Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation error in regulatory capital requirements: theoretical implications for consumer bank profitability

  • Part 1: Consumer Credit Risk Modelling
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Despite the topic's societal importance and despite progress in bank research, a lack of consensus exists concerning either the desirability of bank regulation or its optimal design. Enforcement of minimum bank capital standards has been shown to enhance bank stability, but also serves as a potential source of incremental costs, some of which are subtle. Such widely ambiguous research results point to the need for theoretical research regarding capital regulation across diverse banking systems. Along the latter lines, consumer bank issues have been generally neglected. This paper theoretically examines the performance implications of misestimating the regulatory capital requirement for a stylised consumer bank. For our stylised consumer bank, we prove that misestimation, irrespective of its direction, results in lower economic profits and, hence, value. Conclusions and implications for future work are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Notes

  1. For banks, capital refers specifically to equity whereas to non-depository firms, capital includes all funding sources, that is debt, equity, and quasi-equity. Capital requirement, in this paper, refers to equity requirement.

References

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2006). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards—A Revised Framework, Comprehensive Version. Bank for International Settlements: Basel.

  • Beling PA, Covaliu Z and Oliver RM (2005a). Optimal scoring cutoff policies and efficient frontiers . J Opl Res Soc 56: 1016–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beling PA, Jiang W, Oliver RM and Overstreet GM (2005b). Misstatement of regulatory capital requirements: Some implications for retail banking profits. Proceedings of Credit Scoring and Credit Control IX. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

  • Berger AN (1995). The relationship between capital and earnings in banking . J Money Credit Bank 27: 432–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland TE, Weston JF and Shastri K (2005). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy . Addison Wesley: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook J, Edelman D and Thomas L (2007). Recent developments in consumer credit risk assessment . Eur J Opl Res 183: 1447–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Andrade FW and Thomas LC (2005). Structural models in consumer credit. Proceedings of Credit Scoring and Credit Control IX. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

  • De Andrade FW and Thomas LC (2007). Structural models in consumer credit . Eur J Opl Res 183: 1569–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond DW and Rajan RG (2000). A theory of bank capital . J Financ 55: 2431–2465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest A (2005). Low default portfolios: Theory and practice. Proceedings of Credit Scoring and Credit Control IX. New York: University of Edinburgh.

  • Gup BE (2004). The New Basel Capital Accord . Texere: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez J (2004). The empirical relationship between average asset correlation, firm probability of default, and asset size . J Financ Intermed 13: 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates . J Financ 29: 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller M (1995). Do the M&M propositions apply to banks? J Bank Financ 19: 483–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F and Miller M (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment . Am Econ Rev 48: 261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F and Miller M (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction . Am Econ Rev 53: 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RM and Thomas LC (2005). How Basel will affect optimal cutoffs. Proceedings of Credit Scoring and Credit Control IX, University of Edinburgh.

  • Oliver RM and Wells E (2001). Efficient frontier cutoff policies in credit portfolios . J Opl Res Soc 52: 1025–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perli R and Nayda W (2004). Economic and regulatory capital allocation for revolving retail exposures . J Ban Financ 28: 789–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pluto K and Tasche D (2005). Estimating probabilities for low default portfolios. Proceedings of Credit Scoring and Credit Control IX. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

  • Santos JAC (2000). Bank capital regulation in contemporary banking theory: A review of the literature. BIS Working Paper 90.

  • Thomas L, Edelman D and Crook J (2002). Credit Scoring and Its Applications . SIAM: Philadelphia.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • VanHoose D (2007). Theories of bank behavior under capital regulation . J Ban Financ 31: 432–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasicek O (2002). Loan portfolio value . Risk 15: 160–162.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A number of the ideas presented here were first considered in a paper given at the conference Credit Scoring and Credit Control IX (Beling et al, 2005b). The authors acknowledge the substantial contributions to that work made by Wei Jiang, who was at that time a student at the University of Virginia.

The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers, who provided many helpful comments and suggestions for improvement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beling, P., Overstreet, G. & Rajaratnam, K. Estimation error in regulatory capital requirements: theoretical implications for consumer bank profitability. J Oper Res Soc 61, 381–392 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.109

Keywords

Navigation