Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

System dynamics modelling to support policy analysis for sustainable health care

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Simulation

Abstract

System dynamics (SD) is an established simulation methodology used to explore the behaviour of social systems over time. The field has addressed challenging sustainability problems in fisheries, urban planning and environmental resource management. It has also been successfully applied to health care, in chronic disease modelling and workforce planning. This paper presents SD models of health-care sustainability, and illustrates two complementary applications of SD: (i) continuous simulation of health-care infrastructure adequacy; and (ii) conceptual modelling of the wider public policy context for health-care sustainability. The infrastructure model provides a simulator for evaluating impacts of population growth and ageing, as well as assessing the likely effects of policy interventions on system sustainability. This model is validated using empirical data from Ireland’s public health service, and its practical application for sustainability analysis is illustrated. Our conceptual endogenous SD model explores a wider system boundary and public policy interdependencies that impact sustainability outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyd CM, Ritchie CS, Tipton EF, Studenski SA and Wieland D (2008). From bedside to bench: Summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Comorbidity and Multiple Morbidity in Older Adults. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 20(3): 181–188.

  • Brailsford SC, Desai SM and Viana J (2010). Towards the holy grail: Combining system dynamics and discrete-event simulation in healthcare. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference. Baltimore, MD: Winter Simulation Conference.

  • Brailsford SC, Harper PR, Patel B and Pitt M (2009). An analysis of the academic literature on simulation and modelling in health care. Journal of Simulation 3 (3): 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CompAuthority (2010). Competition in professional services: General medical practitioners. The Competition Authority. Parnell Square, Dublin 1.

  • CSO (2013). Population and labour force projections, 2016-2046. Central statistics office, Dublin, Ireland, ISBN : 978-1-4064-2732-5.

  • DoHC (2010). Report of the Expert Group on Resource Allocation and Financing in the Health Sector. Department of Health and Children, Dublin.

  • DoHC (2012). Health in Ireland: Key Trends 2012. Department of Health and Children, Dublin.

  • Duggan J (2008). Equation-based policy optimization for agent-oriented system dynamics models. System Dynamics Review 24 (1): 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein RL and Thompson JP (2013). Precise modeling of aging populations. System Dynamics Review 29 (2): 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikemo TA, Bambra C, Judge K and Ringdal K (2008). Welfare state regimes and differences in self-perceived health in Europe: A multilevel analysis. Social Science and Medicine 66 (11): 2281–2295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2012). Activity in Acute Public Hospitals in Ireland.

  • Fallah-Fini S, Rahmandad H, Chen H-J, Xue H and Wang Y (2013). Connecting micro dynamics and population distributions in system dynamics models. System Dynamics Review 29 (4): 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann CG and Tieso JV (1998). The Practical Guide to Business Process Reengineering Using IDEF0. Dorset House Pub: UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Pegasus Communications: Waltham, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffarzadegan N, Lyneis J and Richardson GP (2011). How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process. System Dynamics Review 27 (1): 22–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch G, Homer J, McDonnell G and Millstein B (2005). Achieving health care reform in the United States: Towards a whole-system understanding. In: Systems Dynamics Conference, System Dynamics Society; Boston, USA.

  • Homer J, Hirsch G and Milstein B (2007). Chronic illness in a complex health economy: The perils and promises of downstream and upstream reforms. System Dynamics Review 23 (2–3): 313–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones A, Homer J, DL M, JDK E, Milstein B and DA S (2006). Understanding diabetes population dynamics through simulation modeling and experimentation. American Journal of Public Health 96 (3): 488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsaliaki K and Mustafee N (2011). Applications of simulation within the healthcare context. Journal of the Operational Research Society 62 (8): 1431–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopainsky B, Pirnay-Dummer P and Alessi SM (2012). Automated assessment of learners’ understanding in complex dynamic systems. System Dynamics Review 28 (2): 131–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC, Monefeldt C and Rosenhead JV (2000). Looking in the wrong place for healthcare improvements: A system dynamics study of an accident and emergency department. Journal of the Operational Research Society 51 (5): 518–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layte R et al (2009). Projecting the impact of demographic change on the demand for and delivery of health care in Ireland. Dublin.

  • Macal CM and North MJ (2010). Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation 4 (3): 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mielczarek B and Uziako-Mydlikowska J (2012). Application of computer simulation modeling in the health care sector: A survey. Simulation 88 (2): 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafee N, Katsaliaki K and Taylor SJE (2010). Profiling literature in healthcare simulation. Simulation 86 (8–9): 543–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dowd T, O’Kelly M and OK F (2006). Structure of General Practice in Ireland. ICGP: Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013). OECD Health Data. OECD: Paris.

  • Olsen IT (1998). Sustainability of health care: A framework for analysis. Health Policy and Planning 13 (3): 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PA (2007). Acute Hospital Bed Capacity Review: A Preferred Health System in Ireland to 2020. Health Services Executive: Dublin.

  • Rahmandad H, Repenning N and Sterman J (2009). Effects of feedback delay on learning. System Dynamics Review 25 (4): 309–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RCGP (2006). Profile of UK General Practitioners. RCGP: London.

  • Richardson GP (2011). Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 27 (3): 219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JL (1998). A Glossary of Technical Terms on the Economics and Finance of Health Services. WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S (2005). Discrete-event simulation: From the pioneers to the present, what next? Journal of the Operational Research Society 56 (6): 619–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royston G, Dost A, Townshend J and Turner H (1999). Using system dynamics to help develop and implement policies and programmes in health care in England. System Dynamics Review 15 (3): 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (1989). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science 35 (3): 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review 10 (2–3): 291–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor K and Dangerfield B (2004). Modelling the feedback effects of reconfiguring health services. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56 (6): 659–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderby S and Carter MW (2009). An evaluation of the applicability of system dynamics to patient flow modelling. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2010 (61): 1572–1581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme E (1999). A patient flow perspective of U.K. health services: Exploring the case for new ‘intermediate care’ initiatives. System Dynamics Review 15 (3): 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme EF (2003). Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 19 (1): 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme EF and Coyle RG (1983). The development of system dynamics as a methodology for system description and qualitative analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 34 (7): 569–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong HJ, Morra D, Wu RC, Caesar M and Abrams H (2012). Using system dynamics principles for conceptual modelling of publicly funded hospitals. Journal of the Operational Research Society 63 (1): 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasarcan H (2011). Stock management in the presence of significant measurement delays. System Dynamics Review 27 (1): 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Engineering and Informatics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland

    G J Lyons & J Duggan

Authors
  1. G J Lyons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J Duggan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The model and data can be obtained from the authors upon request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lyons, G., Duggan, J. System dynamics modelling to support policy analysis for sustainable health care. J Simulation 9, 129–139 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2014.15

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2014.15

Keywords

Search

Navigation