Skip to main content
Log in

Operational research and critical systems thinking—an integrated perspective

Part 1: OR as applied systems thinking

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

What does good OR practice mean, and what can critical systems thinking (CST) do for it? This two-part essay proposes new answers to both questions. It reaches out to the wider community of OR professionals and explains from their perspective what CST is all about and why it matters for good practice. Part 1 first reviews the idea and history of systems thinking in OR, as a basis for properly situating CST within OR. It then offers a comparative, non-partisan account of the two strands of CST, critical systems heuristics and total systems intervention, and identifies their combined potential in an ability to enhance the contextual sophistication of OR. The prevalent but inaccurate notion of the history of OR as a linear evolution from ‘hard’ to ‘soft’ and ‘critical’ systems thinking is replaced by an integrated perspective of OR as applied systems thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1973). Science in the systems age: Beyond IE, OR, and MS. Operations Research 21: 661–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RL (1974). Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RL (1979a). The future of operational research is past. Journal of the Operational Research Society 30: 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RL (1979b). Resurrecting the future of operational research. Journal of the Operational Research Society 30: 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RL (1981). Creating the Corporate Future. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RL and Emery FE (1972). On Purposeful Systems. Tavistock Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RL and Sasieni MW (1968). Fundamentals of Operations Research. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1959). What has cybernetics to do with operational research? Operational Research Quarterly (now Journal of the Operational Research Society) 10: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1972). Brain of the Firm: The Managerial Cybernetics of Organization. (2nd edn, Wiley: Chichester, 1981) Penguin: Harmondsworth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis WG, Benne KD and Chin R (eds) (1962). The Planning of Change: Readings in the Applied Behavioral Sciences. Holt, Rinehard & Winston: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger PL and Luckmann T (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday: Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd H (1978). Articulate Intervention: The Interface of Science, Mathematics and Administration. Taylor & Francis: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton GA and McCallion H (1994). An overview of the Singer/Churchman/Ackoff school of thought. Systems Practice 7: 487–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryer RA (1979). The status of the systems approach. Omega 7: 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell G and Morgan G (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Heinemann: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1972). Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem solving. Journal of Systems Engineering 3: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1978). The origins and nature of ‘hard’ systems thinking. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 5: 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1983). OR and the systems movement: Mappings and conflicts. Journal of the Operational Research Society 34: 661–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s. Journal of the Operational Research Society 36: 757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (2000). Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Systems Research 17 (Special issue, Nov): S11–S58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1961). Prediction and Optimal Decision: Philosophical Issues of a Science of Values.. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1968). The Systems Approach. Dell: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science 17: B37–B53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization. Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1979a). Paradise regained: A hope for the future of systems design education. In: Bayraktar BA, Müller-Merbach H, Roberts JE and Simpson MG (eds). Education in Systems Science. Taylor & Francis: London, pp 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1979b). The Systems Approach and Its Enemies. Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW, Ackoff RL and Arnoff EL (1957). Introduction to Operations Research. Wiley: New York, and Chapman & Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW and Schainblatt AH (1965a). The researcher and the manager: A dialectic of implementation. Management Science 11: B69–B87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW and Schainblatt AH (1965b). On mutual understanding. Management Science 12: B40–B42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW and Ulrich W (1980). The status of the systems approach: Reply to Bryer. Omega 8: 277–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daellenbach HG and Read EG (1998). Success and survival of OR groups—Where to from here? Journal of the Operational Research Society 49: 430–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dando MR and Bennett PG (1981). A Kuhnian crisis in management science? Journal of the Operational Research Society 32: 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dando MR, Defrenne A and Sharp RG (1977). Could OR be a science? Omega 5: 89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetter RB and Freeman JL (1986). Diagnosis related groups: Product line management within hospitals. Academy of Management Review 11: 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetter RB, Shin Y, Freeman JL, Averill RF and Thompson JD (1980). Case-mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Medical Care 18 (2), entire Supplement 2, 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL (1995). Solving Problem Solving: A Potent Force for Effective Management. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL and Jackson MC (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1961). Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • French WL and Bell C (1973). Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. 2nd edn, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Beacon Press: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society. Beacon Press: Boston, MA, and Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall AD (1962). A Methodology for Systems Engineering. Van Nostrand: Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier FS and Lieberman GJ (1990). Introduction to Operations Research. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • INFORMS (2003). What operations research is. Operations Research: The Science of Better. Website of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, http://www.scienceofbetter.org/what/index.htm.

  • Jackson MC (1982). The nature of soft systems thinking: The work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 9: 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1985). Social systems theory and practice: The need for a critical approach. International Journal of General Systems 10: 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1987a). New directions in management science. In: Jackson MC and Keys P (eds) New Directions in Management Science. Gower: Aldershot, UK, pp 133–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1987b). Present positions and future prospects in management science. Omega 15: 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1990). Beyond a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society 41: 657–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1991). Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences. Plenum: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1997). Pluralism in systems thinking and practice. In: Mingers J and Gill A (eds). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Integrating Management Science Methodologies. Wiley: Chichester, pp 347–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1999). Towards coherent pluralism in management science. Journal of the Operational Research Society 50: 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2000). Systems Approaches to Management. Kluwer/Plenum: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2006a). Beyond problem structuring methods: Reinventing the future of OR/MS. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57: 868–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2006b). Creative holism: A critical systems approach to complex problem situations. Systems Research 23: 647–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2010). Reflections on the development and contribution of critical systems thinking and practice. Systems Research 27: 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC and Keys P (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society 35: 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC and Keys P (eds) (1987). New Directions in Management Science. Gower: Aldershot, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1781/1965). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by NK Smith. St. Martin's Press: New York, 1965 (orig. Macmillan: London, 1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys P (1987). Traditional management science and the emerging critique. In Jackson MC and Keys P (eds) New Directions in Management Science. Gower: Aldershot, UK, pp 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys P (1989). OR as technology: Some issues and implications. Journal of the Operational Research Society 40: 753–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keys P (ed) (1995). Understanding the Process of Operational Research: Collected Readings. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 2 (4): 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1997). Mixing methods: Developing systemic intervention. In: Mingers J and Gill A (eds). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Integrating Management Science Methodologies. Wiley: Chichester, pp 249–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1980). Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and soft systems methodology. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 7: 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Gill A (eds) (1997). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Integrating Management Science Methodologies. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miser HJ (1991). Comments on ‘OR as technology’. Journal of the Operational Research Society 42: 429–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G (1986). Images of Organization. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Merbach H (1988). Mutual understanding, revisited after nearly 25 years. Systems Practice 1: 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod R (1996a). On the nature of OR—Entering the fray. Journal of the Operational Research Society 47: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod R (1996b). Response to Miser: The objects and objectives of operational research (Viewpoint). Journal of the Operational Research Society 47: 1325–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod R (2006). The history and ideas of pragmatism. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57: 892–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod R (2010a). Articulate intervention revisited. Journal of the Operational Research Society 61: 1078–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod R (2010b). Justifying the methods of OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society 61: 1694–1708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly 12: 286–312, Reprinted In: Hartshorne C and Weiss P (eds). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. V: Pragmatism and Pragmaticism. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1934, pp 248–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidd M and Woolley RN (1980). A pilot study of problem structuring. Journal of the Operational Research Society 31: 1063–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polya G (1945). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quade ES and Boucher WI (eds) (1968). Systems Analysis and Policy Planning: Applications in Defense. American Elsevier: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds M (2007). Evaluation based on critical systems heuristics. In Williams B and Imam I (eds). Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology. Edge Press: Point Reyes, CA, pp 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead J (1986). Custom and practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society 32: 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead J (ed) (1989). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Wiley: Chichester (rev edn: Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, Rosenhead J and Mingers J, (eds). Wiley: Chichester, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead J and Thunhurst C (1982). A materialist analysis of operational research. Journal of the Operational Research Society 33: 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein EA (1969). Process Consultation: Its Role in Organization Development. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1977). The design of problem-solving systems. Management Science 23: 1099–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1980a). The metaphysics of design: A Simon-Churchman ‘debate’. Interfaces 10 (2): 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1980b). Epistemological Foundations of a Critical Systems Approach for Social Planners: From Critical Rationalism and Critical Theory to Critical Heuristics. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley: Interdisciplinary PhD Program of the Graduate Division, 13 November 1980. Available from University Microfilm International: Ann Arbor, MI, 1981.

  • Ulrich W (1981a). On blaming the messenger for the bad news: Reply to Bryer's ‘comments’. Omega 9: 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1981b). A critique of pure cybernetic reason: The Chilean experience with cybernetics. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 8: 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1981c). Systemrationalität und praktische Vernunft—Gedanken zum Stand des Systemansatzes. Translator's Introduction to: Churchman CW. Der Systemansatz und seine Feinde. Haupt: Bern, pp 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Haupt: Bern (reprint edn Wiley: Chichester, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1987). Critical heuristics of social systems design. European Journal of Operational Research 31: 276–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1988). Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: A program of research. Systems Practice 1: 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1993). Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: A plea for critical holism. Systems Practice 6: 583–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1996). A Primer to Critical Systems Heuristics for Action Researchers. Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull: Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2000). Reflective practice in the civil society: The contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflective Practice 1: 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2001). The quest for competence in systemic research and practice. Systems Research 18: 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2003). Beyond methodology choice: Critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54: 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2004). Obituary: C West Churchman, 1913–2004. Journal of the Operational Research Society 55: 1123–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2005). A brief introduction to critical systems heuristics (CSH). ECOSENSUS project site, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/ecosensus/publications/ (also available from the author's home page at http://wulrich.com/downloads.html).

  • Ulrich W (2006). Critical pragmatism: A new approach to professional and business ethics. In: Zsolnai L (ed). Interdisciplinary Yearbook of Business Ethics, Vol. 1. Peter Lang: Oxford, pp 53–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2007). Philosophy for professionals: Towards critical pragmatism. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58: 1109–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2012). Critical systems thinking. In: Gass SI and Fu MC (eds). Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. 3rd edn, Springer: New York (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W and Reynolds M (2010). Critical systems heuristics. In: Reynolds M and Holwell S (eds). Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide. Springer: London, pp 243–292.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers G (1965). The Art of Judgement: A Study of Policy Making. Chapman & Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1949). ‘Objectivity’ in social science and social policy. In: Shils EA and Finch HA (eds). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Free Press: New York, pp 72–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley RN and Pidd M (1981). Problem structuring—A literature review. Journal of the Operational Research Society 32: 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W Ulrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulrich, W. Operational research and critical systems thinking—an integrated perspective. J Oper Res Soc 63, 1228–1247 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.141

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.141

Keywords

Navigation