Skip to main content
Log in

Developing professional judgement with the aid of a ‘low-profile’ group support system

  • Case-Oriented Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This paper reports positive results from an application of one type of group support system (GSS) to a training application. Reviews of the findings of other trials of GSS have been mixed, and inconclusive. We describe the results of a series of seven training sessions in a field-based application of group process support. The subjects were professionals working in various agencies concerned with the welfare of older people. A ‘low-profile’ type of group support system, based on wireless handsets, was used. This design enabled responses from each participant to be input and displayed anonymously. Each session was aimed at stimulating a dialogue focused on the reasons for differences of judgement, as displayed on a single projected feedback screen. Changes of individual judgements were recorded for subsequent analysis and comparison with already known ‘expert judgements’. Frequent changes of judgement were recorded. A significant proportion of these were related to an improvement, which could not be explained as simply the result of conforming behaviour. We propose that the mode of operation and design of a ‘low-profile’ GSS have the potential to create a learning environment by reducing personal anxieties while encouraging group-based learning with focussed conversation. We conclude that this type of GSS design is particularly suited to ‘selective’-type tasks in groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris C (1999). On Organisational Learning, 2nd edn.. Blackwell Publishers Inc.: Molden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C and Schon DA (1978). Organisational Learning: A Theory in Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch S (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: a minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol Monogr 416: 1–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asch S (1963). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgements. In: Guetzkow H. (Ed). Groups, Leadership and Men. Russell and Russell: New York 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker A, Jensen PJ, Kolb DA (eds.) (2002) Conversational Learning. Quorum Books: London.

  • Chidambaram L (1996) Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quart 20 (June): 143–165.

  • Daily B and Teich J (2001). Perceptions of contribution in multicultural groups in non-GDSS and GDSS environments. Eur J Opl Res 13: 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey N (1969). The Delphi method: an experimental study of group processes. RAND Memorandum, RM-5888-PR.

  • DeSanctis G and Gallupe R (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Mngt Sci 33: 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad J and Hiltz S (1999). An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results. J Mngt Inform Syst 15: 7–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey L (2002). New Directions in Group Communication. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gear AE and Read MJ (1993). On-line group process support. Omega 21: 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gear T, Vince R, Read M and Minkes L (2003). Group enquiry for collective learning in organisations. J Mngt Dev 22: 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves S, Gear T, Jones C, Connolly M and Read M (2006). Learning and anxiety: exploring individual judgement processes in a learning environment with a group support system. In: Banks D (ed). Audience Response Systems in Higher Education, Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA, pp 248–264.

  • Hilmer K and Dennis AR (2001). Stimulating thinking: cultivating better decisions with groupware through categorization. J Mngt Inform Syst 17: 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs W (1993). Taking flight: dialogue, collective thinking and organizational learning. Organ Dyn 22: 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath JE (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers RA and Brashers DE (1998). Argument in group decision making: explicating a process model and investigating the argument–outcome link. Group Dyn 65: 261–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker J et al (1997). Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings. J Mngt Inform Syst 13: 163–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervan GP (1998). A review of research in group support systems: leaders, approaches and directions. Dec Support Syst 23: 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read MJ (2003). Development and evaluation of a group support system in field settings. Thesis (PhD), University of Glamorgan, UK.

  • Read MJ, Edwards JS and Gear AE (1998). Group preference aggregation rules: the results of a comparative analysis with in situ data. J Opl Res Soc 51: 557–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read M and Gear T (eds) (1999). Issues of validity in using group decision support systems. In: Proceedings of The PICMET International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Portland, Oregon.

  • Read M, Gear T and Devold R (2004). An experimental introduction of group process support in social services. Eur J Opl Res 156: 456–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagan-Cirincione P (1994). Improving the accuracy of group judgement: a process intervention combining group facilitation, social judgement analysis, and information technology. Organ Behav Hum Dec Process 58: 246–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds M (1998). Reflection and critical reflection in management learning. Mngt Learning 29: 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbaugh J (1989). Demonstration Experiments in Field Settings: Assessing the Process, Not the Outcome of Group Decision Support. Harvard Business School Research Colloquium. Harvard Business School: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein E (1993). On dialogue, culture and organisational learning. Organ Dyn 22: 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S and Castellan NJ (1988). Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill: New York.

  • Smith K and Berg N (1987). Paradoxes of Group Life: Understanding Conflict, Paralysis, and Movement in Group Dynamics. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson L and Fine GA (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect and behavior: a review and integration. Person Soc Psychol Rev 13: 278–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven A and Delbecq A (1974). The effectiveness of nominal, delphi and interacting group decision making processes. Acad Mngt J 17: 605–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince R and Martin L (1993). Inside action learning: the politics and the psychology of the action learning model. Mngt Educ Dev 24: 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1978). Mind In Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson JB, Karp DA, Dalphin JR and Gray PS (1982). The Research Craft: An Introduction to Social Research Methods. Little Brown: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss-Flamm ED (2002). Conversational learning in multicultural teams. In: Baker AC, Jensen PJ and Kolb DA (eds). Conversational Learning. Quorum Books: London.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Read.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Read, M., Gear, T. Developing professional judgement with the aid of a ‘low-profile’ group support system. J Oper Res Soc 58, 1021–1029 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602254

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602254

Keywords

Navigation