Skip to main content
Log in

On the modelling of transportation evacuation: an agent-based discrete-event hybrid-space approach

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Simulation

Abstract

This paper develops an agent-based discrete-event simulation (AB-DES) modelling framework for transportation evacuation by integrating an event scheduling scheme into an agent-based method. This framework has a unique hybrid simulation space that includes a continuous space and a flexible-structured network. This hybrid space overcomes the cellular space limitation in cell-based evacuation models and provides flexibilities in simulating different evacuation scenarios. Based on this AB-DES framework, we create an evacuation AB-DES model using the Parallel DEVS (Discrete-EVent System specification) formalism. We develop an algorithm to employ the event-scheduling approach to eliminate time-step scheduling used in classic agent-based models. Experimental results show that the AB-DES model is significantly more efficient than a pure ABS model while keeping high model fidelity and the same model capabilities including agent cognitive capability, collision avoidance, and low agent-to-agent communication cost. The agents’ cognitive capability and autonomy property as well as the hybrid simulation space differentiate this AB-DES model from classic pure discrete-event models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed K (1999). Modeling drivers’ acceleration and land changing behavior. PhD thesis, ITS Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

  • Bar-Gera H (2001). Transportation network test problems. Available at http://www.bgu.ac.il/~bargera/tntp/, accessed 18 June 2011.

  • Becker M et al (2006). Agent-based and discrete event simulation of autonomous logistic processes. In: Borutzky W, Orsoni A and Zobel R (eds) Proceedings of 20th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, Bonn, Sankt Augustin, Germany, pp 566–571.

  • Bham G (2011). A simple lane change model for microscopic traffic flow simulation in weaving sections. Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research 3 (4): 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burghout W (2013). A note on the number of replication runs in stochastic traffic simulation models. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?rep=rep1&type=pdf&doi=10.1.1.216.7465, accessed 1 November 2013.

  • Chan WKV (2010). Foundations of simulation modeling. In: Cochran JJ (ed). Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Wiley: New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan WKV, Son Y-J and Macal CM (2010). Agent-based simulation tutorial—simulation of emergent behavior and differences between agent-based simulation and discrete-event simulation. In: Johansson B, Jain S, Montoya-Torres J and Yücesan E (eds) Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp 135–150.

  • Chiu Y-C, Zheng H, Villalobos JA, Peacock W and Henk R (2008). Evaluating regional contra-flow and phased evacuation strategies for Texas using a large-scale dynamic traffic simulation and assignment approach. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 5 (1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City-Data (2012). Miami, Florida. Available at http://www.city-data.com/city/Miami-Florida.html, accessed 18 February 2012.

  • Diaz-Emparanza I (1996). Selecting the number of replications in a simulation study. Working Paper 1996-1. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1582 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1582, accessed 1 November 2013.

  • Dubiel B and Tsimhoni O (2005). Integrating agent based modeling into a discrete event simulation. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB and Joines JA (eds) Proceedings of 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA, pp 1029–1037.

  • Gambardella LM, Rizzoli AE and Funk P (2002). Agent-based planning and simulation of combined rail/road transport. Simulation Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International 78 (5): 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazis DC, Herman R and Potts RB (1959). Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow. Operations Research 7 (4): 499–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gipps PG (1986). A model for the structure of lane-changing decisions. Transportation Research Part B 20 (5): 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackney J and Marchal F (2009). A model for coupling multi-agent social interactions and traffic simulation. Proceedings of 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.

  • Hamacher HW and Tjandra SA (2002). Mathematical Modelling of Evacuation Problems: A State of the Art. Springer-Verlag Berlin: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan S, Mesa-Arango R and Ukkusuri SV (2013). A Random-parameter hazard-based model to understand household evacuation timing behavior. Transportation Research Part C 27: 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan S, Ukkusuri SV, Gladwin H and Murray-Tuite P (2011). A behavioral model to understand household level hurricane evacuation decision making. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering 137 (5): 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu XL, Muzy A and Ntaimo L (2005). A hybrid agent-cellular space modeling approach for fire spread and suppression simulation. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB and Joines JA (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA, pp 248–255.

  • Kagaya S, Uchida K, Hagiwara T and Negishi A (2005). An application of multi-agent simulation to traffic behavior for evacuation in earthquake disaster. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 6 (303): 4224–4236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammel G and Nagel K (2009). Multi agent based large-scale evacuation simulation. Proceedings of 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.

  • Lee S, Pritchett A and Goldsman D (2001). Hybrid agent-based simulation for analyzing the national airspace system. In: Peters BA, Smith JS, Medeiros DJ and Rohrer MW (eds) Proceedings of 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, VA, USA, pp 1029–1037.

  • Lindell MK, Lu J-C and Prater CS (2005). Household decision making and evacuation in response to hurricane Lili. Natural Hazards Review 6 (4): 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Q, George B and Shekhar S (2005). Capacity constrained routing algorithms for evacuation planning: A summary of results. In: Medeiros CB, Egenhofer MJ and Bertino E (eds) Proceedings of 2005 International Symposium on Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases, Angra dos Reis, Brazil, pp 291–307.

  • Moridpour S, Sarvi M and Rose G (2010). Lane changing models: A critical review. Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research 2 (3): 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller JP (2009). Towards a formal semantics of event-based multi-agent simulations. Multi-Agent-Based Simulation IX 5269 (9): 110–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundform DJ, Schaffer J, Kim M-J, Shaw D and Thongteeraparp A (2011). Number of replications required in Monte Carlo simulation studies: A synthesis of four studies. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods10 (1), article 4. Available at http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol10/iss1/4, accessed 1 November 2013.

  • Ntaimo L, Zeigler BP, Vasconcelos MJ and Khargharia B (2004). Forest fire spread and suppression in DEVS. Simulation-Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International 80 (10): 479–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelechano N, O’Brien K, Silverman B and Badler N (2005). Crowd simulation incorporating agent psychological models, roles and communication. Proceedings of 2005 International Workshop on Crowd Simulation, Lausanne, Switzerland.

  • Perez E, Ntaimo L, Bailey C and McCormack P (2010). Modeling and simulation of nuclear medicine patient service management in DEVS. Simulation-Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International 86 (8–9): 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repast (2009). Repast home page. Available at http://repast.sourceforge.net, accessed 5 March 2009.

  • Sheffi Y (1985). Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y and Hu XL (2008). Partial-modular DEVS for improving performance of cellular space wildfire spread simulation. In: Mason SJ, Hill RR, Mönch L, Rose O, Jefferson T and Fowler JW (eds) Proceedings of 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, Vols 1–5, Miami, Florida, USA, pp 1038–1046.

  • Toledo T et al (2003). Calibration and validation of microscopic traffic simulation tools: Stockholm case study. Transportation Research Record 1831 (1): 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner G (2004). AOR modelling and simulation: Towards a general architecture for agent-based discrete event simulation. In: Giorgini P, Henderson-Sellers B and Winikoff M. (eds.) Agent-Oriented Information Systems, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, LNAI 3030, pp. 174–188.

  • Wainer G (2006). ATLAS: A language to specify traffic models using Cell-DEVS. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 14 (3): 313–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warden T, Porzel R, Gehrke JD, Herzog O, Langer H and Malaka R (2010). Towards Ontology-based Multiagent Simulations: The PlaSMA Approach. In: Bargiela A, Azam Ali S, Crowley D, Kerckhoffs EJH (eds) 24th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation (ECMS 2010). European Council for Modelling and Simulation, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp 50–56.

  • Wu S, Shuman L, Bidanda B, Kelley M, Sochats K and Balaban C (2008). Agent-based discrete event simulation modeling for disaster responses. Proceedings of 2008 Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Zeigler BP, Praehofer H and Kim TG (2000). Theory of Modeling and Simulation, 2nd edn. Academic Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B (2012). Agent-based discrete-event simulation and optimization of regional transportation evacuation. PhD dissertation, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

  • Zhang B, Chan WKV and Ukkusuri S (2011). Agent-based discrete-event hybrid-space modeling approach for transportation evacuation simulation. In: Jain S, Creasey RR, Himmelspach J, White KP and Fu M (eds) Proceedings of 2011 Winter Simulation Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, pp 199–209.

  • Zhang B, Ukkusuri S and Chan WKV (2009). Agent-based modeling for household level hurricane evacuation. In: Rossetti MD, Hill RR, Johansson B, Dunkin A and Ingalls RG (eds) Proceedings of 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, Austin, Texas, pp 2778–2784.

  • Zhou YH, de By R and Augustijn EW (2006). Explorative research on methods for discrete space/time simulation integrated with the event-based approach and agent concept. In: Wu H and Zhu Q (eds) Proceedings of Geoinformatics 2006: Geospatial Information Technology, Bellingham, pp D1–D11.

  • Zou N, Yeh S-T and Chang G-L (2005). A simulation-based emergency evacuation system for ocean City, Maryland during hurricanes. Transportation Research Record 1922 (1): 138–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Chan, W. & Ukkusuri, S. On the modelling of transportation evacuation: an agent-based discrete-event hybrid-space approach. J Simulation 8, 259–270 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2014.3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2014.3

Keywords

Navigation