Skip to main content
Log in

Securing support for eye health policy in low- and middle-income countries: Identifying stakeholders through a multi-level analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article empirically evaluates advocacy in low- and middle-income countries as a key tool for raising policy priority and securing high-level decision maker support in eye health. We used a unique data set based on a survey conducted by World Health Organization in 2011 on eye care and prevention of blindness in 82 low- and middle-income countries. The theoretical framework derives from the idea that a plethora of stakeholders at local and global level pressure national governments, acting in economic and the political spheres. Previously, eye care has not been investigated in such a framework. We found structural differences across countries with different income levels and proposed policy recommendations to secure high-level decision makers’ support for promoting eye health. Three case studies suggest that, in order to secure more support and resources for eye health, domestic and international stakeholders must strengthen their engagement with ministries of health at political and above all economic levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • World Health Organization. (2011) Fact Sheet No. 282, October, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/, June 2012.

  • Centre for Eye Research Australia. (2004) Clear Insight: The Economic Impact and Cost of Vision Loss in Australia. An Overview of the Report Prepared by Access Economics Pty Ltd. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Eye Research Australia.

  • Access Economics. (2009) The Economic Impact of Visual Impairment in the UK Adult Population London, UK: Access Economics.

  • Metcalfe, J. (2010) The economic argument for VISION 2020. In: R. Paddy (ed.) IAPB 2010 Report: The International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness (IAPB). London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A. and Benton, B. (2005) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Onchocerciasis Control Program. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantivess, S. and Walt, G. (2008) The role of state and non-state actors in the policy process: The contribution of policy networks to the scale-up of antiretroviral therapy in Thailand. Health Policy and Planning 23 (5): 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, L. and Raphaely, N. (2008) The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries: A review of published literature 1994–2007. Health Policy Plan 23 (5): 294–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buse, K., Mays, N. and Walt, G. (2005) Making Health Policy. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M.A. and Wagenaar, H. (eds.) (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walt, G., Shiffman, J., Schneider, H., Murray, S.F., Brugha, R. and Gilson, L. (2008) ‘Doing’ health policy analysis: Methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy and Planning 23 (5): 308–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopolito, A., Morone, P. and Sisto, R. (2011) Innovation niches and socio-technical transition: A case study of bio-refinery production. Futures 43 (1): 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, N. (2000) The use of private-sector contracts for primary health care: Theory, evidence and lessons for low-income and middle-income countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78 (6): 821–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, S. and Ajulu, D. (1999) The role of the church in advocacy: Case studies from Southern and Eastern Africa. The INTRAC Occasional Papers Series.

  • World Health Organization. (2012) Investing in eye health: Securing the support of decision-makers, http://www.who.int/blindness/Politicalanalysis.pdf, June 2012.

  • Khan, A.A., Khan, N.U., Bile, K.M. and Awan, H. (2010) Creating synergies for health systems strengthening through partnerships in Pakistan – A case study of the national eye health programme. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 16 (5): s61–s68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, P.B. (1998) Collaboration between NGOs, ministries of health and WHO in drug distribution and supply. EDM Research Series No. 027.

  • Faal, H. and Gilbert, C. (2007) Convincing governments to act: VISION 2020 and the millennium development goals. Community Eye Health Journal 20 (64): 62–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (ECO2011-23634) and from Universitat Jaume I (P1.1B2012-27).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piergiuseppe Morone.

Additional information

Disclaimer

The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

Can advocacy in low- and middle-income countries operate as a tool for raising policy priority and securing high-level decision maker support in eye health?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morone, P., Camacho Cuena, E., Kocur, I. et al. Securing support for eye health policy in low- and middle-income countries: Identifying stakeholders through a multi-level analysis. J Public Health Pol 35, 185–203 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2013.40

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2013.40

Keywords

Navigation