Skip to main content
Log in

Mixing methodologies and paradigmatic commensurability

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Beer S (1979). The Heart of Enterprise. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organisations. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology? Brit J Sociol 35 (1): 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell G and Morgan G (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Heinemann: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1983). O.R. and the systems movement: Mappings and conflicts. J Opl Res Soc 34: 661–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Holwell S (2004). ‘Classic’ OR and ‘soft’ OR—An asymmetric complementarity. In: Pidd M (ed). Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbert ML (1990). Discussion on methodology. In: Guba EG (ed). The Paradigm Dialog. Sage: Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R (1988). Cybernetic methodology to study and design human activities. PhD thesis, Aston University, Birmingham.

  • Espejo R (1990). Complexity and change: Reflections upon the cybernetic intervention in Chile, 1970–1973. Syst Practice 3: 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R (1992). Management of complexity in problem solving. T I Meas Control 14 (1): 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL and Jackson MC (1991). Total systems intervention: A practical face to critical systems thinking. Syst Practice 4: 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia D and Pitre E (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review 15: 584–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In: Guba EG (ed). The Paradigm Dialog. Sage: Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson B (2008). Whither qualitative/quantitative?: Grounds for methodological convergence. Qual Quant 42: 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1987). Present positions and future prospects in management science. Omega 15: 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2003a). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2003b). The power of multi-methodology: Some thoughts for John Mingers. J Opl Res Soc 541: 1300–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2009). Managing the tensions created by mixing methods: Comments for Eden et al from a critical systems perspective. J Opl Res Soc 60: 1297–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC and Keys P (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. J Opl Res Soc 35: 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson N and Carter P (1991). In defence of paradigm incommensurability. Organ Stud 12 (1): 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiadis K and Mingers J (2006). Combining PSMs with hard OR methods: The philosophical and practical challenges. J Opl Res Soc 57: 856–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1989b). Critical systems: The theory and practice of partitioning methodologies. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, Vol. II, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2–7 July.

  • Midgley G (1992). Pluralism and the legitimation of systems science. Syst Practice 5: 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1993). A reply to Haridimos Tsoukas, the radical critic of radical critique. Syst Practice 6: 2301–2309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2003). A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science methods. J Opl Res Soc 54: 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2006). A critique of statistical modelling in management science from a critical realist perspective: Its role within multimethodology. J Opl Res Soc 57: 202–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Brocklesby J (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega 25: 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses JW and Knutsen TL (2007). Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidd M (2004). Bringing it all together. In: Pidd M (ed). Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (1993). The road to emancipation is through organisational development: A critical evaluation of total systems intervention. Syst Practice 6 (1): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harwood, S. Mixing methodologies and paradigmatic commensurability. J Oper Res Soc 62, 806–809 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.152

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.152

Navigation