Skip to main content
Log in

Returns to scale pattern and efficient firm size in the public accounting industry: an empirical investigation

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This paper employs Data Envelopment Analysis to investigate returns to scale patterns and efficient firm size in the public accounting industry in the USA post-Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Using contemporary survey data from Accounting Today's top-100 accounting firms for the years 2003 and 2004, our results indicate that the very largest accounting (first tier) firms display constant returns to scale, whereas approximately half of the smaller (second tier) firms exhibit increasing returns to scale. These findings suggest that while very large firms are optimally scaled, there still are economic efficiencies to be gained through expanding the size of nearly half of the second-tier accounting firms. Results for the remaining second-tier firms show either constant or decreasing returns to scale, indicating that they are either already optimally sized or that they should consider contraction. The results for the second-tier firms remain qualitatively unchanged when the first-tier firms are excluded from the estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Accounting Today (2004, 2005) Top 100 tax and accounting firms.

  • AICPA (2003, 2004). Annual reports to division of CPA firms.

  • Banker, R. D. (1984) Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Opl Res 17: 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Mngt Sci 30: 1078–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Chang, H. and Cooper, W. W. (1996) Equivalence and implementation of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Opl Res 89: 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Chang, H. and Cunningham, R. (2003) The public accounting industry production function. J Account Econ 35: 255–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A., Hunter, W. and Timme, S. (1993) The efficiency of financial institutions: A review and preview of research past, present, and future. J Bank Financ 17: 221–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, P., Cooper, W. W., Li, S. and Rahman, A. (1998) Using DEA to evaluate 29 Canadian textile companies – Considering returns to scale. Int J Prod Econ 54: 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. and Mashruwala, R. (2006) Was the Bell system a natural monopoly? An application of data envelopment analysis. Ann Opns Res 145: 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Choy H, Cooper W and Lin M (2008). The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and the production efficiency of public accounting firms in supplying accounting auditing and consulting services: An application of data envelopment analysis. Int J Services Science 1: 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Opl Res 2: 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craswell, A., Francis, J. R. and Taylor, L. (1995) Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. J Account Econ 20: 297–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K. (2006) Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer Science and Business Media, Inc.: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. and Weiss, M. (1993) Measuring cost efficiency in the property-liability insurance industry. J Bank Financ 17: 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopuch, N., Gupta, M., Simunic, D. and Stein, M. (2003) Production efficiency and the pricing of audit services. Contemp Account Res 20: 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. and Gladstone, J. (1995) KPMG peat marwick: The shadow partner, Harvard Business School Case 9-492-002.

  • Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. and Tavares, G. (2008) Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio Econ Plan Sci 42: 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feroz, E., Kim, S. and Raab, R. (2005) Analytical procedures: A data envelopment analysis approach. J Emerg Technol Account 2: 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J. R. and Stokes, D. J. (1986) Audit prices, product differentiation, and scale economies: Further evidence from the Australian market. J Account Res 24: 383–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, B. (1981) Changing perspectives on size, scale and returns: An interpretive survey. J Econ Lit XIX: 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, D. (2005) The year of merging vigorously. Accounting Today: Top 100 Firms (March), 3.

  • Liu, W., Sharp, J. and Wu, Z. (2006) Preference, production and performance in data envelopment analysis. Ann Opns Res 27: 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. and Onvural, N. (1996) Economies of scale and scope at large commercial banks: Evidence from the Fourier flexible function form. J Money Credit Bank 28: 178–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe, T., Simunic, D. and Stein, M. (1994) The production of audit services: Evidence from a major public accounting firm. J Account Res 32: 241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (2002). Public Law No. 107–204, Sections 404 and 701.

  • Seiford, L. M. (1996) Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995). J Prod Anal 7: 99–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamis, G. (2000) At the crossroads: Consolidation and the MDP pave a new path. Ohio CPA J (July–September): 74–76.

  • Shephard, R. W. (1970) Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, R. and Ying, J. (1992) Unnatural monopolies in local telephone. Rand J Econ 23: 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants (2003, 2004) Management of an Accounting Practice Survey. Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants: Dallas.

  • United States Code Title 26, Subtitle A, Chapter 1, Subchapter B, Part IX, § 269A. Personal service corporations formed or availed of to avoid or evade income tax.

  • United States General Accounting Office (GAO) (2003) Public accounting firms mandated study of consolidation and competition. Report to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the House Committee on Financial Services. July 2003. GAO-03-864.

  • Zeff, S. (2003) How the U.S. accounting profession got where it is today: Part I. Account Horizons 17: 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the comments of the two anonymous reviewers, Rajiv Banker and a senior partner at one of our sample firms.

Data availability—Data is publicly available; a list of sample accounting firms is available upon request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, H., Galantine, C. & Thevaranjan, A. Returns to scale pattern and efficient firm size in the public accounting industry: an empirical investigation. J Oper Res Soc 60, 1495–1501 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.60

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.60

Keywords

Navigation