Abstract
Conventional approaches to change management tend to be prescriptive with the assumption that the specific course of action will lead to the intended outcome, with surprise when this does not materialise as expected. This possibly can be attributed to a failure to understand the context of change and thereby the failure to deal with conditions less than conducive to supporting the desired change. This paper presents Raul Espejo's Viplan Methodology as an appropriate framework to examine the context of change in an explicit and structured manner and thereby support the creation of conditions more conducive to change, thus increasing the likelihood of the desired outcomes. It draws upon the author's experience as a practitioner engaged in effecting operational change within UK small and medium-sized enterprises.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a more detailed account refer to Ashby (1963) or Beer (1979).
The SSM is presented as a ‘cyclical learning system’, which is depicted as four activities in Checkland and Scholes (1990, Figure 1.3, p. 7).
The format of ‘activity’ is used to denote the idealised activity presented in the model of the Cybernetic Methodology in contrast to the actual practices.
The word organisation is used to denote any configuration of stakeholders, which may or may not be coterminous with formally recognised organisational entities (eg divisions, functions).
Structure is defined as the set of regular relations between stakeholders.
Formal relations and informal relations as well as cultural-political.
This is typified by the models of processes, whether actual or possible. While these might take the form of flow diagrams, they lose the richness of the detail. One approach to capture detail is to follow the documentation/screens and map the processes by creating collages using the documentation/screen-dumps. These serve as models (boundary objects) that allow discussion among the various stakeholders, with a view to reaching some form of agreement as to the desired change.
Not to be confused with the VIPLAN Methodology.
References
Ackoff RL (1974). Redesigning the Future. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
Ackoff RL (1981). The art and science of mess management. Interfaces 11 (1): 20–26.
Ashby WR (1963). An Introduction to Cybernetics. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
Baker P (2002). Why is lean so far off? Works Mngt 55 (October): 1–4.
Beer S (1966). Decision and Control. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Beer S (1972). Brain of the Firm. Allen Lane, The Penguin Press: Harmondsworth.
Beer S (ed.) (1975). Fanfare for effective freedom: Cybernetic praxis in government. The 3rd Richard Goodman Memorial Lecture, delivered, Brighton Polytechnic, Brighton, 14 February 1973. Platform for Change. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Beer S (1979). The Heart of Enterprise. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Beer S (1981). Brain of the Firm. 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Beer S (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J Opl Res Soc 35 (1): 7–25.
Beer S (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organisations. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Bellman RE and Zadeh LA (1970). Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Mngt Sci 17 (4): B141–B164.
Bhasin S and Burcher P (2006). Lean viewed as a philosophy. J Manuf Technol Mngt 17 (1): 56–72.
Boyd A, Geerling T, Gregory WJ, Kagan C, Midgley G, Murray P and Walsh MP (2007). Systemic evaluation: A participative, multi-method approach. J Opl Res Soc 58: 1306–1320.
Burns OM, Turnipseed D and Riggs WE (1991). Critical success factors in manufacturing resource planning implementation. Int J Opns Prod Mngt 11 (4): 5–19.
Callarman T and Heyl J (1986). A model for material requirements planning implementation. Int J Opns Prod Mngt 6 (5): 30–37.
Carnall CA (1990). Managing Change in Organisations. Prentice-Hall International: New York.
Checkland P (1972). Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem solving. J Syst Eng 3 (2): 87–116.
Checkland P (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Checkland P (1999). Soft Systems Methodology: A 30-Year Retrospective. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester.
Checkland P and Holwell S (2004). ‘Classic’ OR and ‘soft’ OR—An asymmetric complementarity. In: Pidd M (ed). Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Checkland P and Scholes J (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Churchman CW (1967). Guest editorial, wicked problems. Mngt Sci 14 (4): B141–B142.
Collins D (1998). Organisational Change: Sociological Perspectives. Routledge: London.
Davenport TH and Short JE (1990). The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Mngt Rev 32 (2): 11–29.
Develin & Partners (1989). The Effectiveness of Quality Improvement Programmes in British Business. Develin & Partners: London.
Dwyer J (1995). Old headline, young shoulders. Manuf Computer Solutions (July–August): 3.
Eden C and Ackermann F (2006). Where next for problem structuring methods. J Opl Res Soc 57 (7): 766–768.
Eden C, Jones S and Sims D (1983). Messing About in Problems: Informal Structured Approach to Identification and Management. Pergamon Press: Oxford.
Espejo R (1986). Lecture Notes from MBA module on ‘Problem Solving’. October–December, Aston University, Birmingham.
Espejo R (1988). A cybernetic methodology to study and design human activities. PhD Thesis, Aston University, Birmingham.
Espejo R (1990). Complexity and change: Reflections upon the cybernetic intervention in Chile, 1970–1973. Syst Pract 3 (3): 303–313.
Espejo R (1991). The cybernetic methodology. (draft), September.
Espejo R (1992). Management of complexity in problem solving. Trans Inst Measure Control 14 (1): 8–16.
Espejo R (1994). What is systemic thinking? Syst Dynam Rev 10 (2–3): 199–212.
Espejo R and Harnden RJ (eds). (1989). The Viable System Model: Interpretation and Applications of Stafford Beer's VSM. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Espejo R and Reyes A (2011). Organizational Systems: Managing Complexity with the Viable System Model. Springer: Heidelberg.
Espejo R, Schuhmann W, Schwaninger M and Bilello U (1996). Organizational Transformation and Learning. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Espejo R, Bowling D and Hoverstadt P (1999). The viable system model and the Viplan software. Kybernetes 28 (6/7): 661–678.
Espinosa A (2006). A cybernetic re-evaluation of socio-economic development programs. Kybernetes 35 (1/2): 30–44.
Espinosa A, Harnden R and Walker J (2004). Cybernetics and participation: From theory to practice. Syst Pract Action Res 17 (6): 573–589.
Espinosa A, Harnden R and Walker J (2008). A complexity approach to sustainability: Stafford Beer revisited. Eur J Opl Res 187: 636–651.
Fletcher C and Bois R (2007). Ending CRM failures: Get in the loop. 28 September, AMR Research, www.amrresearch.com/content/view.aspx?compURI=tcm:7-33871&title=Ending+CRM+Failures:+Get+in+the+Loop, accessed 12 December 2009.
Flood RL and Jackson MC (1991). Total systems intervention: A practical face to critical systems thinking. Syst Pract 4 (3): 197–213.
Francoise O, Bourgault M and Pellerin R (2009). ERP implementation by critical success factors' management. Bus Process Mngt J 15 (3): 371–394.
Hammer M (1990). Re-engineering work: Don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Bus Rev 68 (4): 104–112.
Harrington HJ (1998). Performance improvement: The rise and fall of reengineering. TQM Mag 10 (2): 69–71.
Harwood SA (2002). ERP: The Implementation Cycle. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford.
Harwood SA (2009). The changing structural dynamics of the Scottish tourism industry examined using Stafford Beer's VSM. Syst Pract Action Res 22 (4): 313–343.
Harwood SA (2011). Mixing methodologies and paradigmatic commensurability. J Opl Res Soc 62: 806–809.
Holland CP and Light B (1999). A critical success factors model for ERP implementation. IEEE Software 16 (3): 30–36.
Jackson MC (2006). Beyond problem structuring methods: Reinventing the future of OR/MS. J Opl Res Soc 57: 868–878.
King SF and Burgess TF (2006). Beyond critical success factors: A dynamic model of enterprise system innovation. Int J Inform Mngt 26 (1): 59–69.
Kneppelt LR (1981). Implementing manufacturing resource planning/difficulty of the task. Prod Invent Mngt 22 (2): 39–47.
Lippitt GL, Langseth. P and Mossop J (1985). Implementing Organisational Change: A Practical Guide to Managing Change Efforts. Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco.
Maturana H (1970). Neurophysiology of cognition. In: Garvin PL (ed). Cognition: A Multiple View. Spartan Books: New York.
Maturana HR and Varela FJ (1988). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Shambhala: Boston.
McCalman J and Paton RA (1992). Change Management: A Guide to Effective Implementation. Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd: London.
Midgley G, Munlo I and Brown M (1998). The theory and practice of boundary critique: Developing housing services for older people. J Opl Res Soc 49 (5): 467–478.
Miller JG (1981). Fit production systems to the task. Harvard Bus Rev 59 (1): 145–154.
Mingers J (1997). Multi-paradigm multimethodology. In: Mingers JC and Gill A (eds). Multimethodology. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester.
Mingers J and Brocklesby J (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega 25 (5): 489–509.
Mingers J and Rosenhead J (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. Eur J Opl Res 152: 530–554.
Morecroft JDW (1983). A systems perspective on material requirements planning. Decis Sci 14 (1): 1–18.
O'Corrbui D and Corboy M (1999). The seven deadly sins of strategy. Mngt Account 10: 1–5.
Parr A and Shanks G (2000). A model of ERP project implementation. J Inform Technol 15 (4): 289–303.
Paucar-Caceres A (2010). The development of management sciences/operational research discourses: Surveying the trends in the US and the UK. J Opl Res Soc 58: 1–19.
Paucar-Caceres A and Rodriguez-Ulloa R (2007). An application of Soft Systems Dynamics Methodology (SSDM). J Opl Res Soc 58: 701–713.
Rittel HWJ and Webber MM (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Pol Sci 4: 155–169.
Rockart JF (1979). Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Bus Rev 57 (2): 81–93.
Rodriguez-Ulloa R and Paucar-Caceres A (2005). Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM): Combining soft systems methodology (SSM) and systems dynamics (SD). Syst Pract Action Res 18 (3): 303–334.
Rosenhead J (1996). What's the problem? An introduction to problem structuring methods. Interfaces 26: 117–131.
Star SL (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Gasser L and Huhns MH (eds). Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 2, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco, CA.
Stickland F (1998). The Dynamics of Change: Insights into the Organisational Transition from the Natural World. Routledge: London.
Taylor FW (1947). The Principles of Scientific Management. W.W. Norton & Company: New York.
Timco D (2001). Lean manufacturing: ‘Been there, done that’, http://www.sae.org/manufacturing/lean/column/leanmay01.htm, accessed 5 January 2010.
Ulrich W (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Haupt: Bern.
Ulrich W (2003). Beyond methodology choice: Critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse. J Opl Res Soc 54 (4): 325–342.
von Foerster H (1979). Cybernetics of cybernetics. In: Krippendorff K (ed). Communications and Control in Society. Gordon & Breach: New York.
Williams JJ and Ramaprasad A (1996). A taxonomy of critical success factors. Eur J Inform Syst 5: 250–260.
Wilson B (1984). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester.
Woolley RN and Pidd M (1981). Problem structuring—A literature review. J Opl Res Soc 32 (3): 197–206.
Zadeh LA (1965). Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8 (June): 99–102.
Acknowledgements
Very special thanks must go to Professor Raul Espejo for sharing his thoughts about the Viplan Methodology and for his critical comments about earlier drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank Gary Scott, an operations manager, who provided a practitioner insight on this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harwood, S. The management of change and the Viplan Methodology in practice. J Oper Res Soc 63, 748–761 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.73
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.73