Skip to main content
Log in

Portfolio selection under DEA-based relative financial strength indicators: case of US industries

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Fundamental analysis is an approach for evaluating a firm for its investment-worthiness whereby the firm's financial statements are subject to detailed investigation to predict future stock price performance. In this paper, we propose an approach to combine financial statement data using Data Envelopment Analysis to determine a relative financial strength (RFS) indicator. Such an indicator captures a firm's fundamental strength or competitiveness in comparison to all other firms in the industry/market segment. By analysing the correlation of the RFS indicator with the historical stock price returns within the industry, a well-informed assessment can be made about considering the firm in an equity portfolio. We test the proposed indicator with firms from the technology sector, using various US industries and report correlation analyses. Our preliminary computations using RFS indicator-based stock selection within mean–variance portfolio optimization demonstrate the validity of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam IMS and Sickles RC (1998). The relationship between stock market returns and technical efficiency innovations: Evidence from the US airline industry. J Prod Anal 9: 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali A, Hwang LS and Trombley MA (2003). Residual-income-based valuation predicts future stock returns: Evidence on mispricing vs. risk explanations. Acc Rev 78: 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali AI and Nakosteen R (2005). Ranking industry performance in the US. Socio-Econ Plann Sci 39: 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen P and Petersen NC (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Mngt Sci 39: 1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Opl Res 17: 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A and Cooper WW (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Mngt Sci 30: 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlin WF (1999). An analysis of the financial performance of defense business segments using data envelopment analysis. J Acc Public Pol 18: 287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlin WF (2004). Financial analysis of civil reserve air fleet participants using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Opl Res 154: 691–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrico CS, Hogan SM, Dyson RG and Athanassopoulos AD (1997). Data envelopment analysis and university selection. J Opl Res Soc 48: 1163–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes E (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Opl Res 2: 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM and Zhu J (2004). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Massachusetts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JT, Lundholm RJ and Soliman MT (2003). The predictive value of expenses excluded from pro forma earnings. Rev Acc Stud 8: 145–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS and Shale EA (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Opl Res 132: 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edirisinghe NCP and Patterson EI (2007). Multi-period stochastic portfolio optimization: Block separable decomposition. Ann Oper Res 152: 367–394.

  • Enke D and Thawornwong S (2005). The use of data mining and neural networks for forecasting stock market returns. Expert Syst Appl 29: 927–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham CM, Cannice MV and Sayre TL (2002). The value-relevance of financial and non-financial information for Internet companies. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 44: 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriou GN, Sedzro K and Zhu J (2005). Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Opl Res 164: 555–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1959). Portfolio Selection—Efficient Diversification of Investments. John Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miliotis PA (1992). Data envelopment analysis applied to electricity distribution districts. J Opl Res Soc 43: 549–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou JA and Penman SH (1989). Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock returns. J Acc Econ 11: 295–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan YA and McCue MJ (1996). Development of a financial performance index for hospitals: DEA approach. J Opl Res Soc 47: 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pille P and Paradi JC (2002). Financial performance analysis of Ontario (Canada) Credit Unions: An application of DEA in the regulatory environment. Eur J Opl Res 139: 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotroski JD (2000). Value investing: The use of historical financial statement information to separate winners from losers. J Acc Res 38: 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah TS and Srinivasan B (1999). Improving returns on stock investment through neural network selection. Expert Syst Appl 17: 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1963). A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Mngt Sci 9: 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva Portela MCA, Thanassoulis E and Simpson G (2004). Negative data in DEA: A directional distance approach applied to bank branches. J Opl Res Soc 55: 1111–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamhane AC and Dunlop DD (2000). Statistics and Data Analysis from Elementary to Intermediate. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsett MC (1998). Mastering Fundamental Analysis. Dearborn: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh QJ (1996). The application of data envelopment analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation. J Opl Res Soc 47: 980–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous referees for their many useful suggestions that significantly improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N C P Edirisinghe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edirisinghe, N., Zhang, X. Portfolio selection under DEA-based relative financial strength indicators: case of US industries. J Oper Res Soc 59, 842–856 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602442

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602442

Keywords

Navigation