Skip to main content
Log in

Enterprise risk management: coping with model risk in a large bank

  • Case-Oriented Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Enterprise risk management (ERM) has become an important topic in today's more complex, interrelated global business environment, replete with threats from natural, political, economic, and technical sources. Banks especially face financial risks, as the news makes ever more apparent in 2008. This paper demonstrates support to risk management through validation of predictive scorecards for a large bank. The bank developed a model to assess account creditworthiness. The model is validated and compared to credit bureau scores. Alternative methods of risk measurement are compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander GJ and Baptista AM (2004). A comparison of VaR and CVaR constraints on portfolio selection with the mean-variance model . Mngt Sci 50(9): 1261–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anders U and Sandstedt M (2003). An operational risk scorecard approach . Risk 16(1): 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranoff EG (2004). Risk management: A focus on a more holistic approach three years after September 11 . J Insur Regul 22(4): 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigio D, Edgeman RL and Ferleman T (2004). Six sigma availability management of information technology in the Office of the Chief Technology Officer of Washington, DC . Total Qual Mngt 15(5–6): 679–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calandro J Jr, and Lane S (2006). An introduction to the enterprise risk scorecard . Measur Bus Excel 10(3): 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caudle S (2005). Homeland security . Public Perform Mngt Rev 28(3): 352–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez-Demoulin V, Embrechts P and Nešlehová J (2006). Quantitative models for operational risk: Extremes, dependence and aggregation . J Bank Fin 30: 2635–2658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouhy M, Galai D and Mark R (1998). Model risk . J Fin Eng 7(3/4): 267–288 (reprinted in Model risk: Concepts, calibration and pricing) In: Gibson, R. (ed). Risk Book, 2000, pp. 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouhy M, Galai D and Mark R (2000). A comparative analysis of current credit risk models . J Bank Fin 24: 59–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson G (2001). Enterprise risk management: Its origins and conceptual foundation . Geneva Pap Risk Insur 26(3): 360–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsinger H, Lehar A and Summer M (2006). Risk assessment for banking systems . Mngt Sci 52(9): 1301–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia R, Renault É and Tsafack G (2007). Proper conditioning for coherent VaR in portfolio management . Mngt Sci 53(3): 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herath HSB and Bremser WG (2005). Real-option valuation of research and development investments: Implications for performance measurement . Mngt Audit J 20(1): 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson T, Lindé J and Roszbach K (2006). Internal ratings systems, implied credit risk and the consistency of banks' risk classification policies . J Bank Fin 30: 1899–1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS and Norton DP (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance . Harvard Bus Rev 70(1): 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS and Norton DP (2006). Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies . Harvard Business School Press Books: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn A (2004). How to manage risk—Enterprise-wide . Strat Fin 86(5): 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lhabitant F (2000). Coping with model risk . In: Lore M. and Borodovsky L. (eds). The Professional Handbook of Financial Risk Management. Butterworth-Heinemann: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miccolis J (2003). ERM lessons across industries, http://www.irmi.com/Expert/Articles/2003/Miccolis03.aspx.

  • Papalexandris A, Ioannou G, Prastacos G and Soderquist KE (2005). An integrated methodology for putting the balanced scorecard into action . Eur Mngt J 23(2): 214–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandizzo S (2005). Risk mapping and key risk indicators in operational risk management . Econ Notes Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA 34(2): 231–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiechewicz W (2001). Case study: Implementing enterprise risk management . Bank Account Fin 14(4): 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobehart J and Keenan S (2001). Measuring default accurately . Credit Risk Special Rep, Risk 14: 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor N (2007). A note on the importance of overnight information in risk management models . J Bank Fin 31: 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H (2004). The use of credit scoring in the mortgage industry . J Fin Serv Market 9(2): 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu D, Olson D (2008). Enterprise Risk Management: Credit Scoring in Finance Operations. Working paper, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D Wu.

Appendix. Informal definitions

Appendix. Informal definitions

  1. a)

    Bad accounts refer to cases 90 days delinquent or worse, accounts closed with a ‘NA (non-accrual)’ status or that were written-off.

  2. b)

    Good accounts were defined as those that did not meet the bad definition.

  3. c)

    Credit score is a number that is based on a statistical analysis of a person's credit report, and is used to represent the creditworthiness of that person—the likelihood that the person will pay his or her debts.

  4. d)

    A credit bureau is a company that collects information from various sources and provides consumer credit information on individual consumers for a variety of uses.

  5. e)

    Custom score refers to the score assigned to existing customers or new applicants.

  6. f)

    Beacon score is the credit score produced at the most recognized agency Equifax in Canada.

  7. g)

    The FICO score is the credit score from Fair Isaac Corporation, a publicly traded corporation that created the best-known and most widely used credit score model in the United States.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, D., Olson, D. Enterprise risk management: coping with model risk in a large bank. J Oper Res Soc 61, 179–190 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2008.144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2008.144

Keywords

Navigation