Skip to main content
Log in

No-wait scheduling of position dependent jobs and adjustable processing intervals

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a single machine no-wait scheduling model whereby job processing times are general functions of their position in the job sequence. We assume that the single machine must operate at a certain cycle, which can be determined by the scheduler. Furthermore, exactly one job has to be completed by the end of each cycle. Using different variations of the Linear Assignment Problem formulation, we develop polynomial time algorithms for minimizing the following objectives: makespan, total completion time, maximum earliness and total earliness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biskup D (1999). Single machine scheduling with learning considerations. European Journal of Operational Research 115 (1): 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkard R, Dell’Amico M and Martello S (2012). Assignment Problems. Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Philadelphia.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Che A and Chu C (2009). Multi-degree cyclic scheduling of a no-wait robotic cell with multiple robots. European Journal of Operational Research 199 (1): 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawiejnowicz S (2008). Time-dependent Scheduling. Springer: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall NG and Sriskandarajah CA (1996). A survey of machine scheduling problems with blocking and no-wait in process. Operations Research 44 (3): 510–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karzanov AV and Livshits EM (1978). Minimal quantity of operators for serving a homogeneous linear technological process. Automation and Remote Control 39 (3): 445–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kats V and Levner E (2002). Cyclic scheduling in a robotic production line. Journal of Scheduling 5 (1): 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung J and Levner E (2006). An efficient algorithm for multi-hoist cyclic scheduling with fixed processing times. Operation Research Letters 34 (4): 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosheiov G (2001a). Scheduling problems with learning effect. European Journal of Operational Research 132 (3): 687–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosheiov G (2001b). Parallel machine scheduling with learning effect. Journal of the Operational Research Society 52 (10): 1165–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosheiov G and Sidney JB (2003). Note on scheduling with general learning curves to minimize the number of tardy jobs. European Journal of Operational Research 147 (3): 665–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosheiov G and Sidney JB (2005). A note on scheduling with learning effect to minimize the number of tardy jobs. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56 (1): 110–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabtay D, Arviv K, Stern H and Eday Y (2014). A combined robot selection and scheduling problem for flow-shops with no wait restrictions. Omega 43: 96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright TP (1936). Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 3 (4): 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the Associate Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback and helpful suggestions. The author would also like to thank Clara Coifman and Benjamin Ostroviecki for the insightful conversations on the model studied in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oron, D. No-wait scheduling of position dependent jobs and adjustable processing intervals. J Oper Res Soc 66, 732–736 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.54

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.54

Keywords

Navigation