Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence of underage targeting of alcohol advertising on television in the United States: Lessons from the Lockyer v. Reynolds decisions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Underage alcohol use is a global public health problem and alcohol advertising has been associated with underage drinking. The alcohol industry regulates itself and is the primary control on alcohol advertising in many countries around the world, advising trade association members to advertise only in adult-oriented media. Despite high levels of compliance with these self-regulatory guidelines, in several countries youth exposure to alcohol advertising on television has grown faster than adult exposure. In the United States, we found that exposure for underage viewers ages 18–20 grew from 2005 through 2011 faster than any adult age group. Applying a method adopted from a court in the US to identify underage targeting of advertising, we found evidence of targeting of alcohol advertising to underage viewers ages 18–20. The court's rule appeared in Lockyer v. Reynolds (The People ex rel. Bill Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, GIC764118, 2002). We demonstrated that alcohol companies were able to modify their advertising practices to maintain current levels of adult advertising exposure while reducing youth exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Lim, S.S. et al (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380 (9859): 2224–2260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, D.K. et al (2012) Youth risk behavior surveillance – United States, 2011. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 61 (4): 1–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingson, R.W., Zha, W. and Weitzman, E.R. (2009) Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among US college students ages 18–24, 1998–2005. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 16 (16): 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J.R., Wechsler, H., Kuo, M., Seibring, M., Weitzman, E.R. and Schuckit, M.A. (2002) Alcohol abuse and dependence among US college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 63 (3): 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, H., Moeykens, B., Davenport, A., Castillo, S. and Hansen, J. (1995) The adverse impact of heavy episodic drinkers on other college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 56 (6): 628–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P., de Bruijn, A., Angus, K., Gordon, R. and Hastings, G. (2009) Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol Alcohol 44 (3): 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.A. and Foxcroft, D.R. (2009) The effect of alcohol advertising, marketing and portrayal on drinking behaviour in young people: Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMC Public Health 9 (51): 1–11.

  • Jernigan, D. (2013) Why South Africa's proposed advertising ban matters. Addiction 108 (7): 1183–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2010) Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

  • Evans, J., Dash, J., Blickman, N.C.L.P., Engle, M.K. and Mulholland, J. (2003) Alcohol Marketing and Advertising: A Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. and Kelly, R. (1999) Self-Regulation in the Alcohol Industry: A Review of Industry Efforts to Avoid Promoting Alcohol to Underage Consumers. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., Marcus, P. and Engle, M.K. (2008) Self-Regulation in the Alcohol Industry: Report of the Federal Trade Commission. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth. (2010) Youth Exposure to Alcohol Advertising on Television, 2001–2009. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

  • van den Wildenberg, E. (2011) Evaluation of the Alcohol Limit on Radio and Television in 2009 and 2010. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Dutch Institute for Alcohol Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Wildenberg, E. and van den Broeck, A. (2011) Report on Youth Exposure to Alcohol Commercials on Television in Europe: Volume of Youth Exposure in the Netherlands. Utrecht, the Netherlands: European Centre for Monitoring Alcohol Marketing (EUCAM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jernigan, D.H., Ostroff, J. and Ross, C. (2005) Alcohol advertising and youth: A measured approach. Journal of Public Health Policy 26 (3): 312–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.L., Sarda, V., Schwartz, M.B. and Brownell, K.D. (2013) Redefining ‘child-directed advertising’ to reduce unhealthy television food advertising. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 44 (4): 358–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.B. et al (2010) Breakfast cereal industry pledges to self-regulate advertising to youth: Will they improve the marketing landscape? Journal of Public Health Policy 31 (1): 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The People ex rel. Bill Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, GIC764118, 2002.

  • The People ex rel. Bill Lockyer, v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, 2004.

  • Nielsen. Copyright 2001–2011 Nielsen. Ratings and other data contained herein are the copyrighted property of Nielsen. Unauthorized use of this copyrighted material is expressly prohibited. Violators may be subject to criminal and civil penalties under federal law (17 USC 101 et seq.). All rights reserved. The Nielsen Company. 2001–2011.

  • Siegel, M. et al (2013) Brand-specific consumption of alcohol among underage youth in the United States. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 37 (7): 1195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassin, L., Pitts, S.C. and Prost, J. (2002) Binge drinking trajectories from adolescence to emerging adulthood in a high-risk sample: Predictors and substance abuse outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 70 (1): 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanny, D., Liu, Y., Brewer, R.D., Eke, P.I., Cox, S.N. and Cheal, N.E. (2013) Vital signs: Binge drinking among women and high school girls – United States, 2011. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 62 (01): 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, D.A., Grant, B.F., Stinson, F.S. and Chou, P.S. (2004) Another look at heavy episodic drinking and alcohol use disorders among college and noncollege youth. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 65 (4): 477–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harford, T.C., Grant, B.F., Yi, H.Y. and Chen, C.M. (2005) Patterns of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence criteria among adolescents and adults: Results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 29 (5): 810–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, M., Isensee, B., Sargent, J.D. and Hanewinkel, R. (2011) Attitudes as mediators of the longitudinal association between alcohol advertising and youth drinking. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 165 (7): 610–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig S Ross.

Additional information

Because exposure to alcohol advertising on television has grown faster among children than adults, a court ruling provides a standard for assessing targeting of children and thus way to reduce television advertising to youth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ross, C., Ostroff, J. & Jernigan, D. Evidence of underage targeting of alcohol advertising on television in the United States: Lessons from the Lockyer v. Reynolds decisions. J Public Health Pol 35, 105–118 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2013.52

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2013.52

Keywords

Navigation