Skip to main content
Log in

A cover-based competitive location model

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

In this paper we propose a new approach to estimating market share captured by competing facilities. The approach is based on cover location models. Each competing facility has a ‘sphere of influence’ determined by its attractiveness level. More attractive facilities have a larger radius of the sphere of influence. The buying power of a customer within the sphere of influence of several facilities is equally divided among the competing facilities. The buying power of a customer within the sphere of influence of no facility is lost. Assuming the presence of competition in the area, the objective is to add a number of new facilities to a chain of existing facilities in such a way that the increase of market share captured by the chain is maximized. The model is formulated and analysed. Optimal and heuristic solution algorithms are designed. Computational experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alp O, Drezner Z and Erkut E (2003). An efficient genetic algorithm for the p-median problem . Ann Opns Res 122: 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros AI (1998). Discrete and Fractional Programming Techniques for Location Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers: North Holland.

  • Beasley JE (1990). OR-library—distributing test problems by electronic mail. J Op Res Soc 41: 1069–1072. Also available at http://people.brunel.ac.uk/~mastjjb/jeb/orlib/pmedinfo.html.

  • Berman O (1994). The p maximal cover—p partial center problem on networks . Eur J Opl Res 72: 432–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman O and Drezner Z (2008). The p-median problem under uncertainty . Eur J Opl Res 189: 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman O, Drezner Z and Wesolowsky GO (2005). The facility and transfer points location problem . Int Trans Opl Res 12: 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman O and Krass D (2002). The generalized maximal covering location problem . Comput Opns Res 29: 563–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black W (1984). Choice-set definition in patronage modeling . J Retailing 60: 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canovas L and Pelegrin B (1992). Improving some heuristic algorithms for the rectangular p-cover problem . In: Moreno-Perez JA (ed). Proceedings of the VI Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Locational Analysis. Universidad De La Laguna: Tenerife, Spain, pp. 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A and Cooper WW (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals . Nav Res Logist Q 9: 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen DZ, Daescu O, Dai Y, Katoh N, Wu X and Xu J (2005). Efficient algorithms and implementations for optimizing the sum of linear fractional functions with applications . J Comb Optim 9: 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christaller W (1966). Central Places in Southern Germany . Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church RL and ReVelle C (1974). The maximal covering location problem . Pap Reg Sci Assoc 32: 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WAV (1968). Consumer travel patterns and the concept of range . Ann Assoc Am Geogr 58: 386–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WAV and Rushton G (1970). Models of intra-urban consumer behavior and their implications for central place theory . Econ Geogr 46: 486–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Current J, Daskin M and Schilling D (2002). Discrete network location models . In: Drezner Z and Hamacher H (eds). Facility Location: Applications and Theory. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, pp. 81–118.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daskin MS (1995). Network and Discrete Location: Models, Algorithms, and Applications . John Wiley & Sons: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T (1994a). Locating a single new facility among existing unequally attractive facilities . J Reg Sci 34: 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T (1994b). Optimal continuous location of a retail facility, facility attractiveness, and market share: An interactive model . J Retailing 70: 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T (1995). Competitive facility location in the plane . In: Drezner Z (ed). Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. Springer: NY, pp. 285–300.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T (1998). Location of multiple retail facilities with limited budget constraints – in continuous space . J Retailing Consum Serv 5: 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T and Drezner Z (1996). Competitive facilities: Market share and location with random utility . J Reg Sci 36: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T and Drezner Z (2004). Finding the optimal solution to the huff competitive location model . Comput Mngt Sci 1: 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T and Drezner Z (2008). Lost demand in a competitive environment . J Opl Res Soc 59: 362–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T, Drezner Z and Salhi S (2002). Solving the multiple competitive facilities location problem . Eur J Opl Res 142: 138–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z (1981). On a modified one-center model . Mngt Sci 27: 848–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z (1982). Competitive location strategies for two facilities . Reg Sci Urban Econ 12: 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z (1986). The p-cover problem . Eur J Opl Res 26: 312–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Suzuki A and Drezner T (2007). Locating multiple facilities in a planar competitive environment . J Opns Res Soc Japan 50: 1001–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Wesolowsky GO and Drezner T (1998). On the logit approach to competitive facility location . J Reg Sci 38: 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Wesolowsky GO and Drezner T (2004). The gradual covering problem . Nav Res Log 51: 841–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk LE and Palocsay SW (1992). Optimizing the sum of linear fractional functions . In: Floudas CA and Pardalos PM (eds). Recent Advances in Global Optimization (Princeton Series in Computer Sciences). Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, pp. 221–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund RW and Jarre F (2001). Solving the sum-of-ratios problem by an interior point method . J Global Optim 19: 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover F (1986). Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence . Comput Opns Res 13: 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover F and Laguna M (1997). Tabu Search . Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A and Craig CS (1986). An approach to determining optimal location for new services . J Market Res 23: 354–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A and Craig CS (1991). FRANSYS: A franchise distribution system location model . J Retailing 67: 466–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A and Rushton G (1987). Spatial Analysis and Location-Allocation Models . Van Nostrand Reinhold Company: NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi SL (1983). On locating new facilities in a competitive environment . Eur J Opl Res 12: 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi SL (1986). p-Median theorems for competitive locations . Ann Opns Res 6: 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi SL (1990). Locations with spatial interactions: Competitive locations and games . In: Mirchandani PB and Francis RL (eds). Discrete Location Theory. Wiley-Interscience: New York, pp. 439–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy G, Littlewood JE and Pólya G (1952). Inequalities, 2nd edn.. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1929). Stability in competition . Econ J 39: 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff DL (1964). Defining and estimating a trade area . J Marketing 28: 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff DL (1966). A programmed solution for approximating an optimum retail location . Land Econs 42: 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelat CD and Vecchi MP (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing . Sci 220: 671–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi G and Tadei R (1984). Random utility demand models and service location . Reg Sci Urban Econ 14: 399–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losch A (1954). The Economics of Location . Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megiddo N, Zemel E and Hakimi SL (1983). The maximum coverage location problem . SIAM J Algebra Discr 4: 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesterov Y and Nemirovski A (1995). An interior point method for generalized linear-fractional programming . Math Program 69: 177–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plastria F (2002). Continuous covering location problems . In: Drezner Z and Hamacher H (eds). Facility Location: Applications and Theory. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, pp. 38–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly WJ (1931). The Law of Retail Gravitation . Knickerbocker Press: NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle C (1986). The maximum capture or ‘sphere of influence' location problem: Hotelling revisited on a network . J Reg Sci 26: 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle C, Toregas C and Falkson L (1976). Applications of the location set covering problem . Geogr Anal 8: 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling DA, Vaidyanathan J and Barkhi R (1993). A review of covering problems in facility location . Location Sci 1: 25–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra D and ReVelle C (1995). Competitive location in discrete space . In: Drezner Z (ed). Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. Springer: NY, pp. 367–386.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teitz MB and Bart P (1968). Heuristic methods for estimating the generalized vertex median of a weighted graph . Opns Res 16: 955–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson-Gandy C (1982). Heuristic procedures for the m-partial cover problem on a plane . Eur J Opl Res 11: 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller RE, Achabal DD and Brown LA (1980). Market penetration and locational conflict in franchise systems . Decis Sci 11: 58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z Drezner.

Appendix

Appendix

A.1 First upper bound (UB 1)

Since ∑ j=1 N a ij x j ⩾0,

where with the provision that if F i +C i =0, substitute C i =1 (and F i =0).

The following knapsack problem yields an upper bound for the solution of (4) or (6):

subject to:

The solution to this knapsack problem, UB 1, is the sum of the p largest values of γ j .

A.2 Second upper bound (UB 2)

As the arithmetic mean is greater than or equal to the geometric mean:

with the rule when F i +C i =0.

Consider the following identity:

It can be written as with the rule that when F i +C i =0, C i =0, in the first term and C i =1 in the second term.

By the Schwartz inequality (Hardy et al, 1952) ({∑ i=1 n a i b i }2⩽∑ i=1 n a i 2 i=1 n b i 2):

with the rule that when F i +C i =0,

To implement UB 2 (A.4) in conjunction with UB 1, that is to use as an upper bound min{UB 1,UB 2}, calculate: UB 1 and If ¼K<UB 1 use as upper bound otherwise, use UB 1 as the upper bound.

A.3 Third upper bound (UB 3)

In developing UB 2 we used inequalities based on a base of ‘2’, that is, the arithmetic mean is greater than or equal to the geometric mean and the Schwartz inequality. We can develop formulas based on a base of θ>1 (not necessarily integer), which reduces to UB 2 when θ=2 is used. Once the best value of θ is found, UB 3 must be better than UB 2 (or equal to UB 2 when the best θ is equal to 2). To construct UB 3 we need the following lemma.

Lemma 1

  • For θ⩾1, a,b>0: which reduces to for θ=2.

Proof

  • Since the log function is concave, for x,y>0 and 0⩽λ⩽1: log(λ x+(1−λ)y)⩾λlogx+(1−λ)logy. Thus, λ x+(1−λ)yx λ y 1−λ. Substituting a=λ x and b=(1−λ)y yields

    Substituting

By Lemma 1, when , which reduces to the property that the arithmetic mean is greater than or equal to the geometric mean when θ=2 is used. When F i +C i =0, because the sum is integer. This inequality leads to:

with the agreement that if F i +C i =0 then in the first term and in the second term.

We now replace the Schwartz inequality with the Holder inequality (Hardy et al, 1952)

which reduces to the Schwartz inequality for θ=2. This yields:

which reduces to UB 2 when θ=2. When F i +C i =0 then substitute

Define

then UB 3=min θ⩾1{F(θ)}.

To simplify the calculation let F(θ)=λ(θ)UB 1; define μ; where

then UB 3=λ UB 1 where λ=min θ⩾1{λ(θ)}. The θ that minimizes λ(θ) is denoted by θ *.

By substitution

Also,

The derivative of ln λ(θ) following some algebraic manipulation is:

Lemma 2

  • .

Proof

  • Let Then

Lemma 3

  • lim θ → 1 λ(θ)=1 where λ(θ) is defined by (A.7) .

Proof

  • When β>0 the result is trivial by Lemma 2. When β=0, it is easily verified by (A.8) that the limit of ln λ(θ) is zero. □

We distinguish between three cases:

Case 1 :

β=0. Equating the derivative of ln λ(θ) to zero by (A.9) yields

Therefore, and Consequently,

Case 2 :

β⩾1. By (A.9): Therefore, lnλ(θ) is monotonically increasing for θ⩾1. Therefore, θ *=1, thus λ(θ *)=1 and UB 3=UB 1.

Case 3 :

0<β<1.

Theorem 4

  • θ * satisfies the equation .

Proof

  • By equating the derivative of (A.9) to zero:

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drezner, T., Drezner, Z. & Kalczynski, P. A cover-based competitive location model. J Oper Res Soc 62, 100–113 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.153

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.153

Keywords

Navigation