Skip to main content
Log in

Challenges of operations research practice in agricultural value chains

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Operations research (OR) methodologies in optimization have been extensively applied to problems in different agricultural value chains in recent years. We take a critical stock take of such applications to date, and reflect on their contribution to value chain sustainability and resilience. The stock take shows that the rate of industry or policy adoption has been limited, partly due to the complex interactions across the segments of agricultural value chains, and the mathematical representation being different to the way the decision maker understands the problem. OR practice in agriculture is also being asked to cover greater spatial scales and engage more stakeholders, and is required to embrace resilience and sustainability objectives. A single-minded focus on optimizing parts of these complex systems without considering the whole system is no longer adequate, and new methods and approaches are required. Complex systems science methods are being applied to analyse the dynamics of complex social–ecological systems, and are starting to find a home in industrial supply chain analysis. We demonstrate how three complex system methods, agent-based modelling, dynamical systems modelling and network analysis, can be applied to agricultural value chains as a means of gaining insights into system dynamics under different and dynamic conditions. The relevance and utility of OR in ensuring the success of agricultural value chains into the future will require practitioners to understand and model value chains as complex adaptive systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahumada O and Villalobos JR ( 2009 ). Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review . Eur J Opl Res 195 : 1 – 20 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderies JM, Janssen MA and Walker BH ( 2002 ). Grazing management, resilience, and the dynamics of a fire-driven rangeland system . Ecosystems 5 ( 1 ): 23 – 44 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annetts JE and Audsley E ( 2002 ). Multiple objective linear programming for environmental farm planning . J Opl Res Soc 53 : 933 – 943 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antle JM, Capalbo SM, Elliott ET, Hunt W, Mooney S and Paustian K ( 2001 ). Research needs for understanding and predicting the behaviour of managed systems: Lessons from the study of agroecosystems . Ecosystems 4 : 723 – 735 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer AA, Thorburn PT and Higgins AJ ( 2009 ). Evaluating alternate strategic options for agricultural value chains . J Chain Netw Sci 8 ( 2 ): 131 – 141 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon M, Rasmequan S and Russ S ( 2002 ). A new paradigm for computer-based decision support . Decis Support Syst 33 : 127 – 142 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin O, Crona B and Ernstson H ( 2006 ). Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecol Soc 11 ( 2 ).

  • Boehlje M ( 1999 ). Structural changes in the agricultural industries: How do we measure, analyze and understand them? Am J Agr Econ 81 : 1028 – 1041 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehlje M and Schrader LF ( 1996 ). Agriculture in the 21st Century . J Prod Agric 9 : 335 – 341 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonne K and Verbeke W ( 2008 ). Religious values informing halal meat production and the control and delivery of halal credence quality . Anim Hum Val 25 : 35 – 47 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgine P and Johnson J ( 2006 ). Living roadmap for complex systems science . Open Network of Centres of Excellence in Complex Systems–Project FP6-IST 29814, www.once-cs.net, 71 pp .

  • Camarena EA, Gracia C and Cabrera Sixto JM ( 2004 ). A mixed integer linear programming machinery selection model for multi-farm systems . Biosyst Eng 87 : 145 – 154 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caridi M and Cavalieri S ( 2004 ). Multi-agent systems in production planning and control: An overview . Prod Plan Control 15 ( 2 ): 106 – 118 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM and Abel N ( 2001 ). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4 : 765 – 781 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M and Peck H ( 2004 ). Building the resilient supply chain . Int J Logist Mngt 15 : 1 – 14 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M and Rutherford C ( 2004 ). Creating supply chain resilience through agile six sigma . Crit Eye ( June–August ): 24–28 .

  • Costanza R, Wainger L, Folke C and Mäler KG ( 1993 ). Modeling complex ecological economic systems: Toward an evolutionary, dynamic understanding of people and nature . BioScience 43 ( 8 ): 545 – 555 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby-Dowman K, Barker S, Audsley E and Parsons D ( 2000 ). A two-stage stochastic programming with recourse model for determining robust planting plans in horticulture . J Opl Res Soc 51 : 83 – 89 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley AE, Parker JW and Blair HT ( 2005 ). Modelling of transport costs and logistics for on-farm milk segregation in New Zealand dairying . Comput Electron Agr 48 : 75 – 91 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada-Flores S ( 2007 ). Market analysis for energy savings in the cold chain . Packaging, Storage & Transport Report No. 51. Food Science Australia .

  • Fletcher CS and Hilbert DW ( 2007 ). Resilience in landscape exploitation systems . Ecol Model 201 ( 3–4 ): 440 – 452 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L and Holling CS ( 2004 ). Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management . Annu Rev Ecol, Evolut Syst 35 : 557 – 581 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frayret JM, A'Amours S, Rouseau A and Harvesy S ( 2005 ). Agent based supply chain planning in the forest products industry . Network Organisation Technology Research Centre: Universite Laval, Quebec, Canada .

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigler JK, Hendrix EMT, Heesen RA, van den Hazelkamp VGW and Meerdink G ( 2002 ). On optimisation of agri chains by dynamic programming . Eur J Opl Res 139 : 613 – 625 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AP, Harboe R and Tabucanon MT ( 2000 ). Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making for crop area planning in Narmada river basin . Agri Syst 63 : 1 – 18 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haouari M and Azaiez M ( 2001 ). Optimal cropping patterns under water deficits . Eur J Opl Res 130 : 133 – 146 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happe K, Damgaard M, Osuch A, Sattler C, Zander P, Uthes S and Schuler J ( 2006 ). CAP-reform and the provision of non-commodity outputs in Brandenburg . Agrarwirtschaft 55 ( 5 ): 268 – 279 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins AJ, Antony G, Sandell G, Davies I, Prestwidge DB and Andrew B ( 2004 ). A framework for integrating a complex harvesting and transport system for sugar production . Agri Syst 82 : 99 – 115 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins AJ, Thorburn PJ, Archer AA and Jakku E ( 2007 ). Opportunities for value chain research in sugar industries . Agri Syst 94 : 611 – 621 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins AJ, Witherspoon B and Estrada-Flores S ( 2009 ). Analysis of food safety risks in transport and distribution of perishable food . In : Proceedings of the Japan–Australia Workshop on Material Flows and Resource Productivity, Canberra, 26–27 February 2009, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems: Canberra .

  • Janssen MA, Bodin O, Anderies JM, Elmqvist T, Ernstson H, McAllister R, Olsson P and Ryan P ( 2006 ). Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social–ecological systems . Ecol Soc 10 : 11 – 15 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings N and Wooldridge M ( 1998 ). Agent Technology . Springer: New York .

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen DJ and Hult GTM ( 2007 ). Bridging organisation theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains . J Opns Mngt 25 ( 2 ): 573 – 580 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiahara T ( 2003 ). Multi-agent based supply chain modelling with dynamic environment . Int J Prod Econ 85 : 263 – 269 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou P, Zhou Z, Chen Y and Ai W ( 2004 ). Study on multi-agent based agile supply chain management . Int J Adv Manuf Tech 23 : 197 – 203 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas MT and Chhajed D ( 2004 ). Applications of location analysis in agriculture: A survey . J Opl Res Soc 55 : 561 – 578 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason K, Doyle P and Wong V ( 2006 ). Market orientation and quasi-integration: Adding value through relationships . Indust Market Mngt 35 : 140 – 155 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister RRJ, Cheers B, Darbas T, Davies J, Richards C, Robinson CJ, Ashley M, Fernando D and Maru YT ( 2008 ). Social networks in arid Australia: A review of concepts and evidence . Rangeland J 30 : 167 – 176 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCown RL ( 2002 ). Locating agricultural decision support systems in the troubled past and socio-technical complexity of ‘models for management' . Agri Syst 74 : 11 – 25 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller CJ, Higgins AJ, Archer AA, Fletcher CS, Ton T and McAllister RRJ ( 2007 ). Meta-organizational resilience: Emerging thoughts on the resilience of complex agricultural value chains . In : Kay R and Richardson K ( eds ). Building and Sustaining Resilience in Complex Organizations . ISCE Publishing : USA, pp 65–83 .

  • Morgan NA, Kaleka A and Gooner RA ( 2007 ). Focal supplier opportunism in supermarket retailer category management . J Opns Mngt 25 : 512 – 527 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman L and Dale A ( 2005 ). Network structure diversity and proactive resilience building: A response to Tompkins and Adger . Ecol Soc 10 ( 1 ).

  • Ortmann FG ( 2005 ). Modelling the South African fresh fruit export supply chain . Masters of Science Thesis, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa .

  • Pannell DJ ( 1996 ). Lessons from a decade of whole-farm modelling in Western Australia . Rev Agr Econ 18 ( 3 ): 373 – 383 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannell DJ ( 2006 ). Flat-earth economics: The far-reaching consequences of flat payoff functions in economic decision making . Rev Agr Econ 28 ( 4 ): 553 – 566 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker DC, Manson SM, Janssen MA, Hoffmann MJ and Deadman P ( 2002 ). Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change : A review . LUCC Rep. Series No. 6, International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP) .

  • Perona M and Miragliotta G ( 2004 ). Complexity management and supply chain performance assessment. A field study and conceptual framework . Int J Prod Econ 90 : 103 – 115 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power D ( 2005 ). Supply chain management integration and implementation: A literature review . Supply Chain Mngt Int J 10 : 252 – 263 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qingzhen Z, Changyu W, Zhimin Z, Yunxiang Z and Chuanjiang W ( 1991 ). The application of operations research in the optimisation of agricultural production . Opns Res 39 : 194 – 205 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recio B, Rubio F and Criado JA ( 2003 ). A decision support system for farm planning using AgriSupport II . Decis Support Syst 36 : 189 – 203 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DT, Brown DG, Parker DC, Schreinemachers P, Janssen MA, Huigen M, Wittmer H, Gotts N, Promburom P, Irwin E, Berger T, Gatzweiler F and Barnaud C ( 2007 ). Comparison of empirical methods for building agent-based models in land use science . J Land Use Sci 2 ( 1 ): 31 – 55 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez LM and Nagi R ( 2001 ). A review of agile manufacturing systems . Int J Prod Res 39 ( 16 ): 3561 – 3600 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreinemachers P, Berger T and Aune JB ( 2007 ). Simulating soil fertility and poverty dynamics in Uganda : A bio-economic multi-agent systems approach . Ecol Econ . 64 : 387–401 .

  • Sheffi Y and Rice JB ( 2005 ). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise . MIT SLOAN Mngt Rev 47 : 41 – 48 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen W, Norrie DH and Barthes JP ( 2001 ). Multi-Agent Systems for Concurrent Intelligent Design and Manufacturing . Taylor and Francis: London, UK .

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Srbljinovic A and Skunca O ( 2003 ). An introduction to agent based modelling and simulation of social processes . Interdiscipl Description Complex Syst 1 ( 1-2 ): 1 – 8 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Surana A, Kumara S, Greaves M and Reghavan UN ( 2005 ). Supply-chain networks: A complex adaptive systems perspective . Int J Prod Res 43 : 4235 – 4265 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatsiopoulos IP and Tolis AJ ( 2003 ). Economic aspects of the cotton-stalk biomass logistics and comparison of supply chain methods . Biomass Bioenerg 24 : 199 – 214 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn P, Archer A, Hobson P, Higgins A, Sandell G, Prestwidge D, Andrew B, Antony G, McDonald L, Downs P and Juffs R ( 2006 ). Value chain analysis of whole crop harvesting to maximise co-generation . In : Hogarth DM (ed) . Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 28th Conference, ASSCT ; Mackay, pp 37–48 .

  • Trienekens JH and Beulens A ( 2001 ). Views on inter-enterprise relationships . Prod Plan Control 12 : 466 – 477 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine I ( 2005 ). An emerging model of a systems agriculturalist . Syst Res Behav Sci 22 : 109 – 118 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa A ( 2002 ). Emerging trends in large-scale supply chain management . Int J Prod Res 40 : 3487 – 3498 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonderembse MA, Uppal M, Huang S and Dismukes J ( 2006 ). Designing supply chains: Towards theory development . Int J Prod Econ 100 : 223 – 238 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B and Salt D ( 2006 ). Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World . Island Press: Washington, DC .

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR and Kinzig A ( 2004 ). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems . Ecol Soc 9 ( 2 ).

  • Walker B, Gunderson L, Kinzig A, Carpenter S and Schultz L ( 2006 ). A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social–ecological systems . Ecol Soc 11 ( 1 ).

  • Weintraub A and Romero C ( 2006 ). Operations research models and the management of agricultural and forestry resources: A review and comparison . Interfaces 36 ( 5 ): 446 – 457 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White L and Lee GJ ( 2009 ). Operational research and sustainable development: Tackling the social dimension . Eur J Opl Res 193 : 683 – 692 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouda FHE, van Beek P, van der Vorst P and Tacke H ( 2002 ). An application of mixed-integer linear programming models on the redesign of supply network of Nutricia Dairy & Drinks Group in Hungary . OR Spektrum 24 : 449 – 465 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr David Hilbert, Dr Peter Stone, Dr Oswald Marinoni and the anonymous reviewers of Journal of the Operational Research Society for their improvements to earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A J Higgins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Higgins, A., Miller, C., Archer, A. et al. Challenges of operations research practice in agricultural value chains. J Oper Res Soc 61, 964–973 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.57

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.57

Keywords

Navigation