Skip to main content
Log in

Scaling knowledge: how does knowledge accrue in systems?

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This paper addresses the important and somewhat contentious matter of how knowledge accrues in a system. The matter has at its heart the establishment of a scaling function for knowledge (as distinct from the scaling used for information) which is related to the density of the knowledge structure at any point in the system. We commence with a discussion of whether it is possible at all to scale knowledge, dispensing with any concepts of knowledge as a simple finite resource and making a distinction between the establishment of a metric and the act of measurement itself. First, we draw on the Shannon–Weaver (H) measure to establish how knowledge can be seen as contributing to the partitioning of message sets under the H-measure. This establishes how knowledge contributes to the quantity of information held within a system when viewed as a meta-structure for that information. Second, we build on the idea of knowledge as an endemic property of a structure of interconnections between concepts. We observe that knowledge content can be dense both in structures that are highly interconnected deploying a modest number of concepts and in those where the interconnections are more sparse but where the number of concepts deployed is high. A scaling function exhibiting appropriate properties is then proposed. It can be seen that the scaling associated with knowledge as meta-information and the scaling deriving from the interconnectivity point of view are connected. This scaling function is particularly useful in three ways. Firstly, it outlines the properties of knowledge itself which can be used as criteria for future knowledge-based research. Its application in practice creates the ability to identify areas of knowledge concentration within a system. Finally, this identification of knowledge ‘hotspots’ can be used to direct the investment of resources for the management of knowledge and it provides an indication of the appropriate approach for the management of this knowledge. We make some observations on the limitations of the approach, on its potential as a basis for managerial action (particularly in Knowledge Management) and on its relevance and applicability to OR practice (particularly in respect of systems approaches to knowledge mapping). Lastly, we offer a view on the likely line of research which may result from this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacharach M (1993). Variable Universe Games. In: Binmore K. (ed). Frontiers of Game Theory. MIT Press: Cambridge MA, pp. 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumard P (1999). Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger P and Luckmann T (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Allen Lane: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusoni S, Prencipe A and Pavitt K (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin Sci Quart 46: 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt R (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. University Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook SDN and Brown JS (1999). Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Org Sci 10: 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH and Prusak L (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng PS and Tsacle EG (2006). Emergent learning behaviour in a simulated organization faced with tasks requiring team effort. J Opl Res Soc 57: 603–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dortmans PJ, Curtis NJ and Tri N (2006). An analytical approach for constructing and measuring concepts. J Opl Res Soc 57: 885–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS, Collier PM and Shaw D (2003). Making a journey in knowledge management. J Inform Knowl Mngt 2: 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS, Hall MJ and Shaw D (2005). Proposing a systems vision of knowledge management in emergency care. J Opl Res Soc 56: 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen K (1999). An Invitation to Social Construction. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1973). The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78: 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D (1979). Elementary Information Theory. Clarendon: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A (1992). Beyond Modularity. Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. MIT Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leana CR and van Buren HJ (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Acad Mngt Rev 24: 538–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason J and Mitroff I (1981). Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory, Cases and Techniques. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montibeller G, Shaw D and Westcombe M (2006). Using decision support systems to facilitate the social process of knowledge management. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 4: 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Org Sci 5: 14–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell J and Swart J (2006). Men and measures: Capturing knowledge requirements in firms through qualitative system modelling. J Opl Res Soc 57: 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough H, Swan J and Preston J (1999). Knowledge management: A Literature Review. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setiono R, Pan S-L, Hsieh M-H and Azcarraga A (2006). Knowledge acquisition and revision using neural networks: An application to a cross-national study of brand image perception. J Opl Res Soc 57: 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C and Weaver C (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press: Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D (2006). Journey Making group workshops as a research tool. J Opl Res Soc 57: 830–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D, Ackermann F and Eden C (2003). Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring. J Opl Res Soc 54: 936–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman J (2000). Business Dynamics. McGraw Hill: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart J (2006). Intellectual capital: Disentangling an enigmatic concept. J Intellect Cap 7: 136–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart J and Powell JH (2006). This is what the fuss is about: Systemic modelling for organizational knowing. J Knowl Mng 9(2): 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart J and Powell JH . (2007). Using the coherence of influence diagrams to authenticate the μ-measure of knowledge, in progress.

  • Tsoukas H (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strateg Mngt J 17: 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H and Vladimirou E (2001). What is organizational knowledge? J Mngt Stud 38: 973–994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are most grateful for the contributory and clarifying comments of two anonymous referees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J H Powell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Powell, J., Swart, J. Scaling knowledge: how does knowledge accrue in systems?. J Oper Res Soc 59, 1633–1643 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602497

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602497

Keywords

Navigation