Article

Journal of Public Health Policy (2008) 29, 121–142. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200161

Newborn Blood Spot Screening in Four Countries: Stakeholder Involvement

Beth K Potter1, Denise Avard2 and Brenda J Wilson1

  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada
  2. 2Centre de recherche en droit public, Faculty of Law, University of Montreal, Canada

Correspondence: Beth K. Potter, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1H 8M5. E-mail: bpotter@uottawa.ca

Top

Abstract

While newborn blood spot screening has historically been viewed as a public health success, the potential harms and benefits are more finely balanced for new conditions being considered for program expansion. We highlight complex issues that must be addressed in policy decisions, which in turn requires a consideration of many stakeholder perspectives. Using national policy documents from the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and Canada, we describe the participation of stakeholder organizations in the newborn screening policy process, how such organizations have incorporated stakeholder views into their own policy writing, and their recommendations for inclusiveness. Stakeholder participation in newborn screening decision-making is widely acknowledged as important, and many methods have been endorsed – consultation as well as direct or indirect input into policy development. Differences across organizations and jurisdictions raise questions about the most effective approaches for facilitating inclusiveness, suggesting a need for formal evaluative research.

Keywords:

neonatal screening, policy development, stakeholder involvement

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.

Extra navigation

.

Federation resources

ADVERTISEMENT
Link to Nature News