Skip to main content
Log in

Acting with systems intelligence: integrating complex responsive processes with the systems perspective

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The systems thinking literature assumes that the concept of a system is useful in management and organizational research. Ralph D. Stacey and his collaborators, however, have questioned this. They have presented the theory of complex responsive processes (CRP) as an alternative to systems thinking. We argue that systems thinking and the CRP perspective are complementary. The CRP illuminates many of the micro-behavioural, local interaction and creativity-related organizational phenomena whereas the systems perspective is useful for other purposes. CRP misses the mark in its criticism of systems thinking. The insights of CRP should and could be incorporated, not switched, with the systems perspective. The systems intelligence perspective, proposed by Hämäläinen and Saarinen, provides a framework to accomplish that. By integrating systems thinking and the CRP model we hope to provide a platform from which it is possible to appreciate the relative merits of the two apparently conflicting strands of thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (2006). Why few organizations adopt systems thinking. Syst Res Behav Sci 23: 705–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RL (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Mngt Sci 17: 661–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebe B, Rustin J, Sorter D and Knoblauch S (2003). An expanded view of intersubjectivity in infancy and its application to psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Dialogues 13: 805–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J Opl Res Soc 35: 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner J (1983). The Child's Talk. W.W. Norton & Co: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron K (2008). Positive Leadership: Strategies for Extraordinary Performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Dutton JE and Quinn RE (2003). Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline. Berrett-Koehler Publishers: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s. J Opl Res Soc 36: 757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (2000). Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Syst Res Behav Sci 17: S11–S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1968). The Systems Approach. Delacorte Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1979). The Systems Approach and Its Enemies. Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Este C (1996). Patton: A Genius for War. Harper Perennial: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C, Ackermann F, Bryson JM, Richardson GP, Andersen DF and Finn CB (2009). Integrating modes of policy analysis and strategic management practice: Requisite elements and dilemmas. J Opl Res Soc 60: 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias N (2001). The Society of Individuals. In: Schröter M (ed), Jephcott E (trans.). Continuum International Publishing Group: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery FE and Trist EL (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Hum Relat 18: 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JSBT (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59: 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote JL, Gregor JE, Hepi MC, Baker VE, Houston DJ and Midgley G (2007). Systemic problem structuring applied to community involvement in water conservation. J Opl Res Soc 58: 645–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson BL (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philos T R Soc B: Biol Sci 359: 1367–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French S, Maule J and Papamichail N (2009). Decision Behaviour, Analysis and Support. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner H (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman D (2006). Social Intelligence: The New Science of Social Relationships. Hutchinson: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin D (2002). The Emergence of Leadership: Linking Self-Organization and Ethics. Routledge: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grove AS (1996). Only the Paranoid Survive. Doubleday: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen RP and Saarinen E (2007a). Systems intelligent leadership. In: Hämäläinen RP and Saarinen E (eds). Systems Intelligence in Leadership and Everyday Life. Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology: Espoo.

  • Hämäläinen RP and Saarinen E (2007b). The way forward with systems intelligence. In: Hämäläinen RP and Saarinen E (eds). Systems Intelligence in Leadership and Everyday Life. Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology: Espoo.

  • Hämäläinen RP and Saarinen E (2008a). Systems intelligence—the way forward? A note on Ackoff's ‘Why few organizations adopt systems thinking'. Syst Res Behav Sci 25: 821–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen RP and Saarinen E (2008b). Why systems intelligence? In: Hämäläinen RP and Saarinen E (eds). Systems Intelligence: A New Lens on Human Engagement and Action. Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology: Espoo.

  • Jackson MC (2000). Systems Approaches to Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2006). Creative holism: A critical systems approach to complex problem situations. Syst Res Behav Sci 23: 647–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2009). Fifty years of systems thinking for management. J Opl Res Soc 60: S24–S32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC and Keys P (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. J Opl Res Soc 35: 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma J, Hämäläinen RP and Saarinen E (2008). Perspectives on team dynamics: Meta learning and systems intelligence. Sys Res Behav Sci 25: 757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer JD, Salovey P and Caruso DR (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? Am Psychol 63: 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead GH (1934/1962). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Edited and with an Introduction by Charles W. Morris. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (2000). Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Brocklesby J (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. OMEGA—Int J Mngt Sci 25: 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U, Boodoo G, Bouchard TJ, Boykin AW, Brody N, Ceci SJ, Halpern DF, Loehlin JC, Perloff R, Sternberg RJ and Urbina S (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. Am Psychol 51: 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod RJ (1997). The design of organisational intervention: Choosing the approach. OMEGA—Int J Mngt Sci 25: 415–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod RJ (2008). The transformation competence perspective. J Opl Res Soc 59: 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravindran A, Phillips DT and Solberg JJ (1976). Operations Research: Principles and Practice. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P and Bradbury H (eds). (2001). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage Publications Ltd: London.

  • Saarinen E (2008). Philosophy for managers: Reflections of a practitioner. Philos Mngt 7: S1–S24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen E and Hämäläinen RP (2004). Systems Intelligence: Connecting engineering thinking with human sensitivity. In: Hämäläinen RP and Saarinen E (eds). Systems Intelligence: Discovering a Hidden Competence in Human Action and Organizational Life. Systems Analysis Laboratory Research Reports, Helsinki University of Technology: Espoo.

  • Seligman J (2005). Building a systems thinking culture at Ford Motor Company. Reflections: SoL J 6: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1990/2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday: New York.

  • Senge P, Kleiner A and Roberts C (1994). The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization. Nicholas Brealey Publishing: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P, Kleiner A and Roberts C (1999). The Dance of Change: The Challenges to Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations. Doubleday: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey RD (2001). Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey RD (2003a). Learning as an activity of interdependent people. Learn Org 10: 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey RD (2003b). Complexity and Group Processes: A Radically Social Understanding of Individuals. Brunner-Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey RD (2005). Organizational identity: The paradox of continuity and potential transformation at the same time. Group Anal 38: 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey RD (2006). Complex responsive processes as a theory of organizational improvisation. In: Shaw P and Stacey RD (eds). Experiencing Risk, Spontaneity and Improvisation in Organizational Change: Working Live. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey RD (2007a). Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity to Ways of Thinking About Organisations. Prentice Hall: Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey RD (2007b). The challenge of human interdependence. Eur Bus Rev 19: 292–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey RD, Griffin D and Shaw P (2000). Complexity and Management: Fad Or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2002). All models are wrong: Reflections on becoming a systems scientist. Sys Dynam Rev 18: 501–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1994). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Winterfeldt D and Fasolo B (2009). Structuring decision problems: A case study and reflections for practitioners. Eur J Opl Res 199: 857–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z (2007). Complexity science, systems thinking and pragmatic sensibility. Syst Res Behav Sci 24: 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luoma, J., Hämäläinen, R. & Saarinen, E. Acting with systems intelligence: integrating complex responsive processes with the systems perspective. J Oper Res Soc 62, 3–11 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.175

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.175

Keywords

Navigation