for risk management and the underpinning discipline domains such as Operations Research that have traditionally provided guidance and support. The aim is to evaluate these challenges, specifically in the context of supply chain risk management and to consider new approaches to support management. An overall Supply Chain Risk Management Framework is constructed, comprising five components—risk drivers, risk management influencers, decision maker characteristics, risk management responses and performance outcomes. The focus is towards the risk management influencers, recognizing that other components have been investigated elsewhere in the operations literature. Four elements are identified within this risk management component, two conventional elements, rewards and risks, and two new elements, timescale and portfolio effects. An empirical case example is employed to illustrate these issues of risk management in the manufacturing sector and to evaluate the approaches employed to manage risk and performance. The conclusion drawn is that the proposed Supply Chain Risk Management Framework with the inclusion of the risk management influencers component provides a more robust description of the factors that affect the nature of the risk management responses in particular situations. This also demonstrates the need for the Operations Research discipline to evolve a more diverse set of risk management tools and approaches (ie both quantitative and qualitative) to effectively address the diversity of issues and contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

References

  • Ambler T (2000). Marketing and the Bottom Line. Prentice Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AB (1970). On the measurement of inequality. J Econom Theory 2: 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume ME (1971). On the assessment of risk. J Finance 26(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brindley CS (2004). Risk focus towards customers. In: Brindley C. (ed). Supply Chain Risk Management. Ashgate: UK, pp. 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley CS and Ritchie RL (2001). The information-risk conundrum. Market Intell Plann 19(1): 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtonshaw-Gunn S (2004). Examining risk and supply chain collaborative working in the UK construction industry. In: Brindley C. (ed). Supply Chain Risk Management. Ashgate: UK, pp. 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavinato JL (2004). Supply chain logistics risks: From the back room to the board room. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Mng 35(4): 383–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child J (1975). Managerial and organisational factors associated with company performance, Part 2: A contingency analysis. J Mngt Stud 12: 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S and Sodhi MS (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Mngt Rev 46(1): 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher ML (1992). Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Pitman: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M and Lee H (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Mngt 35(4): 388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domar E and Musgrave RA (1944). Proportional income taxation and risk taking. Quart J Econom 57: 388–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RG and Staelin R (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. J Consumer Res 21(1): 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch P (2004). Supply chain risk management. Supply Chain Mngt 9(2): 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1977). Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below Target Returns. Amer Econom Rev 67: 116–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlani D and Mullins JW (2000). Perceived risks and choices in entrepreneurs' new venture decisions. J Bus Ventur 15(4): 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage J and Dewar R (1973). Elite values versus organizational structure in predicting innovation. Adminstrative Science Quarterly 18: 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallikas J and Virolainen V (2004). Risk management in supplier relationships and networks. In: Brindley C. (ed). Supply Chain Risk Management. Ashgate: UK, pp. 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland C, Brenchley R and Walker H (2003). Risk in supply networks. J Purchasing Supply Mngt 9(1): 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes JM and Barnhouse SH (1987). How purchasing agents handle personal risk. Ind Market Mngt 16: 287–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICAEW, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (2005). Risk Management among SME Report, ICAEW.

  • Kleindorfer, PR and Wassenhove LK (2003). Managing risk in global supply chains. Paper presented to Wharton Insurance and Risk Management Department Seminar, 27th February, 2003, Wharton University.

  • Knight FH (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazo H (1960). Emotional aspects of industrial buying. In: Proceedings of the American Marketing Association. AMA: Chicago, pp. 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Padmanabhan V and Whang S (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Mngt Sci 43(4): 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimon KR and Wehrung DA (1986). Taking Risks: The Management of Uncertainty. Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • March JG and Shapira Z (1967). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Mngt Sci 33(11): 1404–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1952). Portfolio Selection. J Finance 7: 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk SA, Stewart DM and Swink M (2004). Metrics and performance measurement in operations management: dealing with the metrics maze. J Opns Mngt 22(3): 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski L (2000). How to identify vendor risk. Pharmaceut Technol 24(10): 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra G, Kyriakis T, Lucas CA and Pirbhai M (2003). A review of portfolio planning: models and systems. In: Satchell S. and Scowcroft A. (eds). Advances in Portfolio Construction and Implementation. Butterworth-Heinemann: Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp. 1–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsson U and Norrman A (2003). Supply chain risk management articles — external characteristics and contents. Working Paper presented at International Supply Chain Risk Management Conference, Manchester Metropolitan University, 13–15 October 2003.

  • Peck H (2005). Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: An integrated framework. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Mngt 35(4): 210–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JB and Hilmer F (1994). Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Mngt Rev, 35(4): 43–55.

  • Ritchie RL and Brindley CS (2000). Disintermediation, disintegration and risks in the SME global supply chain. Mngt Decis 38(8): 575–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie RL and Brindley CS (2004). Risk characteristics of the supply chain—A contingency framework. In: Brindley C. (ed). Supply Chain Risk Management. Ashgate: UK, pp. 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie RL and Marshall DV (1993). Business Risk Management. Chapman Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe WD (1977). Anatomy of Risk. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 19: 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha PR, Whitman LE and Malzahn D (2004). Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain. Supply Chain Mngt 9(2): 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin SB and Pablo AL (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behaviour. Acad Mngt Rev 17(1): 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeltzer L and Siferd S (1998). Proactive supply management: The management of risk. Int J Purchas Mater Mngt 34(1): 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele P and Court B (1996). Profitable Purchasing Strategies: A Manager's Guide for Improving Organizational Competitiveness through the Skills of Purchasing. McGraw-Hill: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson G (2000). A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Mngt 30(9): 731–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szegö G (2004). Risk Measures for the 21st Century. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A and Kahneman D (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin GA, Ellram LM, Carter JR and Cavinato X (2004). An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Mngt 34(5): 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B Ritchie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritchie, B., Brindley, C. An emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement. J Oper Res Soc 58, 1398–1411 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602412

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602412

Keywords

Navigation