Skip to main content
Log in

Forecasting S-shaped diffusion processes via response modelling methodology

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Diffusion processes abound in various areas of corporate activities, such as the time-dependent behaviour of cumulative demand of a new product, or the adoption rate of a technological innovation. In most cases, the proportion of the population that has adopted the new product by time t behaves like an S-shaped curve, which resembles the sigmoid curve typical to many known statistical distribution functions. This analogy has motivated the common use of the latter for forecasting purposes. Recently, a new methodology for empirical modelling has been developed, termed response modelling methodology (RMM). The error distribution of the RMM model has been shown to model well variously shaped distribution functions, and may therefore be adequate to forecast sigmoid-curve processes. In particular, RMM may be applied to forecast S-shaped diffusion processes. In this paper, forty-seven data sets, assembled from published sources by Meade and Islam, are used to compare the accuracy and the stability of RMM-generated forecasts, relative to current commonly applied models. Results show that in most comparisons RMM forecasts outperform those based on any individually selected distributional model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson-Karhi D (2001). Technological forecasting using inverse normalizing transformations Unpublished thesis report, Supervised by H Shore. Department of Industrial Engineering, Ben-Gurion University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade N and Islam T (1998). Technological forecasting—model selection, model stability and combining models. Mngt Sci 44 (8): 1115–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore H (2000). General control charts for variables. Int J Prod Res 38 (8): 1875–1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore H (2004). Response modeling methodology (RMM)—current distributions, transformations and approximations as special cases of the RMM error distribution. Comm Stat (Theory & Methods) 33 (7): 1491–1510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore H (2005). Response Modeling Methodology—Empirical Modeling for Engineering and Science. World Scientific Publishing Co. Ltd.: Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young P and Ord JK (1989). Model selection and estimation for technological growth curves. Int J Forecasting 5: 501–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MATHEMATICA® is a registered trademark of Wolfram Research. This research was done with the partial support of the Paul Ivanier Center of Robotics at Ben-Gurion University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Shore.

Appendix

Appendix

MI distinguish between symmetric models (inflexion point at P t =0.5, like the normal and the logistic models), non-symmetric models (P t <0.5 but constant, like Gompertz and linearized Gompertz), and flexible models (where the inflexion point can occur anywhere within the same model, including P t =0.5; Typical examples are the log-normal, Weibull and the extended logistic). MI denote these classes by class II1 (symmetric), class II2 (asymmetric) and class II3 (flexible). Based on a carefully selected subset of seven models that belong to the different classes (out of the original 29 models), MI introduce the following classification:

  • Class II1: Simple logistic, mansfield (AR),

  • Class II2: Gompertz, Floyd (AR),

  • Class II3A: Weibull, extended logistic (B),

  • Class II3B: Cumulative log-normal,

where the third class (II3) is subdivided, based on results from stepwise discriminant-analysis, which showed that the log-normal ‘behaves differently from the other flexible curves’ (MI, p 1122).

These models are displayed below:

  1. 1)

    Simple Logistic:

  2. 2)

    Gompertz: P t =exp(−c exp(−bt))+ɛ t , b>0, c>0.

  3. 3)

    Cumulative log-normal:

  4. 4)

    Weibull: P t =1−exp(−(t/α)β)+ɛ t , α>0, β>0.

  5. 5)

    Extended logistic (B):

  6. 6)

    Mansfield (AR): P t P t−1=bP t−1(1−P t−1)+ɛ t , b>0.

  7. 7)

    Floyd (AR): P t P t−1=bP t−1(1−P t−1)2+ɛ t , b>0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shore, H., Benson-Karhi, D. Forecasting S-shaped diffusion processes via response modelling methodology. J Oper Res Soc 58, 720–728 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602187

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602187

Keywords

Navigation