Skip to main content
Log in

A DEA approach to derive individual lower and upper bounds for the technical and allocative components of the overall profit efficiency

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a slack-based data envelopment analysis approach to be used in economic efficiency analyses when the objective is profit maximization. The focus is on the measurement of the technical component of the overall efficiency with the purpose of guaranteeing the achievement of the Pareto efficiency. As a result, we will be able to estimate correctly the allocative component in the sense that this latter only reflects the improvements that can be accomplished by reallocations along the Pareto-efficient frontier. Some new measures of technical and allocative efficiency in terms of both profit ratios and differences of profits are defined. We do not make any assumption on the way the technical efficiency is to be measured, that is, we do not use, for example, either a hyperbolic measure or a directional distance function, which allows us to extend this approach and derive individual lower and upper bounds for these efficiency components. To do it, we use novel models of minimum distance to the frontier. This broadens the range of possibilities for the explanation of the overall efficiency in terms of technical and allocative inefficiencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aparicio J, Ruiz JL and Sirvent I (2007). Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. J Produc Anal 28: 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmild M, Paradi JC, Reese DN and Tam F (2007). Measuring overall efficiency and effectiveness using DEA. Eur J Opl Res 178: 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Opl Res 17: 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD and Maindiratta A (1988). Nonparametric analysis of technical and allocative efficiencies in production. Econometrica 56 (6): 1315–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A and Cooper WW (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Mngt Sci 30: 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft P, Färe R and Obel B (2006). Allocative efficiency of technically inefficient production units. Eur J Opl Res 168: 450–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec W (1997). A graph-type extension of Farrell technical efficiency measure. J Produc Anal 8: 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Chung Y and Färe R (1998). Profit, directional distance functions and Nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theory Appl 98 (2): 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes E (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Opl Res 2 (6): 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW and Thrall RM (1991). A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. J Produc Anal 2: 197–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavas JP and Cox T (1999). A generalized distance function and the analysis of production efficiency. Southern Econ J 66 (2): 294–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Park KS and Pastor JT (1999). RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. J Produc Anal 11 (1): 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM and Tone K (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. 2nd edn, Springer Science & Business Publishers: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R and Grosskopf S (2000). Theory and application of directional distance functions. J Produc Anal 13 (2): 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S and Lovell CAK (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing: Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S and Lovell CAK (1994). Production Frontiers. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S and Weber W (2004). The effect of risk-based capital requirements on profit efficiency in banking. Appl Econ 36 (15): 1731–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc Series A 120: 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela MCAS and Thanassoulis E (2005). Profitability of a sample of Portuguese bank branches and its decomposition into technical and allocative components. Eur J Opl Res 162 (3): 850–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela MCAS and Thanassoulis E (2007). Developing a decomposable measure of profit efficiency using DEA. J Opl Res Soc 58: 481–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela MCAS, Borges P and Thanassoulis E (2003). Finding closest targets in non-oriented DEA models: The case of convex and non-convex technologies. J Produc Anal 19 (2/3): 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MTM2009–10479) for its financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J L Ruiz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruiz, J., Sirvent, I. A DEA approach to derive individual lower and upper bounds for the technical and allocative components of the overall profit efficiency. J Oper Res Soc 62, 1907–1916 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.140

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.140

Keywords

Navigation