Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling lost demand in competitive facility location

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a simple new approach to model lost demand (also referred to as elastic demand) in competitive facility location. A ‘dummy’ competing facility that attracts the lost demand is added to the list of competing facilities. All competitive facility location models, regardless of their complexity or assumptions, can be modified to include lost demand and be solved by the same algorithms designed for standard models once the dummy facility is added to the data as an additional competitor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboolian R, Berman O and Krass D (2007a). Competitive facility location and design problem. Eur J Opns Res 182: 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aboolian R, Berman O and Krass D (2007b). Competitive facility location model with concave demand. Eur J Opns Res 181: 598–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell DR, Ho T-H and Tang CS (1998). Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping. J Marketing Res 35 (3): 352–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman O, Drezner T, Drezner Z and Krass D (2009). Modeling competitive facility location problems: New approaches and results. In: Oskoorouchi M (ed). TutORials in Operations Research. INFORMS: San Diego, pp 156–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman O and Krass D (1998). Flow intercepting spatial interaction model: A new approach to optimal location of competitive facilities. Location Science 6: 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T (1994). Optimal continuous location of a retail facility, facility attractiveness, and market share: An interactive model. Journal of Retailing 70: 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T (1995). Competitive facility location in the plane. In Drezner Z (ed). Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. Springer: New York, NY, pp 285–300.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T (2006). Derived attractiveness of shopping malls. IMA J Manag Math 17: 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T and Drezner Z (1997). Replacing discrete demand with continuous demand in a competitive facility location problem. Nav Res Log 44: 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T and Drezner Z (1998). Facility location in anticipation of future competition. Location Science 6: 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T and Drezner Z (2002). Validating the gravity-based competitive location model using inferred attractiveness. Ann Opns Res 111: 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T and Drezner Z (2008). Lost demand in a competitive environment. J Opnl Res Soc 59: 362–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T, Drezner Z and Kalczynski P (2011). A cover-based competitive location model. J Opnl Res Soc 62: 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z (1982). Competitive location strategies for two facilities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 12: 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez J, Pelegrin B, Plastria F and Toth B (2007). Solving a Huff-like competitive location and design model for profit maximization in the plane. Eur J Opnl Res 179: 1274–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A and Rushton G (1987). Spatial Analysis and Location-Allocation Models. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi SL (1981). On locating new facilities in a competitive environment. Presented at ISOLDE, Second International Symposium on Location Decisions, Skodsborg; Denmark.

  • Hakimi SL (1983). On locating new facilities in a competitive environment. Eur J Opnl Res 12: 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson MJ (1981). A location-allocation model maximizing consumers’ welfare. Reg Stud 15: 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1929). Stability in competition. Econ J 39: 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff DL (1964). Defining and estimating a trade area. J Marketing 28: 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff DL (1966). A programmed solution for approximating an optimum retail location. Land Econ 42: 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain AK and Mahajan V (1979). Evaluating the competitive environment in retailing using multiplicative competitive interactive models. In: Sheth JN (ed). Research in Marketing. Vol. 2 JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, pp 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi M and Cooper LG (1974). Parameter estimate for multiplicative interactive choice model: Least squares approach. J Marketing Res 11: 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly WJ (1931). The Law of Retail Gravitation. Knickerbocker Press: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra D and ReVelle C (1995). Competitive location in discrete space. In: Drezner Z (ed). Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. Springer: New York, NY, pp 367–386.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stackelberg HV (1934). Marktform und Gleichgewicht. Julius Springer: Vienne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AG (1976). Retailers’ profits and consumers’ welfare in a spatial interaction shopping mode. In: Masser I (ed). Theory and Practice in Regional Science. Pion: London, pp 42–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z Drezner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drezner, T., Drezner, Z. Modelling lost demand in competitive facility location. J Oper Res Soc 63, 201–206 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.10

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.10

Keywords

Navigation