Skip to main content
Log in

Outpatient appointment scheduling in presence of seasonal walk-ins

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This study investigates appointment systems (AS), as combinations of access rules and appointment-scheduling rules, explicitly designed for dealing with walk-in seasonality. In terms of ‘access rules’, strategies are tested for adjusting capacity through intra-week, or monthly seasonality of walk-ins, or their combined effects. In terms of ‘appointment rules’, strategies are tested to determine which particular slots to double-book or leave open in cases where seasonal walk-in rates exceed or fall short of the overall yearly rate. In that regard, this study integrates capacity and appointment decisions, which are usually addressed in an isolated manner in previous studies. Simulation optimization is used to derive heuristic solutions to the appointment-scheduling problem, and the findings are compared in terms of in-clinic measures of patient wait time, physician idle time and overtime. The goal is to provide practical guidelines for healthcare practitioners on how to best design their AS when seasonal walk-ins exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

References

  • Ashton R, Hsgue L, Brandreth M, Worthington D and Cropper S (2005). A simulation-based study of a NHS walk-in centre. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56 (2): 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey N (1952). A study of queues and appointment systems in hospital outpatient departments with special reference to waiting times. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 14 (2): 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayirli T and Veral E (2003). Outpatient scheduling in health care: A review of literature. Production and Operations Management 12 (4): 519–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayirli T, Veral E and Rosen H (2006). Designing appointment scheduling systems for ambulatory care services. Health Care Management Science 9 (1): 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayirli T, Veral E and Rosen H (2008). Assessment of patient classification in appointment system design. Production and Operations Management 17 (3): 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayirli T, Yang KK and Quek SA (2012). A universal appointment rule in the presence of no-shows and walk-ins. Production and Operations Management 21 (4): 682–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton B and Gupta D (2003). A sequential bounding approach for optimal appointment scheduling. IIE Transactions 35 (11): 1003–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson G, Hasija S and Pinker E (2011). Reserving capacity for urgent patients in primary care. Production and Operations Management. 20 (3): 456–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forjuoh SN, Averitt WM, Cauthen DB, Couchman GR, Symm B and Mitchell M (2001). Open-access appointment scheduling in family practice: Comparison of prediction grid with actual appointments. Journal of American Board of Family Practice (JABFP) 14 (4): 259–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu MC (2002). Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice. Informs Journal on Computing 14 (3): 192–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green L and Savin S (2009). Reducing delays for medical appointments: A queueing approach. Operations Research 56 (6): 1526–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green LV, Savin S and Murray M (2007). Providing timely access to care: What is the right panel size? The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 33 (4): 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta D and Denton B (2008). Appointment scheduling in health care: Challenges and opportunities. IIE Transactions 40 (9): 800–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta D and Wang L (2008). Revenue management for a primary-care clinic in the presence of patient choice. Operations Research 56 (3): 576–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta D and Wang WY (2012). Patient appointments in ambulatory care, Chapter 4 in handbook of healthcare system scheduling. In: Randolph WH (ed.) International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. Vol. 168. Springer: New York, pp 65–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herriott S (1999). Reducing delays and waiting times with open-access scheduling. Family Practice Management 6 (4): 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho C and Lau H (1992). Minimizing total cost in scheduling outpatient appointments. Management Science 38 (12): 1750–1764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaandorp GC and Koole G (2007). Optimal outpatient appointment scheduling. Health Care Management Science 10 (3): 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S and Giachetti RE (2006). A stochastic mathematical appointment overbooking model for healthcare providers to improve profits. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans 36 (6): 1211–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen KJ and Rohleder TR (1996). Scheduling outpatient appointments in a dynamic environment. Journal of Operations Management 14 (2): 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen KJ and Rohleder TR (2004). Outpatient appointment scheduling with urgent clients in a dynamic, multi-period environment. International Journal of Service Industry Management 15 (2): 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen KJ and Yoogalingam R (2009). Improving performance in outpatient appointment services with a simulation optimization approach. Production and Operations Management 18 (4): 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koeleman PM and Koole G (2011). Optimal outpatient appointment scheduling with emergency arrivals and general service times. Working paper, Vrije University, Amsterdam.

  • Kopach R et al (2007). Effects of clinical characteristics on successful open access scheduling. Health Care Management Science 10 (2): 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranenburg J (2009). The prospect of walk-in for the CT department of the AMC. University of Twente MSc Graduation Thesis.

  • LaGanga LR and Lawrence SR (2007a). Clinic overbooking to improve patient access and increase provider productivity. Decision Sciences 38 (2): 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaGanga LR and Lawrence SR (2007b). Appointment scheduling with overbooking to mitigate productivity loss from no-shows. In: Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, November 2007.

  • Law AM and Kelton WD (2000). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zhou Y and Ishino F (2008). Using Simulation to improve outpatient appointment system with minimum change. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Spring Simulation Multiconference.

  • Liu N, Ziya S and Kulkarni VG (2010). Dynamic scheduling of outpatient appointments under patient no-shows and cancellations. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 12 (2): 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLay LA, Foufoulides C and Merrick JRW (2010). Using simulation-optimization to construct screening strategies for cervical cancer. Health Care Management Science 13 (4): 294–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthuraman K and Lawley M (2008). A stochastic overbooking model for outpatient clinical scheduling with no-shows. IIE Transactions 40 (9): 820–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu X, Rardin LR, Williams JAS and Willis DR (2007). Matching daily healthcare provider capacity to demand in advanced access scheduling systems. European Journal of Operational Research 183 (2): 812–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico F, Salari E and Centeno G (2007). Emergency departments nurse allocation to face a pandemic influenza outbreak. In: Henderson SG, Biller B, Hsieh M-H, Shortle J, Tew JD, and Barton RR (eds), Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference. Washington DC, USA, pp 1292–1298.

  • Rising E, Baron R and Averill B (1973). A systems analysis of a university-health-service outpatient clinic. Operations Research 21 (5): 1030–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson LW and Chen RR (2003). Scheduling doctors’ appointments: Optimal and empirically-based heuristic policies. IIE Transactions 35 (3): 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson LW and Chen RR (2010). A comparison of traditional and open-access policies for appointment scheduling. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 12 (2): 330–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohleder TR and Klassen KJ (2002). Rolling horizon appointment scheduling: A simulation study. Health Care Management Science 5 (3): 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohleder TR, Bischak DP and Baskin LB (2007). Modeling patient service centers with simulation and system dynamics. Health Care Management Science 10 (1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin S (2006). Managing patient appointments in primary care. In: Hall Randolp (ed). Patient Flow: Reducing Delay in Healthcare Delivery. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaramoorthi D, Chen VCP, Rosenberger JM, Kim SB and Buckley-Behan DF (2010). A data-integrated simulation-based optimization for assigning nurses to patient admissions. Health Care Management Science 13 (3): 210–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swisher JR, Jacobson SH, Jun JB and Balci O (2001). Modeling and analyzing a physician clinic environment using discrete-event (visual) simulation. Computers & Operations Research 28 (2): 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B (1984). Patient use of mixed appointment systems in an urban practice. British Medical Journal 289 (November): 1277–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekin E and Sabuncuoglu I (2004). Simulation optimization: A comprehensive review on theory and applications. IIE Transactions 36 (11): 1067–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanden Bosch PM and Dietz CD (2000). Minimizing expected waiting in a medical appointment system. IIE Transactions 32 (9): 841–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virji A (1990). A study of patients attending without appointments in an urban general practice. British Medical Journal 301 (6742): 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vissers J (1979). Selecting a suitable appointment system in an outpatient setting. Medical Care 17 (12): 1207–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vissers J and Wijngaard J (1979). The outpatient appointment system: Design of a simulation study. European Journal of Operational Research 3 (6): 459–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WY and Gupta D (2011). Adaptive appointment systems with patient preferences. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 13 (3): 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijewickrama AKA and Takakuwa S (2006). Simulation analysis of an outpatient department of internal medicine in a university hospital. In: Perrone LF, Lawson BG, Liu J and Wieland FP (eds). Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference. Monterey, CA. pp 425-432.

  • Yang KK, Lau ML and Quek SA (1998). A new appointment rule for a single-server, multiple-customer service system. Naval Research Logistics 45 (3): 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng B, Turkcan A, Lin J and Lawley MA (2010). Clinical scheduling models with overbooking for patients with heterogeneous no-show probabilities. Annals of Operations Research 178 (1): 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) grant 109K451. We thank our research assistants Ronay Ak and Pinar Dursun for their valuable contributions in simulation modeling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tugba Cayirli.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table A1

Table A1 SimOpt rules for overbooking (OB) and open slot (OS) positions

Appendix B

Table B1

Table B1 Heuristic rules for overbooking (OB) and open slot (OS) positions

Appendix C

C.1. Sensitivity to trade-offs between waiting costs for scheduled and walk-in patients

We test our results to the sensitivity of the choice of β-parameter, given that some trade-offs may be expected in the waiting times of walk-in and scheduled patients. The analysis is done using the proposed heuristics in Section 5.2 against the benchmark case of No_Adj. In Figure C1, for the ‘high’ environment with probability of walk-ins P=40%, and high levels on monthly, intra-weekly, and intraday seasonality, different β-values (ie, β=1, 2, 5, 10, 15) are used in deriving the efficient frontiers. Note that β=1 corresponds to the efficient frontier derived for the same environment in Figure 6 (Section 5.2).

Figure C1
figure 7

Efficient frontiers for different relative wait costs for walk-ins and scheduled patients (β).

As observed in Figure C1, No_Adj policy becomes one of the best policies beyond β⩾10, replacing Heuristic1 on the efficient frontier when α is 1. In a similar analysis conducted on the other extreme ‘low’ environment with P=20% and low/none levels on all types of seasonality, the shift to No_Adj occurs when α=1 and β⩾20, approximately. Therefore, when the patient's time is highly valuable and when scheduled patient's time is relatively much higher compared with walk-ins, it may be best not to use any seasonal adjustments. For moderate/high cost ratios tested at α=5, 20, best appointment rules remain the same regardless of β-value.

On the one hand, these findings suggest that further details on the cost trade-offs between walk-ins and scheduled patients may be important in determining the best policy, that includes ‘no adjustment’. On the other hand, clinics that accept walk-ins are less likely to value their walk-in patients’ time at such extreme trade-offs (for example, β=10 means a scheduled patient's 5-min wait is equivalent to a walk-in's 50-min wait). For that reason, our conclusions in Sections 5.1 and 5.2 remain valid for most clinics that target smaller β-values with the goal of serving all patients within a fairly reasonable amount of time.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cayirli, T., Gunes, E. Outpatient appointment scheduling in presence of seasonal walk-ins. J Oper Res Soc 65, 512–531 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.56

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.56

Keywords

Navigation