Skip to main content
Log in

Managing large amounts of knowledge objects: cognitive and organisational problems

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

The process of knowledge objectification entails several advantages in terms of capitalising the owned knowledge, facilitating its localisation, retrieval and reuse, establishing a common cognitive base and so on. However, the management of knowledge objects is far from simple, especially in the case of large organisations with an extensive and dispersed production of knowledge objects. In principle, this issue seems to have a simple solution, that is, merging the various cognitive bases in a single one. In practice this raises several questions, both on the technical-cognitive and the organisational side. The paper deals with this topic, by discussing the case of Ernst & Young that three years ago started a project aimed at developing a global knowledge platform. In particular, it intends to identify and discuss the main problems (and possible solutions) raised by the management of large amounts of knowledge objects scattered in different parts of the organisation. In addition, it aims to show how a codification, technology-based approach to knowledge management cannot be successfully pursued without taking into account the relevant social and organisational aspects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolisani E and Scarso E (2011) Knowledge codification and ICT use in business networks. In Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management (Schwartz D and Te'eni D, Eds), Vol. 1, 2nd edn, pp 506–514, IGI Global, Hershey, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JG, Subrahmanian E and Westerberg AW (2005) The ‘global’ and the ‘local’ in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management 9 (1), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Pablos PO (2004) Knowledge flow transfers in multinational corporations: knowledge properties and implications for management. Journal of Knowledge Management 8 (6), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl MJ (2001) Knowledge management strategies: toward a taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (1), 214–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasimuddin SM (2008) A holistic view of knowledge management strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management 12 (2), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson A and Kalling T (2007) Challenges to knowledge sharing across national and intra-organizational boundaries: case studies of IKEA and SCA packaging. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 5 (3), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar JA and Ganesh LS (2011) Balancing knowledge strategy: codification and personalization during product development. Journal of Knowledge Management 15 (1), 118–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H and Choi B (2003) Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (1), 179–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leedy PD and Omrod JP (2005) Practical Research – Planning and Design, 8th edn, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier M (2007) Knowledge Management Systems: Information and Communication Technologies for Knowledge Management, 3rd edn, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra Y (2003) Why knowledge management systems fail: enablers and constraints of knowledge management in human enterprises. In Handbook on Knowledge Management (Holsapple CW, Ed), Vol. 1, pp 577–599, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffet S, McAdam R and Parkinson S (2003) An empirical analysis of knowledge management applications. Journal of Knowledge Management 7 (3), 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Bresnen M, Edelman L, Scarbrough H and Swan J (2006) Sharing knowledge across projects. Limits to ICT-led project review practices. Management Learning 37 (2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen BB and Michailova S (2007) Knowledge management systems in multinational corporations: typology and transitional dynamics. Long Range Planning 40 (3), 314–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshri I, van Fenema P and Kotlarsky J (2008) Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory. Information Systems Journal 18 (6), 593–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paik Y and Choi DY (2005) The shortcomings of a standardized global knowledge management system: the case study of Accenture. Academy of Management Executive 19 (2), 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieloff CG (1999) ‘If only HP knew what HP knows’: the roots of knowledge management at Hewlett-Packard. Journal of Knowledge Management 3 (1), 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Scarso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padova, A., Scarso, E. Managing large amounts of knowledge objects: cognitive and organisational problems. Knowl Manage Res Pract 10, 287–295 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2012.7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2012.7

Keywords

Navigation