Skip to main content
Log in

Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure

  • Transportation
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to provide insight on whether bicycling for everyday travel can help US adults meet the recommended levels of physical activity and what role public infrastructure may play in encouraging this activity. The study collected data on bicycling behavior from 166 regular cyclists in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area using global positioning system (GPS) devices. Sixty percent of the cyclists rode for more than 150 minutes per week during the study and nearly all of the bicycling was for utilitarian purposes, not exercise. A disproportionate share of the bicycling occurred on streets with bicycle lanes, separate paths, or bicycle boulevards. The data support the need for well-connected neighborhood streets and a network of bicycle-specific infrastructure to encourage more bicycling among adults. This can be accomplished through comprehensive planning, regulation, and funding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • de Geus B, De Smet S, Meeusen R . Determining the intensity and energy expenditure during commuter cycling. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen LM, Rissel C . Inverse associations between cycling to work, public transport, and overweight and obesity: findings from a population based study in Australia. Prev Med. 2008;46:29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Highway Administration. National Bicycling and Walking Study Five Year Status Report by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration; 1999.

  • Federal Highway Administration. Summary of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Pedestrian and Bicyclist Activities Prepared for 2002 Transportation Research Board Meeting. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration; 2002.

  • Pucher J, Komanoff C, Schimek P . Bicycling renaissance in North America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling. Transp Res Part A – Policy Practice. 1999;33:625–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • League of American Bicyclists. Bicycle Friendly Communities. Available at http://www.bikeleague.org/programs/bicyclefriendlyamerica/communities/, accessed 30 October 2008.

  • Pucher J, Dijkstra L . Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from the Netherlands and Germany. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1509–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucher J, Buehler R . Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: a comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies. Transp Policy. 2006;13:265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucher J, Dijkstra L . Making walking and cycling safer: lessons from Europe. Transp Quart. 2000;54:25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Household Travel Survey. Available at http://nhts.ornl.gov/, accessed 30 October 2008.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2006 American Community Survey. Available at http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en, accessed 30 October 2008.

  • Plaut PO . Non-motorized commuting in the U.S. Transp Res Part D – Transp Environ. 2005;10:347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National Survey of Pedestrian and Bicyclist Attitudes and Behaviors: Highlights Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation; 2003.

  • Dill J, Voros K . Factors affecting bicycling demand: initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon, region. Transp Res Rec. 2007;2031:9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafizadeh K, Niemeier D . Bicycle journey-to-work: travel behavior characteristics and spatial analysis. Transp Res Rec. 1997;1578:84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Collier CW, Johnson D, Schmid TL, et al. Cycling and the built environment, a U.S. perspective. Transp Res Part D – Transp Environ. 2005;10:245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada. 1998 National Survey on Active Transportation; Summary Report. Go for Green; 1998. Available at http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/docs/bike_flash.pdf, accessed 30 October 2008.

  • Garrard J, Rose G, Lo SK . Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. Prev Med. 2008;46:55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Highway Administration. National Bicycling and Walking Study, Case Study No. 1: Reasons Why Bicycling and Walking are Not Being Used More Extensively as Travel Modes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation; 1992.

  • Cervero R, Duncan M . Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1478–1483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill J, Carr T . Bicycle commuting and facilities in major U.S. cities: if you build them, commuters will use them. Transp Res Rec. 2003;1828:116–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakos CL . Environmental and travel preferences of cyclists. Transp Res Rec. 1994;1438:25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilahun NY, Levinson DM, Krizek KJ . Trails, lanes, or traffic: valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey. Transp Res Part A – Policy Pract. 2007;41:287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson M, Bhat C . Commuter bicyclist route choice: analysis using a stated preference survey. Transp Res Rec. 2003;1828:107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson AC, Allen D . If you build them, commuters will use them. Transp Res Rec. 1997;1578:79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard C, Burns EK . Cycling to work in Phoenix: route choice, travel behavior, and commuter characteristics. Transp Res Rec. 2001;1773:39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krizek KJ, El-Geneidy A, Thompson K . A detailed analysis of how an urban trail system affects cyclists’ travel. Transportation. 2007;34:611–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aultman-Hall L, Hall FL, Baetz BB . Analysis of Bicycle Commuter Routes Using Geographic Information Systems: Implications for Bicycle Planning. Transp Res Rec. 1998;1578:102–110.

  • Bureau of Transportation Statistics. How Bike Paths and Lanes Make a Difference. BTS Issue Brief. Washington, DC: Bureau of Transportation Statistics; 2004.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults – United States, 2000–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52 (32):764–769.

  • Murakami E, Wagner DP . Can using global positioning system (GPS) improve trip reporting? Transp Res Part C – Emerging Technol. 1999;7:149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz WE . Survey of North American bicycle commuters: design and aggregate results. Transp Res Rec. 1998;1578:91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Population Research Center. 2007 Oregon Population Report. Portland, OR: Portland State University; 2008.

  • Adler S, Dill J . The evolution of transportation planning in the Portland region. In: Ozawa CP, editor. The Portland Edge. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies. Metropolitan Briefing Book. Portland, OR: Portland State University; 2007.

  • Ainsworth B, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:S498–S516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stopher P, FitzGerald C, Zhang J . Search for a global positioning system device to measure person travel. Transp Res Part C – Emerging Technol. 2008;16:350–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Dill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dill, J. Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure. J Public Health Pol 30 (Suppl 1), S95–S110 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2008.56

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2008.56

Keywords

Navigation