Skip to main content
Log in

Dynastic cycle: a generic structure describing resource allocation in political economies, markets and firms

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

A generic system embodies basic principles and insights that are common to a set of diverse cases and situations. This paper presents a new generic system that we name the dynastic cycle structure. It is based on a stylized model of events from the Chinese history. The model describes resource allocation between social, asocial and control uses in political economies, markets and firms that experience cyclical behaviour and homeostasis symbolizing low levels of performance. Numerical simulations with the model are used to understand the internal dynamics and to test several policy scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandiera O (2003). Land reform, the market for protection, and the origins of the Sicilian mafia: Theory and evidence. J Law Econ Org 19: 218–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein RL and Hines JH (1996). Molecules for modelers. In: Richardson G.P. and Sterman J.D. (eds). Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. System Dynamics Society: Cambridge, MA, pp. 149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2005). The mountain man and the surgeon. 24 December, pp 24–26.

  • Feichtinger G, Forst CV and Piccardi C (1996). A nonlinear dynamical model for the dynastic cycle. Chaos, Solitons Fract 7: 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feichtinger G and Novak AJ (1994). Differential game model of the dynastic cycle: 3D-canonical system with a stable limit cycle. J Opt Theory Appl 80: 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1968). Market growth as influenced by capital investment. Ind. Mngt Rev 9: 83–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1969). Urban Dynamics. Productivity Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1980). System dynamics—future opportunities. In: Legasto A.A., Forrester J.W. and Lyneis J.M. (eds). System Dynamics. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, Vol. 14. North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis M, Perkins DH, Roemer M and Snodgrass DR (1996). Economics of Development. W.W. Norton and Company: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham AK (1988). Generic models as a basis for computer-based case studies. In: Homer J.B. and Ford A. (eds). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Systems Dynamics Society. System Dynamics Society: La Jolla, CA, pp. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier FS and Lieberman GJ (1972). Introduction to Operations Research. Holden-Day Inc.: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes KA (2006). Justice expenditure and employment in the U.S., 2003. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin NCJ 212260. http://ovc.gov/bjs/abstract/jeeus03.htm, accessed 3 October 2006.

  • Krugman P (1993). How I work. Am Econ 37(2): 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (1998). Can we have confidence in generic structures? J Opl Res Soc 49: 936–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (2000). Diagramming conventions in system dynamics. J Opl Res Soc 51: 241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC and Smart C (1996). Reinterpreting ‘generic structure’: Evolution, application and limitations of a concept. Sys Dyn Rev 12: 87–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DL (1970). Dynamics of Commodity Production Cycles. Productivity Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron JA and Zwiebel J (1991). Alcohol consumption during prohibition. Am Econ Rev 81: 242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron JA and Zwiebel J (1995). The economic case against drug prohibition. J Econ Perspect 9: 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft JD, Larsen ER, Lomi A and Ginsberg A (1995). The dynamics of resource sharing: A metaphorical model. Sys Dyn Rev 11: 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov OV, Radzicki M and Saeed K (2005). Stability in a superpower-dominated global economic system. J Econ Issues 39: 491–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GP and Andersen DE (1980). Toward a pedagogy of system dynamics. In: Legasto A.A., Forrester J.W. and Lyneis J.M. (eds). System Dynamics. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences Vol. 14. North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodzinski W (1984). The Walled Kingdom: A History of China from Antiquity to the Present. The Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeed K (1990). Government support for economic agendas in developing countries: a behavioral model. World Dev 18: 785–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed K (1994). Development Planning and Policy Design, A System Dynamics Approach. Avebury Books: Aldershot UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000). Business Dynamics. McGraw-Hill: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher D (1989). The dynastic cycle and the stationary state. Am Econ Rev 79: 1031–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willing JK (1926). The profession of bootlegging. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 125(May): 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme EF (1982). System dynamics in perspective. J Opl Res Soc 33: 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme EF (1990). System Enquiry—A System Dynamics Approach. John Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin D (1992). The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power. Touchstone: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O V Pavlov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saeed, K., Pavlov, O. Dynastic cycle: a generic structure describing resource allocation in political economies, markets and firms. J Oper Res Soc 59, 1289–1298 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602456

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602456

Keywords

Navigation