Article
Journal of Public Health Policy (2005) 26, 269–281. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200028
Should the Emergency Department be Society's Health Safety Net?
Marcus Ong Eng Hock, Joseph P Ornato, Courtney Cosby and Thomas Franck
Correspondence: Marcus Ong Eng Hock, Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore. E-mail: gaeoeh@sgh.com.sg
Abstract
In the US health care system, a core safety net provider has two defining characteristics: (1) either by legal mandate or explicitly adopted mission, they maintain an "open door," offering patients services regardless of their ability to pay; and (2) a substantial portion of their patients are uninsured, on Medicaid, and/or otherwise vulnerable. The hospital Emergency Department (ED), by all accounts, falls within the definition of a core safety net provider. Yet many would argue that this is a primary health care role for which the ED was not originally intended or equipped. Should the ED be society's health-care safety net? Should it be the main provider of care for the indigent? Is this placing an unbearable strain on the ED? Should it be providing primary health-care? If not, what are the alternatives?
Keywords:
safety net, emergency department, Medicaid, Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA)


