Abstract
Supply chain inventories are prone to fluctuations and instability. Known as the bullwhip effect, small variations in the end item demand create oscillations that amplify throughout the chain. By using system dynamics simulation, we investigate some of the structural sources of the bullwhip effect, and explore the effectiveness of information sharing to eliminate the undesirable fluctuations. Extensive simulation analysis is carried out on parameters of some standard ordering policies, as well as external demand and lead-time parameters. Simulation results show that (i) a major structural cause of the bullwhip effect is isolated demand forecasting performed at each echelon of the supply chain, and (ii) demand and forecast sharing strategies can significantly reduce the bullwhip effect, even though they cannot completely eliminate it. We specifically show how each policy is improved by demand and forecast sharing. Future research involves more advanced ordering and forecasting methods, modelling of other well-known sources of bullwhip, and more complex supply network structures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barlas Y (2002). System dynamics: Systemic feedback modeling for policy analysis. In: Knowledge for Sustainable Development—An Insight into the Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. UNESCO-EOLSS Publishers: Paris, France, Oxford, UK, pp 1131–1175.
Barlas Y and Özevin MG (2004). Analysis of stock management gaming experiments and alternative ordering formulations. Syst Res Behav Sci 21: 439–470.
Chen F, Drezner Z, Ryan JK and Simchi-Levi D (1998). The bullwhip effect: Managerial insights on the impact of forecasting and information on variability in a supply chain. In: Tayur S, Ganeshan R and Magazine M (eds). Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, pp 417–440.
Chen F, Ryan JK and Simchi-Levi D (2000). The impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect. Nav Res Log 47: 269–286.
Cheng TCE and Wu YN (2005). The impact of information sharing in a two-level supply chain with multiple retailers. J Opl Res Soc 56: 1159–1165.
Croson R and Donohue K (2005). Upstream versus downstream information and its impact on the bullwhip effect. Syst Dynam Rev 21: 249–260.
Datta S, Granger CWJ, Barari M and Gibbs T (2007). Management of supply chain: An alternative modelling technique for forecasting. J Opl Res Soc 58: 1459–1469.
Dejonckheere J, Disney SM, Lambrecht MR and Towill DR (2002). Transfer function analysis of forecasting induced bullwhip in supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 78: 133–144.
Dejonckheere J, Disney SM, Lambrecht MR and Towill DR (2004). The impact of information enrichment on the bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective. Eur J Opl Res 153: 727–750.
Disney SM and Towill DR (2003). The effect of vendor managed inventory (VMI) dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 85: 199–215.
Disney SM, Naim MM and Potter A (2004). Assessing the impact of e-business on supply chain dynamics. Int J Prod Econ 89: 109–118.
Forrester JW (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Pegasus Communications: Waltham, Mass.
Gallego G and Özer Ö (2001). Optimal use of demand information in supply chain management. In: Song J and Yao DD (eds). Supply Chain Structures: Coordination, Information and Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, pp 127–168.
Gavirneni S, Kapuscinski R and Tayur S (1999). Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Manage Sci 45: 16–24.
Gündüz AB (2003). Strategies to reduce fluctuations in supply chains: A dynamic modeling approach. MS Thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering, Bogazici University.
Holweg M, Disney SM, Holmstrom J and Smaros J (2005). Supply chain collaboration: Making sense of the strategy continuum. Eur Manage J 23: 170–181.
Jeong S and Maday CJ (1996). Dynamic information control for multi-echelon production-distribution systems with constrained production capacity. Syst Dynam Rev 12: 331–343.
Lee HL, Padmanabhan P and Whang S (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Manage Sci 43: 546–558.
Lee HL and Whang S (1998). Information sharing in a supply chain. Research Paper, Stanford University Graduate School of Business.
Nahmias S (2009). Production and Operations Analysis. McGraw-Hill: New York.
Potter A and Disney SM (2006). Bullwhip and batching: An exploration. Int J Prod Econ 104: 408–418.
Silver EA, Pyke DF and Peterson R (1998). Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling. 3rd edn, John Wiley & Sons: New York.
Sterman JD (1989). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision experiment. Manage Sci 35: 321–339.
Sterman JD (2000). Business Dynamics. McGraw-Hill: Boston.
Xu K, Dong Y and Evers PT (2001). Towards better coordination of the supply chain. Transport Res E 37: 35–54.
Yaşarcan H and Barlas Y (2005). A generalized stock control formulation for stock management problems involving composite delays and secondary stocks. Syst Dynam Rev 21: 33–68.
Acknowledgements
Supported by Bogazici University Research Fund no. 02R102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barlas, Y., Gunduz, B. Demand forecasting and sharing strategies to reduce fluctuations and the bullwhip effect in supply chains. J Oper Res Soc 62, 458–473 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.188
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.188