Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Team assignments and scheduling for the NCAA basketball tournament

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) organizes a men's basketball tournament every March to determine the national champion for the current season. In organizing the tournament, the emphasis is typically on selection of the most deserving teams to participate and providing a fair, equitable environment in which to play that result in a true, undisputed champion for the season. However, there are growing concerns of dwindling actual attendance at tournament games and increasing financial burden on the NCAA related to reimbursable team travel expenses. In this paper, we describe the development of an integer program designed to optimize team assignments in the sense of minimizing the distance travelled by teams to game sites and the corresponding travel costs. The goal is to increase tournament accessibility to fans as well as lessen the financial impact to the NCAA while maintaining the integrity of the tournament. We test our model against actual tournament assignments from the past 5 years. Results show consistent and significant cost savings and reductions in distance travelled without compromising the fairness and structure of the tournament. Overall, we demonstrate the usefulness of the model in both operational and strategic business decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briskorn D and Drexl A (2009). A branch-and-price algorithm for scheduling sport leagues. J Opl Res Soc 60 (1): 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin BP (1996). Improved NCAA basketball tournament modeling via point spread and team strength information. Am Stat 50 (1): 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudill SB and Godwin NH (2002). Heterogeneous skewness in binary choice models: Predicting outcomes in the men's NCAA basketball tournament. J Appl Stat 29 (7): 991–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman BJ and Lynch AK (2001). Identifying the NCAA tournament ‘dance card’. Interfaces 31 (3): 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman BJ, DuMond JM and Lynch AK (2010). Evidence of bias in NCAA tournament selection and seeding. Manage Decis Econ 31 (7): 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Werra D, Ekim T and Raess C (2006). Construction of sports schedules with multiple venues. Discrete Appl Math 154 (1): 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESPN.com (2010). NCAA tournament bracket, http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/tournament, accessed 20 April 2010.

  • Fearnhead P and Taylor BM (2009). Calculating Strength of Schedule, and Choosing Teams for March Madness. Technical Report, Lancaster University, UK.

  • Henz M (2001). Scheduling a major college basketball conference–revisited. Opns Res 49 (1): 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikebe YT and Tamura A (2008). On the existence of sports schedules with multiple venues. Discrete Appl Math 156 (10): 1694–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan EH and Garstka SJ (2001). March madness and the office pool. Mngt Sci 47 (3): 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall G, Knust S, Ribeiro CC and Urrutia S (2010). Scheduling in sports: An annotated bibliography. Comput Opns Res 37 (1): 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvam P and Sokol JS (2006). A logistic regression/Markov chain model for NCAA basketball. Nav Res Log 53 (8): 788–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim A, Rodrigues B and Zhang X (2006). Scheduling sports competitions at multiple venues–revisited. Eur J Opl Res 175 (1): 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (2010a). Division I championships transportation and per diem policies, http://www.ncaa.org.

  • National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (2010b). NCAA division I men's basketball championship principles and procedures for establishing the bracket, http://www.ncaa.org.

  • Nemhauser GL and Trick MA (1998). Scheduling a major college basketball conference. J Opns Res Soc Am 46 (1): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen RV and Trick MA (2008). Round robin scheduling – a survey. Eur J Opl Res 188 (3): 617–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell RA and Urban TL (2006). A constraint programming approach to the multiple-venue, sport-scheduling problem. Comput Opns Res 33 (7): 1895–1906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro SL, Drayer J, Dwyer B and Morse AL (2009). Punching a ticket to the big dance: A critical analysis of at-large selection into the NCAA division I men's basketball tournament. J Iss Intercollegiate Athletics 2: 46–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith G (2010). Low attendance left dead atmosphere for New Orleans NCAA hoops subregional, http://www.examiner.com.

  • Smith JC (2009). Organization of a college baseball tournament. IMA J Mngt Math 20 (2): 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JC, Fraticelli BMP and Rainwater C (2006). A bracket assignment problem for the national collegiate athletic association men's basketball tournament. Int Trans Opl Res 13 (3): 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith T and Schwertman NC (1999). Can the NCAA basketball tournament seeding be used to predict margin of victory? Am Stat 53 (2): 94–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban TL and Russell RA (2003). Scheduling sports competitions on multiple venues. Eur J Opl Res 148 (2): 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright MB (2006). Scheduling fixtures for Basketball New Zealand. Comput Opns Res 33 (7): 1875–1893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Alabama, Alabama, USA

    S H Melouk & B B Keskin

Authors
  1. S H Melouk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B B Keskin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S H Melouk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melouk, S., Keskin, B. Team assignments and scheduling for the NCAA basketball tournament. J Oper Res Soc 63, 620–630 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.55

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.55

Keywords

Search

Navigation