Abstract
Abortion policies should be based on evidence. Over the past four decades in the United States, we have accumulated more data about the practice of legal abortion than any other surgical procedure. This evidence has documented the public health impact of increased access to safer abortion. In recent years, state laws to restrict abortion access have gained momentum. An accompanying article in this issue of JPHP uses extant data to examine whether two restrictive policies have had a measurable effect on abortion morbidity. The analysis found an unexpected result – states which imposed restrictions had lower levels of abortion complications than those who did not. Various explanations exist for these findings. Caution is needed to interpret observational findings, especially with polarizing issuess like abortion.Article JPHP.2012.12, available at www.palgrave-journals.com/jphp/, relates to this commentary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gold, R.B. and Nash, E. (2012) Troubling trend: More states hostile to abortion rights as middle ground shrinks. Guttmacher Policy Review 15 (1): 14–19.
Rolnick, J. and Vorhies, J. (2012) Legal restrictions and complications of abortion: Insights from data on complication rates in the United States. Journal of Public Health Policy 33 (3): 348–362.
Cates Jr, W. (1982) Legal abortion: The public health record. Science 215 (4540): 1586–1590.
Cates Jr, W., Grimes, D.A. and Schulz, K.F. (2000) Abortion surveillance at CDC: Creating public health light out of political heat. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 19 (S1): 12–17.
Cates Jr, W., Schulz, K.F., Grimes, D.A. and Tyler Jr, C.W. (1977) The effect of delay and method choice on the risk of abortion morbidity. Family Planning Perspectives 9 (6): 266–273.
Grimes, D.A., Schulz, K.F., Cates Jr, W. and Tyler Jr, C.W. (1977) Mid-trimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation: A safe and practical alternative. New England Journal of Medicine 296 (20): 1141–1145.
Grimes, D.A. (1992) Clinicians who provide abortions: The thinning ranks. Obstetrics and Gynecology 80 (4): 719–723.
Raymond, E.G. and Grimes, D.A. (2012) The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology 119 (2, Part 1): 215–219.
Cates Jr, W. (1981) The Hyde Amendment in action: How did the restriction of federal funds for abortion affect low-income women. JAMA 246 (10): 1109–1112.
Cates Jr, W., Gold, J. and Selik, R.M. (1979) Regulation of abortion services: For better or worse? New England Journal of Medicine 301 (13): 720–723.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
On the polarizing issue of abortion, the author, a dedicated researcher and women's health advocate, relates the current state of scientific knowledge. He adds valuable insight for understanding the results of Rolnick and Vorhies’ analysis of available data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cates Jr., W. Commentary: Abortion policy and science: Can controversy and evidence co-exist?. J Public Health Pol 33, 363–367 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2012.15
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2012.15