Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating quantitative and qualitative forecasting approaches: organizational learning in an action research case

  • Case-Oriented Papers
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This article examines the integration of quantitative and judgmental forecasting, focusing on the implementation process and its impacts on the organization. To this end, the study is based on an action research case study in the cement industry. Empirical evidence highlights the critical change management issues that need to be dealt with to implement an integrated forecasting system. The implementation phase needs to be carried out carefully to gain acceptance within the organization and to provide the best results. In addition, the forecasting process and organization need to be aligned to allow a two-way flow of information from the periphery to the centre and vice versa to allow the integration of the two approaches. In this way, not only can forecasting accuracy be improved, but better knowledge and consensus within the organization can also be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong JS (1985). Long-Range Forecasting: From Crystal Ball to Computer. John Wiley and Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong JS (ed) (2001). Principles of Forecasting. Kluwer Academic: Norwell, MA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg RC and Hoch SJ (1990). Database models and managerial intuition: 50% model +50% manager. Manage Sci 36: 887–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn D (1987). Expert use of forecasts: bootstrapping and linear models. In: Wright G and Ayton P (eds). Judgmental Forecasting. John Wiley: Chichester, pp 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniato F, Kalchschmidt M, Ronchi S, Verganti R and Zotteri G (2002). Forecasting demand fluctuations due to promotional activities: A case in the fresh food industry. In: Beckman S and Sinha KK (eds). POM High Tech, Proceedings of POMS Conference. POMS: San Francisco, CA, pp 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniato F, Kalchschmidt M, Ronchi S, Verganti R and Zotteri G (2005). Clustering customers to forecast demand. Prod Plan Control 16 (1): 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemen RT (1989). Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. Int J Forecasting 5: 559–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collopy F and Armstrong JS (1992). Expert opinions about extrapolation and the mystery of the overlooked discontinuities. Int J Forecasting 8: 575–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan P and Coghlan D (2002). Action research for operations management. Int J Oper Prod Man 22 : 220–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple DJ (1987). Sales forecasting practices: Results from a United States survey. Int J Forecasting 3 : 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos A and Mathews BP (1989). Factors affecting the nature and effectiveness of subjective revision in sales forecasting: An empirical study. Managerial Dec Econ 10: 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donihue MR (1993). Evaluating the role judgment plays in forecast accuracy. J Forecasting 12: 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fildes R, Randall A and Stubbs P (1997). One day ahead demand forecasting in the utility industries: Two case studies. J Opl Res Soc 48: 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fildes R, Nikolopoulos KN, Crone SC and Syntetos AS (2008). Forecasting and operational research: A review. J Opl Res Soc 59 : 1150–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fildes R, Goodwin P, Lawrence M and Nikolopoulos K (2009). Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: An empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning. Int J Forecasting 25: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer I and Harvey N (1999). Combining forecasts: What information do judges need to outperform the simple average? Int J Forecasting 15: 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin P (2000). Correct or combine? Mechanically integrating judgmental forecasts with statistical methods. Int J Forecasting 16: 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin P and Fildes R (1999). Judgmental forecasts of time series affected by special events: Does providing a statistical forecast improve accuracy? J Behav Decis Making 12: 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin P, Fildes R, Lawrence M and Nikolopoulos K (2007). The process of using a forecasting support system. Int J Forecasting 23: 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood D and Levin M (1998). Introduction to Action Research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen JV and Nelson RD (2003). Forecasting and recombining time-series components by using neural networks. J Opl Res Soc 54: 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey N (1995). Why are judgments less consistent in less predictable task situations? Org Behav Human Dec Proc 63: 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey N and Bolger F (1996). Graphs versus tables: Effects of data presentation format on judgmental forecasting. Int J Forecasting 12: 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston FR, Boylan JE, Shale E and Meadows M (1999). A robust forecasting system, based on the combination of two simple moving averages. J Opl Res Soc 50: 1199–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltoft R, Boer H, Caniato F, Gertsen F, Middel R and Nielsen J (2007). Implementing collaborative improvement — top-down, bottom-up or both? Int J Tech Man 37 : 306–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen RD and Flores BE (2001). Forecasting practices of Canadian firms: Survey results and comparisons. Int J Product Econ 70: 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence M, Edmundson RH and O'Connor MJ (1985). An examination of the accuracy of judgmental extrapolation of time series. Int J Forecasting 1: 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence M, Goodwin P, O'Connor M and Önkal D (2006). Judgemental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25 years. Int J Forecasting 22: 493–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WY, Goodwin P, Fildes R, Nikolopoulos K and Lawrence M (2007). Providing support for the use of analogies in demand forecasting tasks. Int J Forecasting 23: 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1958). Group decision and social change. In: Maccoby EE, Newcomb TM, Hartley EL (eds). Readings in Social Psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York, pp 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim JS and O'Connor MJ (1996a). Judgmental forecasting with interactive forecasting support systems. Dec Supp Sys 16: 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim JS and O'Connor MJ (1996b). Judgmental forecasting with time series and causal information. Int J Forecasting 12: 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maines LA (1996). An experimental examination of subjective forecast combination. Int J Forecasting 12: 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S, Wheelwright SC and Hyndman RJ (1998). Forecasting: Methods and Applications. John Wiley and Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews BP and Diamantopoulos A (1986). Managerial intervention in forecasting: An empirical investigation of forecast manipulation. Int J Res Marketing 3: 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews BP and Diamantopoulos A (1989). Judgmental revision of sales forecasts: A longitudinal extension. J Forecasting 8: 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews BP and Diamantopoulos A (1990). Judgmental revision of sales forecasts: Effectiveness of forecast selection. J Forecasting 9: 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews BP and Diamantopoulos A (1992). Judgmental revision of sales forecasts: The relative performance of judgementally revised versus non-revised forecasts. J Forecasting 11: 569–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews BP and Diamantopoulos A (1994). Towards a taxonomy of forecast error measures: A factor-comparative investigation of forecast error dimensions. J Forecasting 13: 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy TM, Davis DF, Golicic SL and Mentzer JT (2006). The evolution of sales forecasting management: A 20 year longitudinal study of forecasting practices. J Forecasting 24: 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNees SK (1990). The role of judgment in macroeconomic forecasting accuracy. Int J Forecasting 6: 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostaghimi M (1996). Combining ranked mean value forecasts. Eur J Oper Res 94: 505–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor M, Remus W and Griggs K (1993). Judgmental forecasting in times of change. Int J Forecasting 9: 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor M, Remus W and Griggs K (2000). Does updating judgmental forecasts improve forecast accuracy? Int J Forecasting 16: 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Önkal D (2009). Comments on ‘Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: An empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning’. Int J Forecasting 25: 30–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport RN (1970). Three dilemmas in action research: With special reference to the Tavistock experience. Human Relations 23 : 499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb DJ and Silver EA (2002). Using composite moving averages to forecast sales. J Opl Res Soc 53: 1281–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronchi S (2006). Managing sub-contractors and suppliers in the construction industry. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal 7 (1): 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders NR and Manrodt KB (1994). Forecasting practices in US corporations: Survey results. Interfaces 24 (2): 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders NR and Ritzman LP (1991). On knowing when to switch from quantitative to judgmental forecasts. Int J Oper Prod Man 11 (6): 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders NR and Ritzman LP (1992). The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting. J Behav Dec Making 5: 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders NR and Ritzman LP (2001). Judgmental adjustment of statistical forecasts. In: Armstrong JS (ed). Principles of Forecasting. Kluwer Academic: Norwell, MA, pp 405–416.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shani AB and Pasmore WA (1985). Organization enquiry: Towards a new model of the action research process. In: Warwick DD (ed). Contemporary Organization Development: Current Thinking and Applications. Scott Foresman: Glenview, IL, pp 438–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart TR (2001). Improving reliability of judgmental forecasts. In: Armstrong JS (ed). Principles of Forecasting. Kluwer Academic: Norwell, MA, pp 81–106.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Susman GI and Evered RD (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Admin Sci Quart 23 : 582–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syntetos AA, Nikolopoulos K, Boylan JE, Fildes R and Goodwin P (2009). The effects of integrating management judgement into intermittent demand forecasts. Int J Prod Econ 118 : 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trist E and Murray H (1993). The Social Engagement of Social Science. A Tavistock Anthology. Volume II, The Socio-Technical Perspective. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner DS (1990). The role of judgment in macroeconomic forecasting. J Forecasting 9: 315–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte WF (1991). Social Theory for Action: How Individuals and Organizations Learn to Change. Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe C and Flores B (1990). Judgmental adjustment of earnings forecasts. J Forecasting 9: 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy

    F Caniato & S Ronchi

  2. Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Dalmine, Italy

    M Kalchschmidt

Authors
  1. F Caniato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Kalchschmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S Ronchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Kalchschmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caniato, F., Kalchschmidt, M. & Ronchi, S. Integrating quantitative and qualitative forecasting approaches: organizational learning in an action research case. J Oper Res Soc 62, 413–424 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.142

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.142

Keywords

Search

Navigation