Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation as a tool for gaming and training in operations management—a case study

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Simulation

Abstract

Traditionally, discrete event simulation is associated with system analysis due to its role as an operations research method. In this article, we consider a case study on the alternative use of simulation for training industrial workers in new working procedures. Essentially, training games are based on players learning from model responses to their decision-making. When stressing the role of the decision maker instead of operations—as in operations research—alternative demands on model set up and use arise. Identifying such demands and ways to deal with them helps to exploit existing simulation knowledge and tools for company training and engineering education. The case study deals with a manual assembly line for mail-inserting systems for which a simulation game for worker training was developed. Insights obtained are concerned with the inclusion of player decision-making in conceptual modelling, its implementation using a commercially available simulation tool, and the set up of valid game plots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelsberger HH, Bick MH, Kraus UF and Pawlowski JM (1999). A simulation game approach for efficient education in enterprise resource planning systems. In: Szczerbicka H (ed). Proceedings of the 13th European Simulation Multiconference, Warsaw. Society for Computer Simulation: Ghent Belgium, pp 454–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelides MC and Paul RJ (1993). Towards a framework for integrating intelligent tutoring systems and gaming simulation. In: Evans GW, Mollaghasemi M, Russell EC and Biles WE (eds). Proceedings of the 1993 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, pp 1281–1289.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Au G and Paul RJ (1996). Visual interactive modelling: A pictorial simulation specification system. Eur J Opl Res 91 (1): 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines T, Mason S, Siebers P and Ladbrook J (2004). Humans: The missing link in manufacturing simulation? Simul Model Pract Theory 12: 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudin M (2002). Lean Assembly—The Nuts and Bolts of Making Assembly Operations Flow. Productivity Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell PC (1985). Visual interactive modeling in operational research—Successes and opportunities. J Opl Res Soc 36 (11): 975–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell PC (1990). Visual interactive modeling—The past, the present, and the prospects. Eur J Opl Res 54 (3): 274–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodner DA and McGinnis LF (2002). A structured approach to simulation modelling of manufacturing systems. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Industrial Engineering Research Conference. Norcross, GA, IIE: Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman GM and Martin JF (1995). Computerized business games in engineering education. Comput Educ 25 (1/2): 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chwif L and Barretto MRP (2003). Simulation models as an aid for the teaching and learning process in operations management. In: Chick S, Sánchez PJ, Ferrin D and Morrice DJ (eds). Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, pp 1994–2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Corsun DL (2000). We sail the same ship: Response to “shuffling deck chairs”. J Hosp Tour Educ 12 (3): 10–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crookall D (1995). A guide to literature on simulation/gaming. In: Crookall D and Arai K (eds). Simulation and Gaming across Disciplines and Cultures. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, pp 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebben MJR, Zee DJ and van der Heijden MC (2004). Dynamic one-way traffic control in automated transportation systems. Transport Res B 38 (5): 441–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria AJ and Wellington WJ (2004). A survey of simulation game users, former users, and never users. Simul Gam 35: 178–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galland S, Grimaud F, Beaune P and Campagne JP (2003). M(A)MA-L: An introduction to a methodological approach for the simulation of distributed industrial systems. Int J Prod Econ 85 (1): 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman S, Nagel R and Preiss K (1995). Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations—Strategies for Enriching the Customer. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblat CS (1988). Designing Games and Simulations—An Illustrated Handbook. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblat CS and Duke RD (1981). Principles and Practices of Gaming Simulation. Sage Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapsalo H and Hyvonen J (2001). Simulating business and operations management—A learning environment for the electronics industry. Int J Prod Econ 73: 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrion RD (1976). The design, use and required facilities of an interactive computer simulation language to explore production planning problems. PhD thesis, University of London, England.

  • Jones K (1995). Simulations: A Handbook for Teachers and Trainers, 3rd edn. Nichols Publishing Company: East Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones K (1998). Simulations: Reading for action. Simul Gam 29: 326–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalk L (2005). Logistieke beheersing van een vraaggestuurde assemblagelijn. Master thesis. University of Groningen, The Netherlands (in Dutch).

  • Klabbers JHG (2003). The gaming landscape: A taxonomy for classifying games and simulations. In: Copier M and Raessens J (eds). Digital Games Research Conference 2003. University of Utrecht: Utrecht, pp 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A and Labib AW (2004). Applying quality function deployment for the design of a next-generation manufacturing simulation game. Int J Eng Educ 20 (5): 787–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lainema T and Hilmola OP (2005). Learn more, better and faster: Computer-based simulation gaming of production and operations. Int J Bus Perform Mngt 7 (1): 34–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law AM and Kelton WD (2000). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. McGraw-Hill: Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHaney R, White D and Heilman GE (2002). Simulation project success and failure: Survey findings. Simul Gam 33: 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt DB, Farrington PA, Basnet CB, Bhuskute HC, Kanath M and Mize JH (1994). The separation of physical, information, and control elements for facilitating reusability in simulation modelling. Int J Comput Simul 4 (3): 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raser JR (1969). Simulation and Society: An Exploration of Scientific Gaming. Allyn and Bacon: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riis JO, Johansen J and Mikkelsen H (1995). Simulation games in production management—An introduction. In: Riis JO (ed). Simulation Games and Learning in Production Management. Chapman & Hall: London, pp 3–11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S (2001). Soft with a hard centre: Discrete-event simulation in facilitation. J Opl Res Soc 52 (8): 905–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S (2005). Discrete-event simulation: From the pioneers to the present, what next? J Opl Res Soc 56 (6): 619–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S (2007). Conceptual modelling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements. J Opl Res Soc 59: 278–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S, Alifantis T, Edwards JS, Ladbrook J and Waller A (2005). Knowledge based improvement: Simulation and artificial intelligence for identifying and improving human decision-making in an operations system. J Opl Res Soc 56 (8): 912–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruohomaki V (1995). Learning and education with simulation games. In: Riis JO (ed). Simulation Games and Learning in Production Management. Chapman & Hall: London, pp 13–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruohomaki V (2003). Simulation gaming for organizational development. Simul Gam 34: 531–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slomp J, van der Zee DJ and Molleman E (2007). Exploring success factors of a computer game—The development and use of a ‘Takt Time Control’ game. In: Peters V, Van de Westelaken M, Van Gils A and Van Loveren A (eds). Proceedings of the 2007 Conference of The International Simulation and Gaming Association (ISAGA). ISAGA: Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeds R (2003). Simulation for accelerated learning and development in industrial management—Guest editorial. Prod Plann Control 14 (2): 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SJE, Wang X, Turner SJ and Low MYH (2006). Integrating heterogeneous distributed COTS discrete-event simulation packages: An emerging standards-based approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet—Part A: Syst Hum 36 (1): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vorst JGAJ, Tromp S and Van der Zee DJ (2005). A simulation environment for the redesign of food supply chain networks: Integrating quality and logistics modeling. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB and Joines JA (eds). Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, pp 1658–1667.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zee DJ (1997). Simulation as a tool for logistics management. Phd thesis. University of Twente, The Netherlands.

  • Van der Zee DJ (2006a). Modeling decision making and control in manufacturing simulation. Int J Prod Econ 100 (1): 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zee DJ (2006b). Building communicative models—A job oriented approach to manufacturing simulation. In: J Garnett, Brailsford S, Robinson S and Taylor S (eds). Proceedings of the Operational Research Society Simulation Workshop (SW06). Operational Research Society: Birmingham, pp 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zee DJ (2007). Developing participative simulation models—Framing decomposition principles for joint understanding. J Simul 1 (3): 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zee DJ, Pool A and Wijngaard J (2008). Conceptual modelling of planning & control systems for simulation—A case study in industry. In: Kotiadis K, Currie C, Robinson S and Taylor S (eds). Proceedings of the Operational Research Society Simulation Workshop (SW08). Birmingham: Operational Research Society (accepted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zee DJ and Slomp J (2005). Simulation and gaming as a support tool for lean manufacturing systems—A case example from industry. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB and Joines JA (eds). Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, pp 2304–2313.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zee DJ and Van der Vorst JGAJ (2005). A modeling framework for supply chain simulation—Opportunities for improved decision-making. Decis Sci 36 (1): 65–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten SPA and Jacobs PHM (2004). An architecture for distributed simulation games. In: Ingalls RG, Rossetti MD, Smith JS and Peters BA (eds). Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, pp 2081–2086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten SPA, Verbraeck A, Boyson S and Corsi T (2005). Training for today's supply chains: An introduction to the distributor game. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB and Joines JA (eds). Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, pp 2338–2345.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verbraeck A and Van Houten SPA (2005). From simulation to gaming: An object-oriented supply chain training library. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB and Joines JA (eds). Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, pp 2346–2356.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wind H (2006). Ontwerp van een assemblagelijn. Master thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands (in Dutch).

  • Womack K, Jones D and Roos D (1990). The Machine that Changed the World. Maxwell Macmillan International: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulch G and Brinkmeier B (1995). Simulation aided planning of work structures. In: Riis JO (ed). Simulation Games and Learning in Production Management. Chapman & Hall: London, pp 91–104.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zyda M (2004). Does the future of modeling and simulation have a game face? In: RG Ingalls, MD Rossetti, JS Smith and BA Peters (eds). Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, p 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyda M (2005). From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer 38 (9): 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Zee, DJ., Slomp, J. Simulation as a tool for gaming and training in operations management—a case study. J Simulation 3, 17–28 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2008.8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2008.8

Keywords

Navigation