Skip to main content
Log in

Forecasting for inventory planning: a 50-year review

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Forecasting and planning for inventory management has received considerable attention from the Operational Research (OR) community over the last 50 years because of its implications for decision making, both at the strategic level of an organization and at the operational level. Many influential contributions have been made in this area, reflecting different perspectives that have evolved in divergent strands of the literature, namely: system dynamics, control theory and forecasting theory (both statistical and judgemental). Although this pluralism is healthy in terms of knowledge advancement, it also signifies the fragmentation of the OR discipline and the lack of cross-fertilization of ideas to develop more comprehensive approaches towards the resolution of the same issues. In this paper, the relevant literature is reviewed and synthesized to promote some convergence between these different approaches to inventory forecasting and planning. The review concludes with an inter-disciplinary agenda for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Notes

  1. Control theory is the inter-disciplinary branch of mathematics and engineering that deals with the behaviour of dynamical systems. Its applications overlap with many of the interests of the OR community, such as production and inventory problems, machine maintenance, and replacement and marketing. The interface between control theory and OR is discussed in Sethi and Thompson (2000).

References

  • Ackermann F, Eden C and Williams T (1997). Modeling for litigation: Mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches. Interfaces 27: 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adelson RM (1966). The dynamic behaviour of linear forecasting and scheduling rules. Opl Res Q 17: 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkermans H and Dellaert N (2005). The rediscovery of industrial dynamics: The contribution of system dynamics to supply chain management in a dynamic and fragmented world. Syst Dyn Rev 21: 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkermans H and van Helden K (2002). Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: A case study of interrelations between critical success factors. Eur J Inf Syst 11: 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkermans H and Vos B (2003). Amplification in service supply chain; an exploratory study from the telecom industry. Prod Opns Mngt 12: 204–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkermans H and Vos B (2004). Erratum: Amplification in service supply chain; an exploratory study from the telecom industry. Prod Opns Mngt 13: 200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong JS and Collopy F (1998). Integration of statistical methods and judgement for time series forecasting: Principles for empirical research. In: Wright G. and Goodwin P. (eds). Forecasting with Judgement. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand JWM (1986). Balancing production level variations and inventory variations in complex production systems. Int J Prod Res 24: 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessler SA and Zehna PW (1968). An application of servomechanisms to inventory. Nav Res Logist Q 15: 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd H and Tomlinson RC (1963). The stock control of engineering spares—A case study. Opl Res Q 14: 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP and Jenkins GM (1970). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden Day: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Jenkins GM and Reinsel GC (1994). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan JE (2007). Key assumptions in calculating the cost of forecast error. Foresight: Int J Appl Forecasting 8: 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan JE and Syntetos AA (2003). Intermittent demand forecasting: Size-interval methods based on average and smoothing. Paper presented at the International Conference on Quantitative Methods in Industry and Commerce, Athens, Greece.

  • Boylan JE and Williams MA (2001). Introducing forecasting and monitoring methods to an SME: The role of Soft Systems Methodology. In: Nicholls M.G., Clarke S. and Lehaney B. (eds). Mixed-mode Modelling: Mixing Methodologies for Organisational Intervention. Kluwer: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan JE, Syntetos AA and Sanders NR (2008). Qualitative system dynamics and the bullwhip effect. Paper presented at the 26th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Athens, Greece.

  • Brown RG (1951). A proposed definition of operations research. Opl Res Q 2: 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RG (1959). Statistical Forecasting for Inventory Control. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RG (1963). Smoothing, Forecasting and Prediction. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RG (1967). Decision Rules for Inventory Management. Holt, Reinhart and Winston: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn D and Wright G (1991). Interaction of judgemental and statistical forecasting methods: Issues and analysis. Mngt Sci 37: 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catt PM (2007). Assessing the cost of forecast error—A practical example. Foresight: Int J Appl Forecasting 7: 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield C (1978). Adaptive filtering: A critical assessment. J Opl Res Soc 29: 891–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield C, Koehler AB, Ord JK and Snyder RD (2001). A new look at models for exponential smoothing. J R Stat Soc D 50: 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H and Boylan JE (2007). Use of individual and group seasonal indices in subaggregate demand forecasting. J Opl Res Soc 58: 1660–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H and Boylan JE (2008). Empirical evidence on individual, group and shrinkage seasonal indices. Int J Forecasting 24: 525–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YF, Drezner Z, Ryan JK and Simchi-Levi D (2000). Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead-times and information. Mngt Sci 46: 436–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper T (1984). Improving inventory control systems—the ‘development testbed’ approach. Paper presented at the 26th National Operational Research Society Conference, Lancaster, UK.

  • Croston JD (1972). Forecasting and stock control for intermittent demands. Opl Res Q 23: 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das C and Tyagi R (1997). Role of inventory and transportation costs in determining the optimal degree of centralization. Logist Transport Rev 33: 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejonckheere J, Disney SM, Lambrecht MR and Towill DR (2003). Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach. Eur J Opl Res 147: 567–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejonckheere J, Disney SM, Lambrecht MR and Towill DR (2004). The impact of information enrichment on the bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective. Eur J Opl Res 153: 727–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker R, van Donselaar K and Ouwehand P (2004). How to use aggregation and combined forecasting to improve seasonal demand forecasts. Int J Prod Econ 90: 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deziel DP and Eilon S (1967). A linear production—inventory control rule. Prod Eng 43: 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disney SM and Hosoda T (2009). The benefit of altruistic behavior achieved by the order-up-to policy with unmatched proportional feedback controllers in a two-echelon supply chain. Int J Intell Syst, Tech Appl in press.

  • Disney SM, Chen YF, van de Velde W, Warburton R, Gaalman G, Lambrecht M and Towill DR (2006). Costing the bullwhip effect in supply chains. Paper presented at The Annual INFORMS Conference, Hong Kong.

  • Eaves AHC (2002). Forecasting for the ordering and stock holding of consumable spare parts. PhD thesis, Lanacster University, UK.

  • Eaves AHC and Kingsman BG (2004). Forecasting for the ordering and stock-holding of spare parts. J Opl Res Soc 55: 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C, Jones S and Sims D (1983). Messing About in Problems. Pergamon: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Ann Statist 7: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekern S (1981). Adaptive exponential smoothing revisited. J Opl Res Soc 32: 775–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fildes R, Nikolopoulos K, Crone S and Syntetos AA (2008). Forecasting and operational research: A review. J Opl Res Soc 59: 1150–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fildes R, Goodwin P, Lawrence M and Nikolopoulos K (2009). Effective forecasting and judgemental adjustments: An empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply chain planning. Int J Forecasting 25: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1958). Industrial dynamics—A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Bus Rev 36: 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Productivity Press: Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaalman GJ (1978). On the optimal time-invariant control of linear Gaussian non-quadratic problems. Int J Control 28: 635–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaalman G and Disney SM (2006). Optimal linear inventory replenishment policies in a two-stage supply chain with arbitrary lead-times. Paper presented at the Annual INFORMS Conference, Hong Kong.

  • Gaalman G and Disney SM (2009). On bullwhip in a family of order-up-to policies with ARMA(2,2) demand and arbitrary lead-times. Int J Prod Econ, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.024.

  • Gardner ES (1990). Evaluating forecasting performance in an inventory control system. Mngt Sci 36: 490–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner ES (2006). Exponential smoothing: The sate of the art—part II. Int J Forecasting 22: 637–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner ES and Dannenbring DG (1979). Using optimal policy surfaces to analyze aggregate inventory tradeoffs. Mngt Sci 25: 709–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner ES and Koehler AB (2005). Correspondence: Comments on a patented bootstrapping method for forecasting intermittent demand. Int J Forecasting 21: 617–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner ES and McKenzie E (1985). Forecasting trends in time-series. Mngt Sci 31: 1237–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin P (2000). Improving the voluntary integration of statistical forecasts and judgment. Int J Forecasting 16: 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin P (2002). Integrating management judgment with statistical methods to improve short-term forecasts. Omega: Int J Mngt Sci 30: 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin P and Fildes R (1999). Judgmental forecasts of time series affected by special events: Does providing a statistical forecast improve accuracy? J Behav Decis Making 12: 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubbström RW (1996). Stochastic properties of a production-inventory process with planned production using transform methodology. Int J Prod Econ 45: 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez RS, Solis AO and Mukhopadhyay S (2007). Lumpy demand forecasting using neural networks. Int J Prod Econ 111: 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PJ (1967). Exponential smoothing and short term sales forecasting. Mngt Sci 13: 821–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PJ and Davies O (1964). The use of cumulative sum (CUSUM) techniques for the control of product demand. Opns Res 12: 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PJ and Stevens CF (1971). A Bayesian approach to short-term forecasting. Opl Res Q 22: 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PJ and Stevens CF (1976). Bayesian forecasting. J R Stat Soc B 38: 205–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC (1989). Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt CC (1957). Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages. O.N.R. Memorandum no. 52, Carnegie Institute of Technology. Pittsburgh: Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt CC (2004a). Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages. Int J Forecasting 20: 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt CC (2004b). Author's retrospective on ‘Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages'. Int J Forecasting 20: 11–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoda T and Disney SM (2006a). On variance amplification in a three-echelon supply chain with minimum mean square error forecasting. Omega: Int J Mngt Sci 34: 344–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoda T and Disney SM (2006b). The governing dynamics of supply chains: The impact of altruistic behavior. Automatica 42: 1301–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoda T, Naim MM, Disney SM and Potter AT (2007). Is there a benefit to sharing market sales information? Linking theory and practice. Comput Ind Eng 54: 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston FR (1980). An interactive stock control system with a strategic management role. J Opl Res Soc 31: 1069–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston FR, Taylor SJ and Oliveria RMMC (1988). Setting company stock levels. J Opl Res Soc 39: 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jury EI (1964). Theory and Application of the z-transform Method. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jury EI (1976). Inners and Stability of Dynamic Systems. John Wiley and Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalman RE (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Trans ASME—J Basic Eng 82: 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen RD and Flores BE (2001). Forecasting practices of Canadian firms: Survey results and comparisons. Int J Prod Econ 70: 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolassa S, Schütz W, Boylan JE and Syntetos AA (2008). Judgemental changes to forecasts: higher inventories, unchanged out-of-stocks. Paper presented at the 28th International Symposium on Forecasting, Nice: France.

  • Kwan HW (1991). On the demand distributions of slow moving items. PhD thesis, Lancaster University, UK.

  • Lalwani CS, Disney SM and Towill DR (2006). Controllable, observable and stable state space representations of a generalized order-up-to policy. Int J Prod Econ 101: 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JR, Stephenson GG and Lampkin W (1961). A stock control policy for important spares in a two level stores system. Opl Res Q 12: 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, Padmanabhan V and Whang S (1997a). The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Mngt Rev 38: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, Padmanabhan V and Whang S (1997b). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Mngt Sci 43: 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, So KC and Tang CS (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Mngt Sci 46: 626–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim JS and O'Connor M (1995). Judgemental adjustment of initial forecasts: Its effectiveness and biases. J Behav Decis Making 8: 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee J (1958). Production Planning and Inventory Control. McGraw-Hill: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud MM (1992). Optimal inventory consolidation schemes: A portfolio effect analysis. J Bus Logist 13: 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maister DH (1976). Centralisation of inventories and the square root law. Int J Phys Dist & Mater Mngt 6: 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S, Andersen A, Carbone R, Fildes R, Hibon M, Lewandowski R, Newton J, Parzen E and Winkler R (1982). The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition. J Forecasting 1: 111–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S and Hibon M (2000). The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications. Int J Forecasting 16: 451–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews BP and Diamantopoulos A (1986). Managerial intervention in forecasting: An empirical investigation of forecast manipulation. Int J Res Market 3: 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews BP and Diamantopoulos A (1989). Judgemental revision of sales forecasts: A longitudinal extension. J Forecasting 8: 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews BP and Diamantopoulos A (1990). Judgmental revision of sales forecasts—Effectiveness of forecast selection. J Forecasting 9: 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews BP and Diamantopoulos A (1992). Judgmental revision of sales forecasts—The relative performance of judgementally revised versus nonrevised forecasts. J Forecasting 11: 569–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy TM, Davis DF, Golicic SL and Mentzer JT (2006). The evolution of sales forecasting management: A 20 year longitudinal study of forecasting practices. J Forecasting 24: 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DM and Williams D (2003). Shrinkage estimators of time series seasonal factors and their effect on forecast accuracy. Int J Forecasting 19: 669–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell GH (1962). Problems of controlling slow-moving enginering spares. Opl Res Q 13: 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorcroft JWD and Sterman JD (1992). Modeling for Learning Organizations. Productivity Press: Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth JF (1960). Optimal properties of exponentially weighted forecasts. J Am Stat Assoc 55: 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor M, Remus W and Griggs K (1993). Judgemental forecasting in times of change. Int J Forecasting 9: 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ord JK, Koehler AB and Snyder RD (1997). Estimation and prediction for a class of dynamic nonlinear statistical models. J Am Stat Assoc 92: 1621–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Y and Daganzo C (2006). Characterization of the bullwhip effect in linear, time-invariant supply chains: some formulae and tests. Mngt Sci 52: 1544–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paucar-Pecares A and Rodriguez-Ulloa R (2007). An application of soft systems dynamics methodology. J Opl Res Soc 58: 701–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pegels CC (1969). Exponential forecasting: Some new variations. Mngt Sci 12: 311–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popplewell K and Bonney MC (1987). The application of discrete linear control theory to the analysis and simulation of multi-product, multi-level production control systems. Int J Prod Res 25: 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porras EM and Dekker R (2008). An inventory control system for spare parts at a refinery: An empirical comparison of different reorder point methods. Eur J Opl Res 184: 101–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghunathan S (2001). Information sharing in a supply chain: A note on its value when demand is non-stationary. Mngt Sci 47: 605–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SA (1982). A general class of Holt-Winters type forecasting models. Mngt Sci 28: 808–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders N and Manrodt KB (1994). Forecasting practices in US corporations: Survey results. Interfaces 24: 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders N and Ritzman L (2001). Judgmental adjustments of statistical forecasts. In: Armstrong J.S. (ed). Principles of Forecasting. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sani B and Kingsman BG (1997). Selecting the best periodic inventory control and demand forecasting methods for low demand items. J Opl Res Soc 48: 700–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiß C (1975). Dynamic certainty equivalents in production smoothing theory. Int J Syst Sci 6: 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi SP and Thompson GL (2000). Optimal Control Theory. Springer Series in Applications to Management Science and Economics,2nd edn. Springer: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shale EA, Boylan JE and Johnston FR (2006). Forecasting for intermittent demand: The estimation of an unbiased average. J Opl Res Soc 57: 588–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver EA, Pyke DF and Peterson R (1998). Inventory management and production planning and scheduling, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1952). On the application of servomechanism theory in the study of production control. Econometrica 20: 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder RD (1985). Recursive estimation of dynamic linear models. J R Stat Soc B 47: 272–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr MK and Miller DW (1962). Inventory Control: Theory and Practice. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (1989). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperception of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Mngt Sci 35: 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syntetos AA and Boylan JE (2001). On the bias of intermittent demand estimates. Int J Prod Econ 71: 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syntetos AA and Boylan JE (2005). The accuracy of intermittent demand estimates. Int J Forecasting 21: 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syntetos AA and Boylan JE (2006). Comments on the attribution of an intermittent demand estimator. Int J Forecasting 22: 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syntetos AA and Boylan JE (2008). Demand forecasting adjustments for service-level achievement. IMA J Mngt Math 19: 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syntetos AA, Nikolopoulos K, Boylan JE, Fildes R and Goodwin P (2009). Integrating management judgement into intermittent demand forecasts. Int J Prod Econ, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.011.

  • Taylor JW (2003). Exponential smoothing with a damped multiplicative trend. Int J Forecasting 19: 715–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunter R and Sani B (2009). On the bias of Croston's forecasting method. Eur J Opl Res 194: 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towill DR (1982). Dynamic analysis of an inventory and order based production control system. Int J Prod Res 20: 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towill DR, Lambrecht MR, Disney SM and Dejonckheere J (2003). Explicit filters and supply chain design. J Purchas Supply Mngt 9: 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigg D (1964). Monitoring a forecasting system. Opl Res Q 15: 271–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigg D and Leach A (1967). Exponential smoothing with an adaptive response rate. Opl Res Q 18: 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsypkin YZ (1964). Sampling Systems Theory and Its Application. Pergamon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner DS (1990). The role of judgment in macroeconomic forecasting. J Forecasting 9: 315–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassian HJ (1955). Application of discrete variable servo theory to inventory control. J Oper Res Soc Am 3: 272–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanke PF and Zinn W (2004). Strategic logistics decision making. Int J Phys Dist Logist Mngt 34: 466–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemain TR, Smart CN, Shockor JH and DeSautels PA (1994). Forecasting intermittent demand in manufacturing: a comparative evaluation of Croston's method. Int J Forecasting 10: 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemain TR, Smart CN and Schwarz HF (2004). A new approach to forecasting intermittent demand for service parts inventories. Int J Forecasting 20: 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters P (1960). Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages. Mngt Sci 6: 324–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme EF (1982). System dynamics in perspective. J Opl Res Soc 33: 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner A (1971). An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn W, Levy M and Bowersox DJ (1989). Measuring the effect of inventory centralization/decentralization on aggregate safety stock: The ‘square root law’ revisited. J Bus Logist 10: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The conceptual work described in this paper has been funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, UK) Grant no. EP/F012632/1. More information on this project may be obtained at http://www.mams.salford.ac.uk/CORAS/Projects/Bridging_the_Gap/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A A Syntetos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Syntetos, A., Boylan, J. & Disney, S. Forecasting for inventory planning: a 50-year review. J Oper Res Soc 60 (Suppl 1), S149–S160 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2008.173

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2008.173

Keywords

Navigation