Abstract
In this paper, we examine conceptual and practical aspects of carrying out cross-disciplinary, multi-method, interventions that bring together methods from operational research (OR) with ethnographic tools drawn from sociology and anthropology. We note that such methodological hybridization is not a new development, although historically, the role of ethnography in OR has not always been explicit in written accounts. We illustrate such usage by means of a number of concrete examples. We then describe recent work in which we have successfully combined problem structuring methods with ethnographic investigations in order to address disparate problem issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Air Ministry (1963). The Origins and Development of Operational Research in the Royal Air Force. HMSO: London.
Alleyne-Dettmers P (1997). Tribal arts: a case study of global compression in the Notting Hill Carnival. In: Eade J. (Ed). Living the Global City: Globalization as a Local Process. Routledge, London, pp 163–180.
Anderson R, Hughes J and Sharrock W (1989). Working for Profit: The Social Organisation of Calculation in an Entrepreneurial Firm. Avebury: Aldershot.
Antaki C (1994). Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organisation of Accounts. Sage: London.
Atkinson JM and Heritage J (eds) (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Atkinson P (1995). Medical Talk and Medical Work: The Liturgy of the Clinic. Sage: London.
Bittner E (1967). The police on skid-row: a study in peace keeping. Am Sociol Rev 32: 699–715.
Blackett P (1941). Scientists at the operational level. Reprinted as Appendix 1 in Air Ministry (1963) The Origins and Development of Operational Research in the Royal Air Force. HMSO: London, pp 189–193.
Blackett P (1962). Studies of War: Nuclear and Conventional. Oliver & Boyd: Edinburgh.
Bloor M (1978). On the analysis of observational data; a discussion of the worth and uses of inductive techniques and respondent validation. Sociology 12: 545–557.
Boden D (1994). The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Polity: Cambridge.
Brewer J and Magee K (1991). Inside the RUC: Routine Policing in a Divided Society. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
Brocklesby J (1995). Intervening in the cultural constitution of systems—methodological complementarism and other visions for systems research. J Opl Res Soc 46: 1285–1298.
Checkland P (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley: Chichester.
Checkland P and Scholes J (1991). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley: Chichester.
Cohen A (1993). Masquerade Politics: Explorations in the Structure of Urban Cultural Movements. Berg: Oxford.
Dingwall R (1997). Accounts, interviews and observations. In: Miller G and Dingwall R (Eds). Context and Method in Qualitative Research. Sage, London, pp 51–65.
Dingwall R and Strong PM (1985). The interactional study of organizations: a critique and reformulation. Urban Life 14: 205–231.
Eden C and Ackermann F (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage: London.
Eden C, Jones S, Sims D and Smithin T (1981). The intersubjectivity of issues and issues of intersubjectivity. J Mngt Stud 18: 37–47.
Eden C and Radford, J (eds) (1990). Tackling Strategic Problems: The role of Group Decision Support. Sage: London.
Fielding N and Fielding J (1986). Linking Data. Sage: Newbury Park.
Friend J (1990). Handling organizational complexity in group decision support. In: Eden C and Radford J (Eds). Tackling Strategic Problems: The role of Group Decision Support. Sage, London, pp 18–28.
Friend JK and Hickling A (2005). Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach, 3rd edn. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford.
Friend J and Jessop W (1969). Local Government and Strategic Choice. Tavistock: London.
Garfinkel H (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P and Trow M (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. Sage: London.
GLA (2004). Notting Hill Carnival: a Strategic Review. Greater London Authority: London.
Goffman E (1969). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Penguin: Harmondsworth.
Hammersley M and Atkinson P (1995). Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 2nd edn. Routledge: London.
Harper R (1998). Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents Technology and Organisational Action. Academic Press: San Diego.
Heath C and Button G (eds) (2002). Special issue on workplace studies. Br J Sociol 53: 157–317.
Heritage J (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity: Cambridge.
Horlick-Jones T (2005a). Informal logics of risk: contingency and modes of practical reasoning. J Risk Res 8: 253–272.
Horlick-Jones T (2005b). On ‘risk work': professional discourse, accountability and everyday action. Health, Risk Soc 7(3): 293–307.
Horlick-Jones T and Rosenhead J (2002). Investigating risk organisations and decision support through action research. Risk Mngt: An Int J 4(4): 45–63.
Horlick-Jones T, Rosenhead J, Georgiou I, Ravetz J and Löfstedt R (2001). Decision support for organisational risk management by problem structuring. Health, Risk Soc 3: 141–165.
Horlick-Jones T and Sime J (2004). Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures 36: 441–456.
Kirby M (2003). Operational Research in War and Peace: The British Experience from the 1930s to 1970. Imperial College Press: London.
Kuper A (1996). Anthropology and Anthropologists: the Modern British School, 3rd edn. Routledge: London.
Luff P, Hindmarsh J and Health C (eds) (2000). Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Maynard D (1989). On the ethnography and analysis of discourse in institutional settings. Perspect Social Problems 1: 127–146.
Malinowski B (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Routledge: London.
Morse P and Kimball G (1951). Methods of Operations Research. The Technology Press and John Wiley: New York.
Mingers J and Gill A (1997). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies.Wiley: Chichester.
Rittel HWJ and Webber MM (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4: 155–169.
Rosenhead J (ed) (1989a). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity Uncertainty and Conflict. Wiley: Chichester.
Rosenhead J (1989b). Operational research at the crossroads: Cecil Gordon and the development of post-war OR. J Opl Res Soc 40: 3–28.
Rosenhead J (1991). Swords into Ploughshares: Cecil Gordon's role in the post-war transition of operational research to civilian uses. Public Admin 69: 481–501.
Rosenhead J (1996). ‘What's the problem? An introduction to problem structuring methods. Interfaces 26(6): 117–131.
Rosenhead J (2005). Controversy on the streets: stakeholder workshops on a choice of carnival route. In: Friend J and Hickling A (Eds). Planning Under Pressure: the Strategic Choice Approach, 3rd edn.., Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 298–302.
Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds) (2001). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Wiley: Chichester.
RSSB (2005). How Safe is Safe Enough? An Overview of How Britain's Railways Take Decisions That Affect Safety. Rail Safety & Standards Board: London.
Sauer B (1999). Embodied risk: representing risk in speech and gesture. Discourse Studies 1: 321–354.
Schön D (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books: New York.
Silverman D (1993). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. Sage: London.
Stansfield R (1981). Operational research and sociology: a case study of cross-fertilization in the growth of useful knowledge. Sci Public Pol 8: 262–280.
Stansfield R (1983). Formal organization implies informal organization. Paper delivered to the International Sociological Association Sociotechnics Research Committee, University of Antwerp, 6–7 September.
Stansfield R (1986). The place of observation in OR methodology, or, when and where do workers observe? Paper delivered to Euro VIII: Eighth European Conference on Operational Research. Lisbon, 16–19 September.
Strong P and Dingwall R (1989). Romantics and stoics. In: Gubrium J and Silverman D (Eds). The Politics of Field Research: Sociology Beyond Enlightenment. Sage: London. pp 49–69.
Tomlinson R (1971). OR Comes of Age: A Review of the Work of the Operational Research Branch of the National Coal Board 1948–1969. Tavistock: London.
Uff J and Lord Cullen (2001). The Joint Inquiry into Train Protection Systems (chaired by Professor John Uff and the Rt. Hon Lord Cullen). Health & Safety Commission: London.
Waddington C (1973). OR in World War 2: Operational Research against the U-boat. Elek Science: London.
Zuckerman S (1964). In the beginning—and later. Opl Res Q 15: 287–292.
Acknowledgements
This paper draws on work supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (awards L211252044 and L211272006) and the BP/CARR Complex Risk programme. Subsequent support was provided in part by the Leverhulme Trust via the Understanding Risk programme. We are also pleased to acknowledge the collaborative working arrangements agreed with the Metropolitan Police, the Notting Hill Carnival Trust, and the Greater London Authority (GLA), numerous organizations contributing to the GLA's Notting Hill Carnival Review (2001-4), and Railtrack plc (now part of Network Rail plc); all of which provided invaluable research access. During the course of these projects, we received the support and advice of a great many ‘risk professionals’ and other specialists, and we wish to thank in particular: Sally Brearley, Nick Chown, Rosemary Emodi, Gilbert Fraser, Claire Holder, Lee Jasper, Lawrie Hall, Sue Merchant, John Platts, Andrew Sharpe, Alan Symons, Peter Richardson, Bill Robinson, John Roome, Richard Ryder and Andy Weyman. Our colleagues Mike Cushman and Diane Plamping provided insightful suggestions and able practical assistance at pivotal moments, for which we are most grateful. We also greatly benefited from conversations and collaborative work with a number of other colleagues, in particular: Katie Begg, Mick Bloor, Peter Checkland, Colin Eden, Ion Georgiou, Ragnar Löfstedt, Jerry Ravetz, David Silverman, the late Jonathan Sime, Joyce Tait and John Walls. We are indebted to Hylton Boothroyd and John Friend who helpfully provided important insights into some interesting historical examples of the role of systematic observation in OR. Finally, we thank the referees for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horlick-Jones, T., Rosenhead, J. The uses of observation: combining problem structuring methods and ethnography. J Oper Res Soc 58, 588–601 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602271
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602271