Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge management: a review of the field and of OR's contribution

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This paper examines the field of knowledge management (KM) and identifies the role of operational research (OR) in key milestones and in KM's future. With the presence of the OR Society journal Knowledge Management Research and Practice and with the INFORMS journal Organization Science, OR may be assumed to have an explicit and a leading role in KM. Unfortunately, the origins and the evidence of recent research efforts do not fully support this assumption. We argue that while OR has been inside many of the milestones there is no explicit recognition of its role and while OR research on KM has considerably increased in the last 5 years, it still forms a rather modest explicit contribution to KM research. Nevertheless, the depth of OR's experience in decision-making models and decision support systems, soft systems with hard systems and in risk management suggests that OR is uniquely placed to lead future KM developments. We suggest that a limiting aspect of whether OR will be seen to have a significant profile will be the extent to which developments are recognized as being informed by OR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

References

  • Ackermann F, Eden C and Williams T (1997). Modeling for litigation: Mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches. INTERFACES 27: 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alstete JW (2007). An assessment of knowledge growth stages in organizations. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M and Karreman D (2001). Odd couple: Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management. J Mngt Stud 38: 995–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaert A and Delesie L (2005). Information visualisation: A holistic tool to discover knowledge. Case study—what video-telephone care? What elderly? Knowl Mngt Res Pract 3: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A (1998). Perspectives on operations research in data and knowledge management. Eur J Opl Res 111: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman T (1999). The current state of knowledge management. In: Leibowitz J (ed). Knowledge Management Handbook. CRC Press: Boca Raton, pp. 1-1–1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell D (1974). The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting . Heinemann: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackler F (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organ Stud 16: 1021–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackler F, Crump N and McDonald S (2000). Organizing processes in complex activity networks. Organization 7: 277–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot MH (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy . Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Collins A and Duguid P (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18: 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS and Duguid P (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ Sci 2: 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (1996). The Rise of the Network Society . Blackwell: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DD, Wiessner CA, Storberg-Walker J and Hatcher T (2007). New learning: A different way of approaching conference evaluation. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase RL (2007). 2007 Global MAKE Awards Executive Summary . The KNOW Network: Ludlow, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Poulter J (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitve Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students . John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Scholes J (1999). Soft Systems Methodology in Action . John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Duan Y, Edwards JS and Lehaney B (2006). Toward understanding inter-organizational knowledge transfer needs in SMEs: Insight from a UK investigation. J Knowl Mngt 10: 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua AL and Pan SL (2008). Knowledge transfer and organizational learning in IS offshore sourcing. Omega-Int J Mngt Sci 36: 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciabuschi F (2005). On IT systems and knowledge sharing in MNCs: A lesson from Siemens AG. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 3: 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakes E (2007). Knowledge leadership: The art and science of the knowledge-based organization. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakes E and Clarke S (eds) (2006). Encyclopedia of Communities of Practice in Information and Knowledge Management. Idea Group Reference, Hershey, PA..

  • Coakes E, Willis D, and Clarke S (eds) (2002). Knowledge Management in the SocioTechnical World: The Graffiti Continues. Springer Verlag, London..

  • Cook SDN and Brown JS (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ Sci 10: 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cress U and Martin S (2006). Knowledge sharing and rewards: A game-theoretical perspective. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 4: 283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dattero R, Galup SD and Quan JJ (2007). The knowledge audit: Meta-Matrix analysis. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology . Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1995). The fad that forgot people. Fast Company 1(1): 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH and Short JE (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Mngt Rev 31(4): 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1969). The Age of Discontinuity . Heinemann: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Ackermann F (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management . Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson L and Sullivan P (1996). Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. Eur Mngt J 14: 356–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS, Hall MJ and Shaw D (2005). Proposing a systems vision of knowledge management in emergency care. J Opl Res Soc 56: 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS, Handzic M, Carlsson S and Nissen M (2003). Knowledge management research & practice: Visions and directions. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 1: 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelou C and Karacapilidis N (2005). On the interaction between humans and Knowledge Management Systems: A framework of knowledge sharing catalysts. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 3: 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey R, Vasconcelos AC and Ellis D (2007). The impact of rewards within communities of practice: A study of the SAP online global community. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C and Perez C (1988). Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In: Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G and Soete L (eds). Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter Publishers: London, pp. 38–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend J and Hickling A (2005). Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach . Elsevier: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P and Trow M (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies . Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. Calif Mngt Rev 33: 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Mngt J 17: 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1997). The knowledge based view of the firm: Implications for management practice. Long Range Plann 30: 450–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (1990). Re-engineering work: Don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Bus Rev 68: 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M and Champy J (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution . Nicholas Brealey: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan H (2008). Back to the future for KM: The case for sensible organisation. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 6: 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan H and Crawford K (2007). Knowledge mobilisation in communities through socio-technical systems. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MT, Nohria N and Tierney T (1999). What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Bus Rev 77: 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple CW (eds) (2003) Handbook on Knowledge Management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York..

  • Huber GP (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ Sci 2: 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jashapara A and Tai W-C (2006). Understanding the complexity of human characteristics on e-learning systems: an integrated study of dynamic individual differences on user perceptions of ease of use. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 4: 227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jyrämä A and Äyväri A (2007). Fostering learning—The role of mediators. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein J, Connell C and Jasimuddin S (2007). Who needs memory? The case for the Markovian organisation. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J and Wenger EC (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation . Cambridge University Press: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ledebur SCV (2007). Optimizing knowledge transfer by new employees in companies. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton D (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation . Harvard Business School Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup F (1962). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States . Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall C, Prusak L and Shpilberg D (1996). Financial risk and the need for superior knowledge management. Calif Mngt Rev 38: 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2008). Management knowledge and knowledge management: Realism and forms of truth. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 6: 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky ML (1968). Semantic Information Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA..

  • Montibeller G, Shaw D and Westcombe M (2006). Using decision support systems to facilitate the social process of knowledge management. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 4: 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G (1986). Images of Organization . Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Robertson M, Scarbrough H and Swan J (2002). Managing Knowledge Work . Palgrave: Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen ME, Orr RJ and Levitt RE (2008). Streams of shared knowledge: Computational expansion of knowledge-flow theory. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 6: 124–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5: 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company, How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation . Oxford University Press: New York and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes MB, Annansingh F, Eaglestone B and Wakefield R (2006). Knowledge management issues in knowledge-intensive SMEs. J Doc 62: 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien F and Meadows M (2007). Developing a visioning methodology: Visioning choices for the future of operational research. J Opl Res Soc 58: 557–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotidis P and Edwards JS (2001). Organisational learning—A critical systems thinking discipline. Eur J Inform Syst 10: 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidd M (2003). Tools For Thinking: Modelling in Management Science . John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintas P (2002). Managing knowledge in a new century. In: Little S, Quintas P and Ray T (eds). Managing Knowledge: An Essential Reader. Sage: London, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintas P, Lefrere P and Jones G (1997). Knowledge management: A strategic agenda. Long Range Plann 30: 385–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riss UV, Cress U, Kimmerle J and Martin S (2007). Knowledge transfer by sharing task templates: Two approaches and their psychological requirements. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey T (2006). Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis. J Opns Res Soc 57: 792–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez E and Edwards JS (2007). Knowledge management applied to enterprise risk management: Is there any value in using KM for ERM? In: Martins, B. (ed) The 8th European Conference on Knowledge Management. Academic Conferences International, Reading: Barcelona, Spain..

  • Roos J and Von Krogh G (1996). The epistemological challenge: Managing knowledge and intellectual capital. Eur Mngt J 14: 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosendaal B (2006). Learning cycles in knowledge-intensive organisations: An exploratory study of the nature and dimensions of knowledge development in four departments. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 4: 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead J (1989). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict . John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead J and Mingers J (2001). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited . John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruikar K, Anumba CJ and Egbu C (2007). Integrated use of technologies and techniques for construction knowledge management. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough H and Swan J (2001). Explaining the diffusion of knowledge management: The role of fashion. Brit J Mngt 12: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1995). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action . Arena: Aldershot, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz DG (2007). Integrating knowledge transfer and computer-mediated communication: Categorizing barriers and possible responses. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990). The Fifth Discipline, the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization . Doubleday: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setiono R, Pan SL, Hsieh MH and Azcarraga A (2006). Knowledge acquisition and revision using neural networks: An application to a cross-national study of brand image perception. J Opl Res Soc 57: 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadbolt N and Milton N (1999). From knowledge engineering to knowledge management. Brit J Mngt 10: 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D and Edwards JS (2005). Building user commitment to implementing a knowledge management strategy. Inform Mngt 42: 977–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial . MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden DJ and Boone ME (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard Bus Rev 85: 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow J (2005). Classification of different knowledge management development approaches of SMEs. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 3: 136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender JC (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Mngt J 17: 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck W (1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J Mngt Stud 29: 713–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton DC (2001). What is knowledge and can it be managed? Eur J Inform Syst 10: 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby K (1996). Transfer of knowledge and the information processing professions. Eur Mngt J 14: 379–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby K and Lloyd T (1987). Managing Know-How . Bloomsbury: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan J (1999). Introduction. In: Scarborough H and Swan J (eds). Case Studies in Knowledge Management. Institute of Personnel and Development: London, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan J, Newell S, Scarborough H and Hislop D (1999). Knowledge management and innovation: Networks and networking. J Knowl Mngt 3: 262–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas LC, Edelman DB and Crook JN (2002). Credit Scoring and Its Applications . Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Philadelphia, PA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Usoro A, Sharratt MW, Tsui E and Shekhar S (2007). Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowl Mngt Res Pract 5: 199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh G (1998). Care in knowledge creation. Calif Mngt Rev 40: 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger EC (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity . Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiig KM (1990). Expert Systems: A Manager's Guide . International Labour Office: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig KM (1997a). Integrating intellectual capital and knowledge management. Long Range Plann 30: 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiig KM (1997b). Knowledge management: Where did it come from and where will it go? Expert Syst Appl 13: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Hall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edwards, J., Ababneh, B., Hall, M. et al. Knowledge management: a review of the field and of OR's contribution. J Oper Res Soc 60 (Suppl 1), S114–S125 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2008.168

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2008.168

Keywords

Navigation