Abstract
This paper presents the problem of arrangement of storage racks for non-uniform load units in a storage area space when considering limitations created by the carrying pillars of a warehouse. Three variants of rack section arrangement within the planning grid of carrying pillars are presented. A mathematical formalism of the arrangement within the X, Y, and Z axes is introduced. An exact model for the warehouse building cost minimization and space consumption minimization has been defined. The model has been enriched with numerical examples. Finally, the bi-level approach containing both the mathematical model and the coordinating procedure for the problem solution is presented.
References
Ashayeri J, Gelders LF and Wassenhove L (1985). A microcomputer-based optimization model for the design of automated warehouses. International Journal of Production Research 23 (4): 825–839.
Baker P and Canessa M (2009). Warehouse design: A structured approach. European Journal of Operational Research 193 (2): 425–436.
Bassan Y, Roll Y and Rosenblatt MJ (1980). Internal layout design of a warehouse. AIIE Transactions 12 (4): 317–322.
Bazargan-Lari M (1999). Layout designs in cellular manufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research 112 (2): 258–272.
Caron F, Marchet G and Perego A (2000). Optimal layout in low-level picker-to-part systems. International Journal of Production Research 38 (1): 101–117.
Chan F and Chan HK (2011). Improving the productivity of order picking of a manual-pick and multi-level rack distribution warehouse through the implementation of class-based storage. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (3): 2686–2700.
Drira A, Pierreval H and Hajri-Gabouj S (2007). Facility layout problems: A survey. Annual Reviews in Control 31 (2): 255–267.
Drury J and Falconer P (2003). Buildings for Industrial Storage and Distribution. Architectural Press: Oxford.
Ferran JJ, Torregrosa JB, Ferrer C, Ferrer CM, Redon M and Sanchez FJ (2009). Modular spatial structure applied to a single-story industrial building. International Journal of Space Structure 24 (1): 37–44.
Garey MR and Johnson DS (1979). Computer and Intractability. A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman and Company: New York.
Gu J, Goetschalckx M and McGinnis L F (2010). Research on warehouse design and performance evaluation: A comprehensive review. European Journal of Operational Research 203 (3): 539–549.
Gue KR, Ivanovic G and Meller RD (2012). A unit-load warehouse with multiple pickup and deposit points and non-traditional aisles. Transportation Research Part E 48 (4): 795–806.
Heragu SS (2006). Facilities Design. iUniverse Publishing Company: Lincoln, NE.
Huertas JI, Diaz J and Trigos F (2007). Layout evaluation of large capacity warehouses. Facilities 25 (7/8): 259–270.
Jarvis JM and McDowell ED (1991). Optimal product layout in an order picking warehouse. IIE Transactions 23 (1): 93–102.
Lee HL, Lee MH and Hur LS (2005). Optimal design of rack structure with modular cell in AS/RS. International Journal of Production Economics 98 (2): 172–178.
Lerher T (2006). Design and evaluation of the class-based multi-aisle AS/RS. International Journal of Simulation Modeling 5 (1): 25–36.
Lin LC and Sharp GP (1999). Quantitative and qualitative indices for the plant layout evaluation problem. European Journal of Operational Research 116 (1): 100–117.
Liu Ch-M (2004). Optimal storage layout and order picking for warehousing. International Journal of Operations Research 1 (1): 37–46.
Matson JD and White JA (1981). Storage system optimization. Working paper 81-09, Production and Distribution Research Centre: Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.
McKnight D (1999). A practical guide to evaluating the functional utility of warehouses. The Appraisal Journal 67 (1): 29–37.
Mulcahy DE (1994). Warehouse Distribution and Operations Handbook. McGraw-Hill: New York.
NAVSUP Publication 529 (1985). Warehouse Modernization and Layout Planning Guide. SCG for the Department of the U.S. Navy. Naval Publication and Forms Center: Philadelphia, PA.
Nishi T and Konishi M (2010). An optimisation model and its effective beam search heuristics for floor-storage warehousing systems. International Journal of Production Research 48 (7): 1947–1966.
Onut S, Tuzkaya UR and Dogac B (2008). A particle swarm optimization algorithm for the multiple-level warehouse layout design problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering 54 (4): 783–799.
Park YH and Webster DB (1989). Design of class-based storage racks for minimizing travel time in a three-dimensional storage system. International Journal of Production Research 27 (9): 1589–1601.
Roberts SD and Reed R (1972). Optimal warehouse bay configurations. AIIE Transactions 4 (3): 178–185.
Roodbergen KJ and Vis IFA (2006). A model for warehouse layout. IIE Transactions 38 (10): 799–811.
Rosenblatt MJ and Roll Y (1984). Warehouse design with storage policy considerations. International Journal of Production Research 22 (5): 809–821.
Tompkins JA and Smith JD (1998). The Warehouse Management Handbook. Tompkins Press: Raleigh, NC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
One of the most important issues occurring while arranging storage racks consisting of identical rack cells is determining the number of work aisles. In particular, one must decide which configuration of racking system is better according to the criterion of space utilization: the one with even (Figure A1(b)) or odd (Figure A1(a)) number of rack rows. For this purpose it is necessary to present schemes of these two options (Figure A1) and to make assumptions reflecting some technological requirements.
-
Assumption A: the dimensions of rack cells are x and y. Width of the working aisle is Ast.
-
Assumption B: let n be the number of rack cells to be arranged.
-
Assumption C: for each n, x, y, Ast, the following expressions are true:
-
°x, y, Ast> 0; x < y; n> 1;
-
°Ast> 2x this assumption reflects the relation between the width of rack rows and the width of work aisles for most types of forklifts used in conventional warehouses;
-
°x, y, Ast—real numbers;
-
°n—integer.
-
-
Assumption D: width of an aisle between rack rows in a double rack row (equivalent to Ast 2,3 on Figure 5) is 0.
-
Assumption E: storage is in one layer.
Theorem
-
With the assumptions A, B, C, D, and E for the fixed number of rack cells, and when using a uniform work aisle width, designing a storage area with an even number of rack rows (Figure A1(b)) consumes less area than designing with an odd number (Figure A1(a)).
Proof
-
To prove the Theorem, it is sufficient to show that for any n, x, y, Ast, the following inequality is satisfied:
The rearranged inequality takes the form:
where
which is true for any Ast> 0.
Assuming that n is even, inequality (23) will be:
hence,
which is true for any Ast> 0.
Assuming that n is odd, inequality (23) will be:
hence,
Because assumption C restricts n> 1 and Ast> 2x, inequality (28) is always true. □
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ratkiewicz, A. A combined bi-level approach for the spatial design of rack storage area. J Oper Res Soc 64, 1157–1168 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.39
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.39