Skip to main content
Log in

Group inquiry to aid organisational learning in enterprises

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This paper describes a method for surfacing and exploring ‘situated knowledge’ in medium-sized organisations, with employee groups utilising a ‘low impact’ form of group support system (GSS), based on wireless handsets. Some results of piloting this method are summarised and one intervention is presented in detail. The method encouraged organisational members to give voice to the emotions and politics of leadership and learning in organisations, and helped to articulate how situated knowledge was ignored, as well as utilised. The method is practical, and may be used by organisations for themselves to aid the development of group as well as individual reflection, to stimulate the consideration of change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi M and Leidner D (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart 25 (1): 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou E and Gabriel Y (2002). Emotion, learning and organisational change: towards an integration of psychoanalytic and other perspectives. J Organ change Manage 14 (5): 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks D (2006). Audience Response Systems in Higher Education. Idea Group Publishing: Hershey.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet A and Tomblin MS (2006). A learning network framework for modern organisations. J Inform Knowl Manage Syst 36 (3): 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coopey J (1995). The learning organisation, power, politics and ideology introduction. Manage Learn 26 (2): 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coopey J and Burgoyne J (2000). Politics and learning. In: Easterby-Smith M, Araujo L and Burgoyne J (eds). Organisational Learning: 3rd International Conference. Vol. 1. Lancaster University: Lancaster, pp 275–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutu D (2002). The Anxiety of Learning: The HBR Interview with Edgar Schein. Harvard Business Review 80 (3): 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon NM (1999). The Organisational Learning Cycle, How We Can Learn Collectively. Gower: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Ackermann F (1996). ‘Horses for courses’: A stakeholder approach to the evaluation of GDSSs. Group Decis Negot 5: 501–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer B (1999). In search of a social learning theory. In: Easterby-Smith M, Burgoyne J and Araujo L (eds). Organizational Learning and the Learning Organisation. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer B (2003). Social learning theory: Learning as participation in social processes. In: Easterby-Smith M and Lyles M (eds). The Blackwell Handbook of Organisational Learning and Knowledge Management. Blackwell Publishers: Malden, MA and Oxford, UK, pp 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman S (2003). Understanding Emotion at Work. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay PN (1998). On evaluating the performance of GSS: Furthering the debate. Eur J Opl Res 107: 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad J (2004). An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decis Support Syst 37 (2): 230–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad J and Hiltz S (1999). An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. J Manage Inform Syst 15: 7–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad J and Hiltz SR (2001). Group support systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. J Manage Inform Syst 17 (3): 115–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1979). Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. Penguin: Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gear AE and Read MJ (1993). On-line group process support. Omega 21: 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi S (2003). Knowing as desiring: Mythical knowledge and the knowledge journey in communities of practitioners. Paper presented to the fifth international conference on ‘Organisational Learning and Knowledge’, Lancaster University, May/June.

  • Gherardi S and Nicolini D (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance? J Manage Studies 39: 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves S, Gear A and Read M (2006). Learning and anxiety: Exploring individual judgement processes in a learning environment with a group support system. In: Banks D (ed). Audience Response Systems. Idea Group Publishing: Hershey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardless C, Lindgren R and Schultze U (2007). Technology-mediated learning systems for project work. Scand J Inform Syst 19 (2): 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan H and Crawford K (2007). Knowledge mobilization in communities through socio-technical systems. Knowl Manage Res Pract 5: 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins D (2009). Engaging the small firm in learning: practice based theorizing on complex social knowledge. J Eur Ind Train 33 (1): 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman D, Pavlica K and Thorpe R (1996). Rethinking Kolb's theory of experiential learning: The contribution of social construction and activity theory. Manage Learn 4 (24): 485–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen PJ and Kolb DA (2002). Conversation as communion: Spiritual, feminist, moral and natural perspectives. In: Baker AC, Jensen PJ and Kolb DA (eds). Conversational Learning An Experiential approach to Knowledge Creation. Chapter 2, Quorum Books: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones C, Connolly M, Gear A and Read M (2006). Collaborative learning with group interactive technology: A case study with postgraduate students. Manage Learn 37 (3): 1350–5076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein E (2002). Anonymity in group support systems: Philosophical and ethical issues. Proceedings of International Conference: Managing Information Technology in a Global Environment, Idea Group Publishing, held in Toronto.

  • Lave J and Wenger E (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. University of Cambridge Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C, Liu A, Hsu M and Wu J (2007). Pursuing excellence in firm core knowledge through intelligent group decision support system. Ind Manage Data Syst 108 (3): 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz R and Popper M (2000). Organisational learning in a hospital. J Appl Behav Sci 36 (3): 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1996). Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning. In: Cohen MD and Sproull LS (eds). Organisational Learning. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici S and Doise W (1994). Conflict and Consensus: A General Theory of Collective Decisions. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker JF Jr., Briggs RO, Mittleman DD, Vogel DR and Balthazard PA (1997). Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings. J Manage Inform Syst 13 (3): 163–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervan GP (1998). A review of research in group support systems: Leaders, approaches and directions. Decis Support Syst 23: 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read M and Gear T (2007). Developing professional judgement with the aid of a ‘low profile’ group support system. J Opl Res Soc 58: 1021–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read M, Gear T and Townend D (2000a). Development of an approach to the validation of client assessment models in social services using a group process support system. Public Manage 2 (2): 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read M, Edwards J and Gear A (2000b). Group preference aggregation rules: The results of a comparative analysis with in situ data. J Oper Res Soc 51: 557–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read M, Gear T and Devold R (2004). An experimental introduction of group process support in social services. Eur J Oper Res 156: 456–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin H, Edelman A, Falkensten M and Stewart C (2010). The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and well-being. CyberPsychol Behav Soc Network 13 (3): 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw DC, Eden C and Ackermann D (2002). Evaluating group support systems: Improving brainstorming research methodology. Working Paper Series, University of Strathclyde, Paper No. 2002−2006.

  • Stevens CA and Finlay PN (1996). A research framework for group support systems. Group Decis Negot 5 (4–6): 521–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart J and Kinnie N (2010). Organisational learning, knowledge assets and HR practices in professional service firms. Hum Resource Manage J 20 (1): 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner D, Gear T and Read M (2009). Conversations’ in education, professional judgement and training. Philos Manage 8 (1): 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden K (1996). Scenarios—The Art of Strategic Conversation. John Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince R (2001). Power and emotion in organisational learning. Hum Relat 54 (10): 1325–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince R (2002). Organizing reflection. Manage Learn 33 (1): 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince R (2004). Rethinking Strategic Learning. Routledge: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vince R and Reynolds M (2007). Introduction to Experiential Learning and Management Education: Key Themes and Future Directions. OUP: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince R, Gear AE, Read M and Minkes AL (2003). Group enquiry for collective learning in organisations. J Manage Dev 22: 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White L (2006). Evaluating problem-structuring methods: Developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of PSMs. J Oper Res Soc 57: 842–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M, Goodman PR and Cronin M (2007). Group learning. Acad Manage Rev 32 (4): 1041–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Read.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Read, M., Gear, T. & Vince, R. Group inquiry to aid organisational learning in enterprises. J Oper Res Soc 63, 736–747 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.80

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.80

Keywords

Navigation