Skip to main content
Log in

Resource-based strategies and problem structuring: using resource maps to manage resource systems

  • Case-Oriented Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The resource-based view of strategy seeks to explain why some firms consistently outperform rivals in the same industry by acquiring a unique set of strategic assets (or resources). However, differences between dominant managerial mental models in management teams lead to disagreement at the moment of implementing distinct resource-building strategies. This managerial and cognitive view of strategic decision making and competition lends itself to investigation through problem structuring methods. We suggest that resource maps, as a problem structuring method, can be used to interpret managerial mental models for strategic decision making in terms of resource-building processes. Through resource maps, we represent the system of asset stocks believed to be most important for driving business performance. We illustrate the framework by comparing and contrasting maps of the system of resources (asset stocks) that best characterize two leading firms in the UK commercial radio broadcasting industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barney JB (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy. Mngt Sci 32: 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettis RA and Prahalad CK (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strat Mngt J 16: 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx I and Cool K (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Mngt Sci 35: 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C (1992). On the nature of cognitive maps. J Mngt Stud 29: 261–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Ackerman F (1998). Making Strategy—The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Ackerman F (2002). SODA—The principles. In: Mingers J and Rosenhead J (eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited Second Edition 2002. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Ackerman F (2004). Using causal mapping—Individual and group, traditional and new. In: Pidd M (ed). Systems Modelling Theory and Practice 2004. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Spender JC . (eds) (1998). Managerial and Organizational Cognition, Theory, Methods and Research 1998. Sage Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1992). Policies, decisions and information sources for modeling. Euro J Opl Res 59(1): 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ (ed) (1997). Resources, Firms, and Strategies: A Reader in the Resource-Based Perspective. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC and Mason PA (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Mngt Rev 9: 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key Note (2002). Commercial Radio Market Report. Howard, J (ed). Key Note Ltd, http://www.keynote.co.uk.

  • Lane DC (2000a). Diagramming conventions in system dynamics. J Opl Res 51: 241–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (2000b). Should system dynamics be described as a ‘hard' or ‘deterministic' systems approach? Syst Res Behav Sci 17: 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Rosenhead J (eds) (2002). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Rosenhead J (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. Euro J Opl Res 152: 530–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft JD (1985). Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models. Mngt Sci 31: 900–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft JD (2002). Resource management under dynamic complexity. In: Morecroft JD, Heene A and Sanchez R (eds). Systems Perspectives on Resources, Capabilities, and Management Processes 2002. Pergamon: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft JD (2004). Mental models and learning in system dynamics practice. In: Pidd M (ed). Systems Modelling Theory and Practice 2004. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose ET (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Basil Blackwell: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidd M (2004). Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and policy-making: Some reflections. J Opl Res Soc 55: 791–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK and Bettis RA (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strat Mngt J 7: 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera Ungson G, Braunstein DN and Hall PD (1981). Managerial information processing: A research review. Admin Sci Quart 26: 116–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk CR (1984). Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision-making. Strat Mngt J 5: 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D, Franco A and Westcombe M (2006). Problem structuring methods: New directions in a problematic world. J Opl Res Soc 57: 757–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000). Business Dynamics Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irvine-McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole J (1990). The Theory of Industrial Organization. The MIT Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh JP (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory. Organ Sci 6: 280–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren K (2002). Competitive Strategy Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strat Mngt J 5: 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme EF (2003). Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 19: 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments on an earlier version of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M H Kunc.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 46th Annual Conference of the OR Society—Problem Structuring Methods Stream—in York, England, September 2004.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunc, M., Morecroft, J. Resource-based strategies and problem structuring: using resource maps to manage resource systems. J Oper Res Soc 60, 191–199 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602551

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602551

Keywords

Navigation