Skip to main content
Log in

A dynamic scorecard for monitoring baseline performance with application to tracking a mortgage portfolio

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

A principled technique for monitoring the performance of a consumer credit scorecard through time is derived from Kalman filtering. Standard approaches sporadically compare certain characteristics of the new applicants with those predicted from the scorecard. The new approach systematically updates the scorecard combining new applicant information with the previous best estimate. The dynamically updated scorecard is tracked through time and compared to limits calculated by sequential simulation from the baseline scorecard. The observation equation of the Kalman filter is tailored to take the results of fitting local scorecards by logistic regression to batches of new clients that arrive in the current time interval. The states in the Kalman filter represent the true or underlying score for each attribute in the card: the parameters of the logistic regression. Their progress in time is modelled by a random walk and the filter provides the best estimate of the scores using past and present information. We illustrate the technique using a commercial mortgage portfolio and the results indicate significant emerging deficiencies in the baseline scorecard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert A and Anderson J (1984). On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models. Biometrika 71: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banasik J, Crook J and Thomas L (1999). Not if but when will borrowers default. J Opl Res Soc 50: 1185–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banasik J, Crook J and Thomas L (2001). Scoring by usage. J Opl Res Soc 52: 997–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banasik J, Crook J and Thomas L (2003). Sample selection bias in credit scoring models. J Opl Res Soc 54: 822–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catlin DE (1989). Estimation, Control, and the Discrete Kalman Filter. Springer-Verlag: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duda RO, Hart PE and Stork DG (2002). Pattern Classification. Wiley Interscience: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison P and Stephens C (1976). Bayesian forecasting. J R Stat Soc B 38: 205–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC (1990). Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models, and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer D and Lemeshow S (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalman R (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng Transac ASME 82: 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H and Hand D (2002). Direct versus indirect credit scoring classifications. J Opl Res Soc 53: 647–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljung L and Söderström T (1983). Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas A (1992). Updating scorecards: removing the mystique. In: Thomas LC, Crook JN, Edelman DB (Eds). Credit Scoring and Credit Control. Clarendon: Oxford, (1992). 180–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mari C and Reno R (2005). Credit risk analysis of mortgage loans: an application to the Italian market. Eur J Opl Res 163: 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P and Nelder J (1989). Generalized Linear Models. Chapman Hall: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNab H and Wynn A (2000). Principles and Practice of Consumer Credit Risk Management. CIB Publishing: Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade N (1985). Forecasting using growth curves: an adaptive approach. J Opl Res Soc 36: 1103–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas L, Banasik J and Crook J (2001). Recalibrating scorecards. J Opl Res Soc 52: 981–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas L, Edelman D and Crook J (2002). Credit Scoring and its Applications. SIAM: Philadelphia.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas L, Edelman D and Crook J (eds) (2004). Readings in Credit Scoring: Foundations, Developments, and Aims. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

  • Wagner H (2004). The use of credit scoring in the mortgage industry. J Fin Ser Market 9: 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West M and Harrison J (1997). Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models. Springer-Verlag: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie A (2004). Measures for comparing scoring systems. In: Thomas LC, Crook JN, Edelma DB (Eds). Readings in Credit Scoring. Clarendon: Oxford, (2004). 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young PC (1984). Recursive Estimation and Time-Series Analysis: An Introduction. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Beling P and Overstreet G (2002). A Bayesian framework for the combination of classifier outputs. J Opl Res Soc 53: 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Whittaker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whittaker, J., Whitehead, C. & Somers, M. A dynamic scorecard for monitoring baseline performance with application to tracking a mortgage portfolio. J Oper Res Soc 58, 911–921 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602226

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602226

Keywords

Navigation