Abstract
This paper aims to provide insight on whether bicycling for everyday travel can help US adults meet the recommended levels of physical activity and what role public infrastructure may play in encouraging this activity. The study collected data on bicycling behavior from 166 regular cyclists in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area using global positioning system (GPS) devices. Sixty percent of the cyclists rode for more than 150 minutes per week during the study and nearly all of the bicycling was for utilitarian purposes, not exercise. A disproportionate share of the bicycling occurred on streets with bicycle lanes, separate paths, or bicycle boulevards. The data support the need for well-connected neighborhood streets and a network of bicycle-specific infrastructure to encourage more bicycling among adults. This can be accomplished through comprehensive planning, regulation, and funding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
de Geus B, De Smet S, Meeusen R . Determining the intensity and energy expenditure during commuter cycling. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:8–12.
Wen LM, Rissel C . Inverse associations between cycling to work, public transport, and overweight and obesity: findings from a population based study in Australia. Prev Med. 2008;46:29–32.
Federal Highway Administration. National Bicycling and Walking Study Five Year Status Report by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration; 1999.
Federal Highway Administration. Summary of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Pedestrian and Bicyclist Activities Prepared for 2002 Transportation Research Board Meeting. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration; 2002.
Pucher J, Komanoff C, Schimek P . Bicycling renaissance in North America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling. Transp Res Part A – Policy Practice. 1999;33:625–654.
League of American Bicyclists. Bicycle Friendly Communities. Available at http://www.bikeleague.org/programs/bicyclefriendlyamerica/communities/, accessed 30 October 2008.
Pucher J, Dijkstra L . Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from the Netherlands and Germany. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1509–1516.
Pucher J, Buehler R . Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: a comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies. Transp Policy. 2006;13:265–279.
Pucher J, Dijkstra L . Making walking and cycling safer: lessons from Europe. Transp Quart. 2000;54:25–50.
National Household Travel Survey. Available at http://nhts.ornl.gov/, accessed 30 October 2008.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2006 American Community Survey. Available at http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en, accessed 30 October 2008.
Plaut PO . Non-motorized commuting in the U.S. Transp Res Part D – Transp Environ. 2005;10:347–356.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National Survey of Pedestrian and Bicyclist Attitudes and Behaviors: Highlights Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation; 2003.
Dill J, Voros K . Factors affecting bicycling demand: initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon, region. Transp Res Rec. 2007;2031:9–17.
Shafizadeh K, Niemeier D . Bicycle journey-to-work: travel behavior characteristics and spatial analysis. Transp Res Rec. 1997;1578:84–90.
Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Collier CW, Johnson D, Schmid TL, et al. Cycling and the built environment, a U.S. perspective. Transp Res Part D – Transp Environ. 2005;10:245–261.
Health Canada. 1998 National Survey on Active Transportation; Summary Report. Go for Green; 1998. Available at http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/docs/bike_flash.pdf, accessed 30 October 2008.
Garrard J, Rose G, Lo SK . Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. Prev Med. 2008;46:55–59.
Federal Highway Administration. National Bicycling and Walking Study, Case Study No. 1: Reasons Why Bicycling and Walking are Not Being Used More Extensively as Travel Modes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation; 1992.
Cervero R, Duncan M . Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1478–1483.
Dill J, Carr T . Bicycle commuting and facilities in major U.S. cities: if you build them, commuters will use them. Transp Res Rec. 2003;1828:116–123.
Antonakos CL . Environmental and travel preferences of cyclists. Transp Res Rec. 1994;1438:25–33.
Tilahun NY, Levinson DM, Krizek KJ . Trails, lanes, or traffic: valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey. Transp Res Part A – Policy Pract. 2007;41:287–301.
Stinson M, Bhat C . Commuter bicyclist route choice: analysis using a stated preference survey. Transp Res Rec. 2003;1828:107–115.
Nelson AC, Allen D . If you build them, commuters will use them. Transp Res Rec. 1997;1578:79–83.
Howard C, Burns EK . Cycling to work in Phoenix: route choice, travel behavior, and commuter characteristics. Transp Res Rec. 2001;1773:39–46.
Krizek KJ, El-Geneidy A, Thompson K . A detailed analysis of how an urban trail system affects cyclists’ travel. Transportation. 2007;34:611–624.
Aultman-Hall L, Hall FL, Baetz BB . Analysis of Bicycle Commuter Routes Using Geographic Information Systems: Implications for Bicycle Planning. Transp Res Rec. 1998;1578:102–110.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics. How Bike Paths and Lanes Make a Difference. BTS Issue Brief. Washington, DC: Bureau of Transportation Statistics; 2004.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults – United States, 2000–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52 (32):764–769.
Murakami E, Wagner DP . Can using global positioning system (GPS) improve trip reporting? Transp Res Part C – Emerging Technol. 1999;7:149–165.
Moritz WE . Survey of North American bicycle commuters: design and aggregate results. Transp Res Rec. 1998;1578:91–101.
Population Research Center. 2007 Oregon Population Report. Portland, OR: Portland State University; 2008.
Adler S, Dill J . The evolution of transportation planning in the Portland region. In: Ozawa CP, editor. The Portland Edge. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2004.
Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies. Metropolitan Briefing Book. Portland, OR: Portland State University; 2007.
Ainsworth B, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:S498–S516.
Stopher P, FitzGerald C, Zhang J . Search for a global positioning system device to measure person travel. Transp Res Part C – Emerging Technol. 2008;16:350–369.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dill, J. Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure. J Public Health Pol 30 (Suppl 1), S95–S110 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2008.56
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2008.56