General Paper
Journal of the Operational Research Society advance online publication 4 March 2009; doi: 10.1057/jors.2008.188
Synthesis as conception shifting
- 1Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
- 2University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Correspondence: L Houghton, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, Queensland 4053, Australia. E-mail: l.houghton@griffith.edu.au
Received August 2008; Accepted November 2008; Published online 4 March 2009.
Abstract
John Dewey's work inspired Simon, Churchman and Ackoff. To encourage rigorous thinking, Dewey makes the rallying cry: Synthesize don't just analyse. Operational research does analysis well. However, our understanding of its conjoint twin, synthesis, may need some more pragmatic rationalization. Synthesis, often confused with systems thinking, is thought to be a process of engagement with alternative conceptions (interpretations) of the problem domain; conceptions that suggest a different solution set. Therefore, this paper explores the proposition that operational research needs to engage more synthesis to complement its skill at analysis. Why synthesis is required, what it is and how it works is explained. Two case studies are provided to demonstrate the mechanisms of synthesis as one part of strategic thinking.
Keywords:
synthesis, systems thinking, shifting concepts, case studies


