Skip to main content
Log in

Operational research: the science of better?

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bhaskar R (1978). A Realist Theory of Science. Harvester: Hemel Hempstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism. Harvester Press: Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R (1993). Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. Verso: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1978). The origins and nature of ‘hard' systems thinking. J Appl Syst Anal 5: 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1980). The systems movement and the ‘failure' of management science. Cybernet Syst 11: 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1983). OR and the systems movement—mappings and conflicts. J Opl Res Soc 34: 661–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s. J Opl Res Soc 36: 757–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C (1989a). Operational research as negotiation. In: Jackson M, Keys P and Cropper S (eds). Operational Research and the Social Sciences. Plenum: London, pp. 43–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C (1989b). Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis. In: Rosenhead J. (ed). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Wiley: Chichester, pp. 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C, Jones S and Sims D (1983). Messing About in Problems. Pergamon: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R and Jackson M (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Wiley: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend J and Hickling A (1987). Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. Pergamon: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend J and Jessop N (1977). Local Government and Strategic Choice. Pergamon: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Heinemann: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M (1985). Social systems theory and practice: The need for a critical approach. Int J Gen Syst 10: 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M (1989). Which systems methodology when? Initial results from a research program. In: Flood R, Jackson M and Keys P (eds). Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research. Plenum: New York, pp. 235–242.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M (2000). Systems Approaches to Management. Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1995). What is this thing called critical systems thinking?In: Ellis K, Gregory A, Mears-Young B and Ragsdell G (eds). Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice. Plenum Press: New York, pp. 61–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1980). Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and soft systems methodology. J Appl Syst Anal 7: 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1992). Recent developments in critical management science. J Opl Res Soc 43: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1997). Towards critical pluralism. In: Mingers J and Gill A (eds). Multimethodology: Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley: Chichester, pp. 407–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2000a). The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and systems. J Opl Res Soc 51: 1256–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2000b). An idea ahead of its time: The history and development of soft system methodology. Syst Pract Action Res 13: 733–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2001). Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Inform Syst Res 12: 240–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2004). Re-establishing the real: Critical realism and information systems research. In: Mingers J and Willcocks L (eds). Social and Philosophical Theory for Information Systems. Wiley: London, pp. 372–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2006). Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science. Springer: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Brocklesby J (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega 25: 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J, Gill A (eds). (1997). Multimethodology: Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley: Chichester.

  • Mulgan G (1997). Connexity: How to Live in a Connected World. Chatto & Windus: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel H and Webber M (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead J (1989). Operational research at the crossroads: Cecil Gordon and the development of post-war OR. J Opl Res Soc 40: 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simchi-Levy D (2006). The state of operations research. OR/MS Today 33: 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcombe M, Franco LA and Shaw D (2006). Where next for PSMs—a grassroots revolution? J Opl Res Soc 57: 776–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mingers, J. Operational research: the science of better?. J Oper Res Soc 58, 683–686 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602333

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602333

Navigation